Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Rachel Maddow Take A Leave Of Absence Till The Primaries Are Over [View all]NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)87. Chris Hayes isn't pro-Sanders enough for you?!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rachel Maddow is the best investigative journalist on television today. She's going nowhere.
Trust Buster
Apr 2016
#1
She doesn't want to be fired like Keith, Ed or anyone else who tells the truth on the Corp Media.
sabrina 1
Apr 2016
#158
She isn't going anywhere because the Corps bought her soul for $7 million per year.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#38
Watch out, they'll buy Birdiebro next !!! lol.. this is gob smacking, everyone is under the bus
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#110
Clinton's Cheerleader and the words investigative journalist do not belong in the same sentence.
Skwmom
Apr 2016
#133
MSNBC is a channel for rich, old, establishment Dems. Of COURSE Rachel will be kissing Hill's butt!
reformist2
Apr 2016
#31
I Am Not Going To Watch Her S**T And Neither Are Any People I Know! She IS A TOTAL SHILL!
CorporatistNation
Apr 2016
#122
She ain't goin nowhere...she has to promote Hillary, since the voters are not
angstlessk
Apr 2016
#5
"2.5 million more votes isn't as significant as a bird landing on a podium."
lunamagica
Apr 2016
#121
When she was boosting Sanders' campaign, you were probably all about Rachel Maddow.
CalvinballPro
Apr 2016
#6
She reported on his campaign. It was only when the Sanders campaign claimed that they had not
CalvinballPro
Apr 2016
#86
Nope, pulled if from reality that there are a total lack of itemized deductions from Sanders taxes
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#124
Common sense, logic, and watching her show where she expressed the same sentiments.
CalvinballPro
Apr 2016
#127
They didn't really compete in several states but it didn't fit her narrative. She was AFTER Bernie
Skwmom
Apr 2016
#134
What's the point? Anybody who replaces her will have all the same views and attitudes.
Cheese Sandwich
Apr 2016
#10
Even if that's true, there is something about her that is so juvenile and gossipy
snowy owl
Apr 2016
#81
You know those Yale students and their expectation of being provided a safe space
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#16
A "joke" in a small company I worked for decades ago -- If you're willing to take a big pay cut, you
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#120
Well, that's much better than triangulation to propel the right wing's agenda.
Arugula Latte
Apr 2016
#161
Oh FFS, Rachel is NOT like Rush and any Dem candidate is not like a Rep candidate
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#156
Hilarious. Weird that this would be posted two days after the last time she was on air.
onehandle
Apr 2016
#33
Careful what you wish for. He will see right through Sanders also. #vettingBernie
riversedge
Apr 2016
#43
Supporting Hillary Is Supporting Our Current Corrupt From Top To Bottom Government
Yallow
Apr 2016
#97
Rachel is throwing away her credibility. Sad to see folks fall on their swords for the Clintons.
w4rma
Apr 2016
#83
How else would you report on a losing candidate? He gets short shrift because he's losing...
anotherproletariat
Apr 2016
#105
Well, a bird DID land on his podium during his speech/ sarcasm <--- cause this is needed around here
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#114