Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Removing the super delegates for clarity [View all]beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)28. hillary can sleepwak to get the 42% of the remaining pledge delegats...its the math
and sanders supporters don't want to accept it...just like hillary supporters in 2008....
hillary wins New York, Pennsylvanian, California....just the gains in delegates in those 3 states puts nearly over
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, no, you can't do that now. Superdelegates are a part of Sanders strategy
stevenleser
Mar 2016
#4
And by the way there is close to zero chance of a brokered convention in a two person race.
stevenleser
Mar 2016
#5
If Hillary gets less than 54% AND Bernie gets less than 67.5% where does that lead...
kristopher
Mar 2016
#9
Since all delegates vote it leads to one of the two going over the threshold.
stevenleser
Mar 2016
#12
I have been finding it very curious how the msm always talks about the possibility of a GOP brokered
jillan
Mar 2016
#8
If you understand the process, you know that with only two candidates, its virtually impossible
stevenleser
Mar 2016
#13
hillary can sleepwak to get the 42% of the remaining pledge delegats...its the math
beachbum bob
Mar 2016
#28
Ted Kennedy actually tried to get delegates released from their first round pledges in 80 and failed
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#29
Ted Kennedy wanted for the delegates to be released from their first round pledges.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#34
I don't see anywhere that the minority heavy states benefit more than others.
LiberalFighter
Mar 2016
#61
I don't see how the Mikulski Commission brought about those states going earlier.
LiberalFighter
Mar 2016
#70
I find it disingenuous for Bernie to even be on the ballot after all this time.
LiberalFighter
Mar 2016
#62
Sort of, but with a two-candidate race like this it should really be just a formality.
eomer
Mar 2016
#31
I agree, but that isn't the line the news media is promoting to help Hillary.
kristopher
Mar 2016
#35
And that is why, if Bernie really does pull it off, he will have beaten "the establishment"
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#48
My point is these states have a large amount of delegates and Sanders does poorly among
hrmjustin
Mar 2016
#39
I always like to point out that the Democratic Party is only 31% of the electorate
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#51
Like she did the other night, and *still* only came away with 57 more delegates ...
Myrina
Mar 2016
#50
With all the misleading posts about it being all over, it's nice to get real clarity. NUMBERS
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#43