Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Rachel Maddow Take A Leave Of Absence Till The Primaries Are Over [View all]yellowcanine
(35,694 posts)152. She is a commentator/pundit, not a journalist.
And she does a better job than anyone else in exposing the Republicans for fraud.
Sorry but she doesn't need your approval to continue to do what she does.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rachel Maddow is the best investigative journalist on television today. She's going nowhere.
Trust Buster
Apr 2016
#1
She doesn't want to be fired like Keith, Ed or anyone else who tells the truth on the Corp Media.
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#158
She isn't going anywhere because the Corps bought her soul for $7 million per year.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#38
Watch out, they'll buy Birdiebro next !!! lol.. this is gob smacking, everyone is under the bus
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#110
Clinton's Cheerleader and the words investigative journalist do not belong in the same sentence.
Skwmom
Apr 2016
#133
MSNBC is a channel for rich, old, establishment Dems. Of COURSE Rachel will be kissing Hill's butt!
reformist2
Apr 2016
#31
I Am Not Going To Watch Her S**T And Neither Are Any People I Know! She IS A TOTAL SHILL!
CorporatistNation
Apr 2016
#122
She ain't goin nowhere...she has to promote Hillary, since the voters are not
angstlessk
Apr 2016
#5
"2.5 million more votes isn't as significant as a bird landing on a podium."
lunamagica
Apr 2016
#121
When she was boosting Sanders' campaign, you were probably all about Rachel Maddow.
CalvinballPro
Apr 2016
#6
She reported on his campaign. It was only when the Sanders campaign claimed that they had not
CalvinballPro
Apr 2016
#86
Nope, pulled if from reality that there are a total lack of itemized deductions from Sanders taxes
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#124
Common sense, logic, and watching her show where she expressed the same sentiments.
CalvinballPro
Apr 2016
#127
They didn't really compete in several states but it didn't fit her narrative. She was AFTER Bernie
Skwmom
Apr 2016
#134
What's the point? Anybody who replaces her will have all the same views and attitudes.
Cheese Sandwich
Apr 2016
#10
Even if that's true, there is something about her that is so juvenile and gossipy
snowy owl
Apr 2016
#81
You know those Yale students and their expectation of being provided a safe space
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#16
A "joke" in a small company I worked for decades ago -- If you're willing to take a big pay cut, you
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#120
Well, that's much better than triangulation to propel the right wing's agenda.
Arugula Latte
Apr 2016
#161
Oh FFS, Rachel is NOT like Rush and any Dem candidate is not like a Rep candidate
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#156
Hilarious. Weird that this would be posted two days after the last time she was on air.
onehandle
Apr 2016
#33
Careful what you wish for. He will see right through Sanders also. #vettingBernie
riversedge
Apr 2016
#43
Supporting Hillary Is Supporting Our Current Corrupt From Top To Bottom Government
Yallow
Apr 2016
#97
Rachel is throwing away her credibility. Sad to see folks fall on their swords for the Clintons.
w4rma
Apr 2016
#83
How else would you report on a losing candidate? He gets short shrift because he's losing...
anotherproletariat
Apr 2016
#105
Well, a bird DID land on his podium during his speech/ sarcasm <--- cause this is needed around here
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#114