Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
It's not like there's a planet wide crisis..... daleanime Apr 2016 #1
K&R amborin Apr 2016 #2
Seriously. And NYC is projected to be underwater in less than a century RiverLover Apr 2016 #5
But...but..... they didn't donate DIRECTLY to her campaign! jillan Apr 2016 #3
Thanks to Donkees for sharing this earlier. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #6
Too true.... daleanime Apr 2016 #11
and..and..didn't cor-ordinate...Citizens United decision did real damage to this country. EndElectoral Apr 2016 #7
And they didn't. nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #8
The two steppin' going on in her campaign..... daleanime Apr 2016 #9
So, "The entire premise of the OP is false, but I'm still supporting it"? Recursion Apr 2016 #14
So you just skipped over the "& her SuperPAC" part? (nt) jeff47 Apr 2016 #59
Thank you for posting. /nt think Apr 2016 #4
K&R Dragonfli Apr 2016 #10
more here: amborin Apr 2016 #12
Thanks for posting. More proof she's a player -trying- to play US. RiverLover Apr 2016 #13
Enbridge. That speaks to foreign policy as well as U.S. and what it says suffragette Apr 2016 #15
Thanks. I couldn't link from my current device to post. mmonk Apr 2016 #16
Gosh. That would explain the, um, er, lack of action. Octafish Apr 2016 #17
Its really sad. RiverLover Apr 2016 #26
What the late, great DUer JackpineRadical said... Octafish Apr 2016 #37
Octafish. What a beautiful post. RiverLover Apr 2016 #39
This is false. This is individual money, not corporate money. Corporations can't donate to campaigns DanTex Apr 2016 #18
Yes. Only their employees can. But the corporation CAN give money to her super pacs. Correct? think Apr 2016 #20
They can but they haven't so far. The SuperPACs backing Hillary and Bernie have thus far DanTex Apr 2016 #22
A serious question - do you understand that ethics isn't law? kristopher Apr 2016 #25
Sure but I don't see what the relevance is. Hillary has done nothing either unethical or illegal, DanTex Apr 2016 #28
No, of course not. $21,648,000 corporate money when she knew she was running... kristopher Apr 2016 #38
"Hillary has done nothing either unethical or illegal" Dem2 Apr 2016 #49
But they can & DO give to SuperPACs. Why do you think we're so against Citizens United? RiverLover Apr 2016 #21
They can, but so far SuperPACs supporting Bernie and Hillary have been funded by individuals. DanTex Apr 2016 #23
You are triangulating. A corporation is composed of people. Those people give on behalf of the RiverLover Apr 2016 #29
"You are triangulating" marmar Apr 2016 #30
Yep. RiverLover Apr 2016 #34
There's the Mitt Romney meme again. Interesting that the far left has jumped on that. DanTex Apr 2016 #32
Seriously, who do you think is buying this BS of yours? RiverLover Apr 2016 #33
Everyone outside the Bernie bubble understands the difference between corporate money DanTex Apr 2016 #35
... RiverLover Apr 2016 #41
It's indicative of how little the Clinton campaign and its fellow travelers think of voters..... marmar Apr 2016 #40
only the elite matter; it's part of her religion: amborin Apr 2016 #56
i trust greenpeace over dan questionseverything Apr 2016 #54
BOOM! RiverLover Apr 2016 #63
$21,648,000 in corporate money when everyone knew she was running for president. kristopher Apr 2016 #42
Kick azmom Apr 2016 #19
Jimmy Carter calls it "legalized bribery". kristopher Apr 2016 #24
Ha! Touche! RiverLover Apr 2016 #27
The entire Sanders campaign ... salinsky Apr 2016 #31
Citing facts is definitely within the character of the Sanders campaign. revbones Apr 2016 #51
What do you call it when ... salinsky Apr 2016 #52
Sanders has received nearly a million dollars from Internet-related firms. randome Apr 2016 #36
I'd be concerned if that were true. RiverLover Apr 2016 #44
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #43
Thanks Joe, for R&King. RiverLover Apr 2016 #45
:) Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #47
Thank you. I can't believe the pretzel-logic spinning that's going on here from Marr Apr 2016 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author felix_numinous Apr 2016 #48
To anyone who has ethics re: money in politics loyalsister Apr 2016 #50
Her outfits always remind me of Dr. Evil PonyUp Apr 2016 #53
Poor Hillary, her baggage car is overflowing again. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #55
since when do "progressives" support fossil fuels? nt TheDormouse Apr 2016 #57
An Inconvenient Truth. AzDar Apr 2016 #58
Just Another True "Smear" colsohlibgal Apr 2016 #60
Politifact confirms she receives $$$$ from fossil fuel industry amborin Apr 2016 #61
Yeha, Greenpeace is reliable on this... joeybee12 Apr 2016 #62
Her reaction to the allegations are proof enough of her complicity randr Apr 2016 #64
Libya. Octafish Apr 2016 #65
kicking amborin Apr 2016 #66
her behavior us anti-environment amborin Apr 2016 #67
She makes me hurl. PonyUp Apr 2016 #68
As if approved by Cheney himself. Octafish Apr 2016 #69
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»FACT: Hillary & her Super...»Reply #68