Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts) Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:40 AM Mar 2016

Did Hillary Clinton steal Arizona? [View all]

32 votes, 1 pass \| Time left: Unlimited
	Yes
	6 (19%)
	No
	26 (81%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Hillary Clinton steal Arizona? [View all] Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 OP

No. Agschmid Mar 2016 #1

Yet she had no problem delivering a 'victory' speech while thousands still waited to vote? Has she AzDar Mar 2016 #7

Has Bernie claimed a victory in a caucus state? Agschmid Mar 2016 #11

Not answering my question, answered the question... AzDar Mar 2016 #12

... So you are okay with disenfranchising thousands of caucus state voters. Agschmid Mar 2016 #14

... AzDar Mar 2016 #15

The media is the one who should be denounced for announcing a winner while voting was in process still_one Mar 2016 #31

No. The Az govt suppressed voters. jillan Mar 2016 #2

And the local Democrats let it slide randr Mar 2016 #16

Sooooo Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2016 #24

If you don't fight for your rights randr Mar 2016 #40

+1 RepubliCON-Watch Mar 2016 #27

It just happened yesterday!! Things are starting to move today. Protests, local media, organizing jillan Mar 2016 #42

And this will happen again in the general NWCorona Mar 2016 #3

Yup. Agschmid Mar 2016 #6

No, she didn't. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #4

Right now, this looks more like GOP voter suppression. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #5

nice - a smart person MariaThinks Mar 2016 #18

Except... PCPrincess Mar 2016 #21

No, she just benefitted from voter suppression. 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #8

How do you know she benefited? nt Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #9

Many of voters standing in line were Independents. They 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #25

So it's Clinton's fault that there are un-informed voters? n/t SFnomad Mar 2016 #28

Not at all Clinton's "fault". Did she benefit, maybe, probably. 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #35

We've already been told that "low information" voters vote for Hillary, so wouldn't these have too? grossproffit Mar 2016 #36

If they were independent, they couldn't have voted anyway 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #30

sure - because Hillary hasn't won any states on her own and her husband was never President MariaThinks Mar 2016 #19

So you also think Sanders benefits from suppression mythology Mar 2016 #29

its kinda hard to steal a 20% win ericson00 Mar 2016 #10

that's what i said. MariaThinks Mar 2016 #20

I honestly don't know. Someone or something did. nc4bo Mar 2016 #41

Of course not. However that doesn't change the fact that AZ's primary was a total shit show. phleshdef Mar 2016 #13

Is this the 4th or 404th time GD-P has jumped the shark? snooper2 Mar 2016 #17

4004th Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #23

Always able to count on you. . W. 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #26

I think you should have included 'maybe' as an option whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #22

A couple of things to consider... Garrett78 Mar 2016 #32

No, however Bjornsdotter Mar 2016 #33

I think the poll is a bit too black and white. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #34

"I wouldn't even begin to speculate" brooklynite Mar 2016 #37

Read much? bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #38

No, but a precedent must be set for all elections Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #39