Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Someone has called HRC's lead insurmountable? Not that I've heard. Where does this crap come from? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #1
It comes from an unrelenting effort to paint Hillary as inevitable. kristopher Apr 2016 #20
Is there a quote in there where someone says Hillary's lead being insurmountable? I didn't see it. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #21
You remain in a perpetual state of confusion. kristopher Apr 2016 #24
Care to answer the question? Are you capable? Or are you simply admitting I'm correct? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #26
Poor little darlin'. kristopher Apr 2016 #34
Then you shouldn't have any trouble leftynyc Apr 2016 #38
I don't feel the need to prove myself right any more than if I said water is wet. kristopher Apr 2016 #39
Uh - no leftynyc Apr 2016 #40
Unh - yeah kristopher Apr 2016 #42
Right, because the prospect of the SDs firebrand80 Apr 2016 #2
She's lost 6 straight primaries,.... HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #3
Losing 6 straight firebrand80 Apr 2016 #6
By your 'logic' winning streaks and momentum don't exist! AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #9
I don't really think momentum exists firebrand80 Apr 2016 #14
Neither does gravity AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #19
I think the thought of SD abandoning the PD leader is more wishful thinking ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #27
I think he's doing his supporters a disservice firebrand80 Apr 2016 #32
I don't want to believe that this is a vanity run for Sanders ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #36
It is not yet certain who will have more PD by the time of the convention. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #4
the SDs will follow the pledged delegates geek tragedy Apr 2016 #5
^that nt firebrand80 Apr 2016 #7
I would say it's slightly higher than zero either way. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #10
the superdelegates won't give a crap about that polling geek tragedy Apr 2016 #11
Kasich polls better in the general, not because he's trailing... thesquanderer Apr 2016 #16
President Obama knows a lot more than we do and he is not worried. nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #17
Obama presumably knows more than we do, but he is not omniscient. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #18
How GWB of them! Fuzzy math = "sometimes you need to ...fudge the numbers, not tell the truth GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #8
The GOP convention is only "open" if it makes it to the 3rd ballot, I believe Tarc Apr 2016 #12
Not really KingFlorez Apr 2016 #13
Clinton made a race of it towards the very end SFnomad Apr 2016 #23
It is essentially over Renew Deal Apr 2016 #15
The Sanders cheerleaders are having a Karl Rove Ohio sized meltdown SFnomad Apr 2016 #22
Where is the error? kristopher Apr 2016 #25
Clinton will have the majority of pledged delegates ... SFnomad Apr 2016 #28
So you admit (by diverting from question) that there is no error. kristopher Apr 2016 #29
Apparently you had problems reading my original post in this thread. Do I need to use smaller words? SFnomad Apr 2016 #30
It is more than just a technical possibility; it is a real possibility. kristopher Apr 2016 #33
In the real world, it doesn't matter what "technically" can happen SFnomad Apr 2016 #35
I take it your predictive abilities have made you a fortune on the stock market, right? kristopher Apr 2016 #37
Bzzzt, I've never claimed to be able to predict the stock market SFnomad Apr 2016 #41
Fuzzy Math? Where would anybody get such a crazy idea? Octafish Apr 2016 #31
As the events today washed over me, I thought of that photo... kristopher Apr 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Dellamaide: "Hillary Clin...»Reply #19