HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Bill Clinton Was the Keyn... » Reply #24

Response to ViseGrip (Original post)

Sun Apr 3, 2016, 02:52 PM

24. Corruption

I could look away at all the other stuff about Hillary Clinton.

However the "speaking fees" are where I draw a line.

Secret emails = maybe repub smear campaign
Not releasing speech content = lame excuse not to release, but whatever ...
Super Pacs = most are using them, money is going to campaign support, it's BS but whatever
Her Neoliberlism = at least the Dems throw middle and working class some crumbs
Flip flopping = they all do it
Misc Mudslinging = sigh

However, with these speaking fees, influence money is going directly into their personal bank accounts, the sheer volume and millions "earned" is what I can't get past. Yes other politicians have received mega money from speeches, but almost all after LEAVING politics for good.

The vast amount of personal wealth the Clintons obtained for "speaking" is obscene. He, while she was a senator and SOS, and she during her brief hiatus before jumping back into the political arena.

I could overlook a few engagements, and certainly fees earned speaking to the more neutral audiences, like University students. But if you look at the majority of organizations that bought a Clinton Speaker, it reads like a who's who of the big industry players that always have their hands out begging for more legislation that increases their bottom dollars, (while usually screwing over the average American).

The majority of speaking fees are bribes, money going directly into Clinton's personal bank account that is meant to influence political decisions in their favor. There is no other name for it. This happens all over the world and its called corruption.

Individuals holding political decision making power and their close relatives (spouse, children still living in the family home) should not accept anything of value that benefits them directly from any person or entity that is seeking an unfair advantage through legislation or other political decisions.

A person with integrity would never put themselves in such a position because generally you either have to screw over those that paid the influence money or the people you promised to protect from being taken advantage of by big industry. Rarely is it ever possible to serve both, which is why the money is being offered in the first place.

What I'm trying to say is I could be a good Democrat and support the Clintons despite any smears, or whatever else is thrown their way.

But no matter how much I try, I simply cannot get past the vast amount of personal wealth they have achieved by accepting what can only be called influence money. It's the very definition of absolute corruption no matter how you look at it.





Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 31 replies Author Time Post
ViseGrip Apr 2016 OP
dchill Apr 2016 #1
CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #23
ViseGrip Apr 2016 #2
think Apr 2016 #3
ViseGrip Apr 2016 #4
RiverLover Apr 2016 #5
Jackilope Apr 2016 #10
Jackilope Apr 2016 #6
libtodeath Apr 2016 #7
ViseGrip Apr 2016 #8
Scuba Apr 2016 #9
think Apr 2016 #21
Cal Carpenter Apr 2016 #11
ViseGrip Apr 2016 #12
SHRED Apr 2016 #13
SHRED Apr 2016 #14
merrily Apr 2016 #15
ViseGrip Apr 2016 #16
ViseGrip Apr 2016 #17
AzDar Apr 2016 #18
ViseGrip Apr 2016 #19
Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #20
BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #22
LineNew Reply Corruption
Avalon Sparks Apr 2016 #24
think Apr 2016 #25
cantbeserious Apr 2016 #26
Octafish Apr 2016 #27
Avalon Sparks Apr 2016 #28
Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #29
Avalon Sparks Apr 2016 #30
jfern Apr 2016 #31
Please login to view edit histories.