Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
36. He doesn't seem to understand UNACCEPTABLE.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:53 PM
Mar 2016

Sanders and Clinton are not similar or comparable in any way. They represent opposite agendas and constituencies. Sanders the 99%, Clinton the 1%. And if that weren't enough (which it is)...

Hillary is under FBI investigation for a reason. That reason is, the IGs of the State Department and the Intelligence Services both sent a referral to the FBI to look into. That would ba a "FAIL" as Secretary of State.

When she set up a private server and did all of State's business on it for 4 years, nevermind her ridiculous claim that nothing in that time was classified, that creation of the server itself was gross negligence, which is a crime. I don't care if she gets charged with that or not, and I don't care if she gets convicted. As far I the voter am concerned, she COMMITTED CRIMES in her last public office, and that means she has no business running for a higher one.

UNACCEPTABLE.

I think it's ridiculous to expect one side to fall in line with the other when the race isn't over. NWCorona Mar 2016 #1
I agree - now is not the time. djean111 Mar 2016 #3
Exactly! NWCorona Mar 2016 #8
Yeah the purity pledges got old last May when Bernie first got in the way of the coronation. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #37
Why is it ridiculous to discuss voting blue in the GE? He covered both nominee scenarios. LonePirate Mar 2016 #7
That's like asking Mayweather to contemplate loosing before a fight. NWCorona Mar 2016 #9
That is patently absurd. The issue is about the NEXT fight, not this one. LonePirate Mar 2016 #13
So it's absurd to focus on the race at hand? NWCorona Mar 2016 #15
The point he was making was about the general election, not the primary election. LonePirate Mar 2016 #18
I get that but again NWCorona Mar 2016 #21
So you're admitting you can't multi-task? LonePirate Mar 2016 #22
If you think that's the issue then you'd be wrong NWCorona Mar 2016 #23
We both know what the issue is but I'm the only one of us two willing to discuss it on DU. LonePirate Mar 2016 #38
Perhaps if the assumption wasn't there that both candidates are "blue" revbones Mar 2016 #26
There is? Plenty? Please direct me to them so I can scream at them the way Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #27
Tell me again why anybody's supposed to care what this guy thinks whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #2
A-FREAKING-MEN GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #4
Did you not get the part where he said dem should vote for either . . . brush Mar 2016 #33
He's a liberal columnist. Trump supporters don't read him much. DanTex Mar 2016 #6
Lol! whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #11
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #12
Maybe DanTex is a secret Trump supporter GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #20
Truth exposed! Boom! nt revbones Mar 2016 #31
Hey, GP. Your post was alerted on. Wilms Mar 2016 #39
What did I do wrong? (so I avoid doing it next time) GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #40
Wondering aloud if DanTex is a Trump supporter. Wilms Mar 2016 #41
Um, cuz he's pro-Hillary and therefore not a right-wing source, which means he's credible... revbones Mar 2016 #30
Counter... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #5
I get it LyndaG Mar 2016 #10
"Hillary or else" is insane. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #14
Worry about PUMAs after the primary Prism Mar 2016 #16
It is crazy... CrowCityDem Mar 2016 #17
It's a Primary Chuck! And I'm still waiting for your candidate to explain her Reagan Love, which Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #19
It appears frustrated_lefty Mar 2016 #24
Isn't that what Senator Sanders said? LyndaG Mar 2016 #34
In any primary... tonedevil Mar 2016 #25
It's called narcissism. Sarandon is just one of many examples that we have observed. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #28
And "Hillary Is Inevitable" is a loser's game. dchill Mar 2016 #29
Good luck with that pengu Mar 2016 #32
I agree with Charles Blow's analysis Gothmog Mar 2016 #35
He doesn't seem to understand UNACCEPTABLE. Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Charles M. Blow: "Bernie ...»Reply #36