Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
50. Sad that you side with the Ruling Class. But it makes sense.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:21 PM
Mar 2016

Sooner or later we will take down the corrupt culture of Big Money in politics that you seem to revere. By the way Goldman-Sachs isn't interested helping the 50,000,000 American living in poverty. Are you?

Libya. polly7 Mar 2016 #1
Is it treason for a Secretary of State to do what she reportedly did? grasswire Mar 2016 #7
No. Treason has a very specific definition Scootaloo Mar 2016 #17
well, what is the punishment for betraying POTUS? grasswire Mar 2016 #28
Apparently, being replaced by John kerry Scootaloo Mar 2016 #38
He shoots, he scores!! grasswire Mar 2016 #60
So like, there was a memo, "Don't take advice from this motherfucker"? Scootaloo Mar 2016 #62
Here's a story about it. Wilms Mar 2016 #132
hmm Rich Lowry might be considered a bannable source. grasswire Mar 2016 #136
It's a minefield! Wilms Mar 2016 #145
So, let's untangle some threads, because influence is interesting. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #163
That's what I got...so far. Wilms Mar 2016 #173
oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive grasswire Mar 2016 #182
Here's the NYT story on it in 2009... ljm2002 Mar 2016 #225
I'm no lawyer so can't comment on whether its treason but what seems criminal is snagglepuss Mar 2016 #39
yeah and the Clinton Foundation had him on the payroll. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #44
As I think about it, Hillary's acceptance of his advice when he had a financial snagglepuss Mar 2016 #100
yeah! grasswire Mar 2016 #142
it's crony capitalism at its worst. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #156
I'll take door #2... ljm2002 Mar 2016 #226
Something else about this whole thing that... tex-wyo-dem Mar 2016 #134
that's true, too grasswire Mar 2016 #135
If you distill this all down, the corruption,.. tex-wyo-dem Mar 2016 #140
I agree. grasswire Mar 2016 #141
Yes, pay to play... tex-wyo-dem Mar 2016 #144
I'll speak up here: you are right that the avoidance of FOIA/subpoena is probably the prime motive, leveymg Mar 2016 #185
!!!! grasswire Mar 2016 #192
Not sure that any Fed official can avoid the oversight of the President, unless he agrees to that leveymg Mar 2016 #196
we are really in the weeds now grasswire Mar 2016 #198
By binding Presidential Order and the UCMJ, they are required to send any evidence of espionage up leveymg Mar 2016 #199
As for the head of the NSA at the time, that was Lt. Gen. Keith B. Alexander leveymg Mar 2016 #203
yes grasswire Mar 2016 #204
What, exactly, do you mean by 'Hillary's end run"? nt leveymg Mar 2016 #206
going against Obama's instructions to ban Blumenthal. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #207
Was that Obama's instruction, or Rahm Emanuel's? leveymg Mar 2016 #211
good point nt grasswire Mar 2016 #212
If I did this as a government employee, I'd be in prison shawn703 Mar 2016 #2
Yep, me too. nt Live and Learn Mar 2016 #221
LOL. Can't win with the voters, so try the courts! DanTex Mar 2016 #3
Last I heard no one has won yet, including Hillary berni_mccoy Mar 2016 #11
I guess you're not paying attention then. Hillary sealed it yesterday with a 5-0. DanTex Mar 2016 #21
Oh does that mean she won ALL the delegates? Or some of them? berni_mccoy Mar 2016 #25
She's up by 300+. Insurmountable. Game over. DanTex Mar 2016 #37
I take your responses to mean you see no problems with Beowulf Mar 2016 #103
We need to beat Trump. The email nonsense is a distraction. DanTex Mar 2016 #105
That's such a simplistic response. Beowulf Mar 2016 #114
It's accurate. And Bernie said the same thing in the first debate. DanTex Mar 2016 #116
I guess in your uncomplicated world it is. Beowulf Mar 2016 #117
Man, that is some serious simplistic rational you're peddling... tex-wyo-dem Mar 2016 #133
Guess math isn't your forte. Neither is sportsmanship. nt Live and Learn Mar 2016 #222
Yeah and cannabis_flower Mar 2016 #177
BOOYAH BABY GO HILLARY!!!!! n/t asuhornets Mar 2016 #205
Seriously? Huh? ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #12
I know, it's weird that Bernie fans are so blind to the vote totals. DanTex Mar 2016 #20
I am so sorry for you. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #23
Thank you! I did cut myself shaving yesterday, I appreciate your concern! DanTex Mar 2016 #34
Ig ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #47
No. It's HRC who wants us to ignore that GOP primaries turned out 4 million more than Dems leveymg Mar 2016 #190
LOL. So you think we'd be better of with the candidate who got even less votes than Hillary? DanTex Mar 2016 #193
In the General, where Independents determine the outcome, Bernie is a far better candidate. leveymg Mar 2016 #195
Notice that you didn't respond DanTex. Would like to hear your response, unless you concede that leveymg Mar 2016 #197
Yeah right Politicalboi Mar 2016 #14
I hope your conspiracy theories work out well for you. DanTex Mar 2016 #19
+1 Going Gowdy NCTraveler Mar 2016 #26
So you dispute the information from Hillary's own emails? grasswire Mar 2016 #32
Hillary's history of poor decisions have nothing to do with right wing 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #224
Sad that you side with the Ruling Class. But it makes sense. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #50
I side with Hillary, and with the Democratic electorate. DanTex Mar 2016 #54
LOL. The will of the people. Goldman-Sachs uber alles, right? nm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #101
You know, the whole voting thing that happened. You do believe in Democracy, right? DanTex Mar 2016 #102
And you believe the rich and super-rich should rule, right? Goldman-Sachs will make higher and rhett o rick Mar 2016 #104
No. That's why I support Hillary. DanTex Mar 2016 #107
You do know that her and Bill have amassed $150 million dollars in a short time, all from rhett o rick Mar 2016 #110
LOL. Same old Hillary-bashing. Don't you get bored with it? DanTex Mar 2016 #111
That's your response? I won't stop fighting the domination of the Ruling Class. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #115
Some people are ok with little children going hungry while those at the top get fatter. polly7 Mar 2016 #143
Give it a rest.... tex-wyo-dem Mar 2016 #139
Here ya go, drop your boy a line 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #4
Yup. Going Gowdy. Nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #29
Entitlement, Cheating, Lying, soliciting sympathy, soliciting personal gains from her position,,, orpupilofnature57 Mar 2016 #5
Entitlement indeed. 21st Century Poet Mar 2016 #152
Regardless of whether or not she gets indicted... bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #6
Impeachment papers will be served on Inauguration Day. grasswire Mar 2016 #10
so true AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #146
Once you drink the water from the well . orpupilofnature57 Mar 2016 #13
Two Clinton's Impeached back to back ,how historic . orpupilofnature57 Mar 2016 #18
Well, she can't claim sexism in this case. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #121
Imagine the debates. 840high Mar 2016 #55
And her acolytes won't give a single, solitary fuck. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #113
Maybe Bernie should accept the Veep spot after all? GreenPartyVoter Mar 2016 #150
I can't imagine Mrs Clinton choosing Mr Sanders as Vice President. 21st Century Poet Mar 2016 #154
I can't imagine Bernie accepting a VP spot from Hillary. bvar22 Mar 2016 #216
K&R peacebird Mar 2016 #8
Delicious!!!!!!!! Politicalboi Mar 2016 #9
Just one of many marions ghost Mar 2016 #15
absolutely grasswire Mar 2016 #16
She's had baggage following her 840high Mar 2016 #59
Note: all of this information except for the speculation about what WILL happen to her.. grasswire Mar 2016 #22
The right-wing water is still being carried in this forum Tarc Mar 2016 #24
Sanders did not know then what we know now. grasswire Mar 2016 #40
Nothing new had been revealed Tarc Mar 2016 #112
Some materials are BORN Classified... druidity33 Mar 2016 #155
"Some materials are BORN Classified" Tarc Mar 2016 #161
Er, yes. Yes it is... druidity33 Mar 2016 #172
Analysis from right-wing sources on classification is not gonna cut it Tarc Mar 2016 #175
yes it is, and it's a real term. grasswire Mar 2016 #180
More than you, apparently Tarc Mar 2016 #183
sorry....you revealed your level of knowledge about the matter. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #186
Hillary Clinton, at no time, sent classified material Tarc Mar 2016 #214
did you look up the term "born classified" yet? nt grasswire Mar 2016 #220
does that come before "grasping at straws" Tarc Mar 2016 #223
Ask someone with "Clearance" sometime druidity33 Mar 2016 #213
Information is classified, not the medium of communication. Rilgin Mar 2016 #200
that's what "born classified" info is. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #208
FBI and 2 judges - all right wing? 840high Mar 2016 #66
Let us not forget eggman67 Mar 2016 #131
Thanks for the Summary, But . . . DarthDem Mar 2016 #27
Always a "but." Typical. desmiller Mar 2016 #69
She can buy more Facebook likes & Twitter followers. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #158
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2016 #30
As what I've read, that's a good summary. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #31
FUBAR RobertEarl Mar 2016 #33
the whole thing reeks! going behind Obama's back! Blumenthal had smeared Obama during '08 amborin Mar 2016 #35
Apparently, the last time there was a rogue State Department... grasswire Mar 2016 #43
Keep ******* that chicken. Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #36
I'm sorry, I can't read your mind. grasswire Mar 2016 #41
Can't. Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #42
Do you have anything to say about the facts of the matter... grasswire Mar 2016 #48
Yes. See my first post. Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #52
Bernie loses five states in one night ... NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #45
why do you care? nt grasswire Mar 2016 #46
Actually, I don't. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #75
Being... Else You Are Mad Mar 2016 #90
You are a replying to someone who lives in Canada. grasswire Mar 2016 #94
Sorry Else You Are Mad Mar 2016 #97
That's pretty rich considering that 'demonizing the other candidate' Kentonio Mar 2016 #149
This has nothing to do 840high Mar 2016 #68
And she's still winning. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #86
It's of interest to many 840high Mar 2016 #122
Apparently the majority of Dem voters ... NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #124
Lost? If you call .2% in Missouri and a 1.8% in Illinois wins,,,,well, I guess you could not get a Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #108
The "wins" are based on delegates earned ... NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #118
You (like your candidate) evaded my questions. I guess you will have to google all those candidates Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #125
Ah, yes, of course. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #126
More of the same old bullshit. Nothing new. Hot air without substance. cheapdate Mar 2016 #49
apparently you didn't read. grasswire Mar 2016 #51
I read. Same old shit. She used her personal email server. We know. cheapdate Mar 2016 #78
Those emails again? Meh cosmicone Mar 2016 #53
keep dreaming grasswire Mar 2016 #56
Like ... Dalai Lama? He can't run. n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #63
President Hillary Clinton wyldwolf Mar 2016 #57
Obama must be furious Hydra Mar 2016 #58
it could be seen that way, yes. grasswire Mar 2016 #65
She's not interested in his legacy Hydra Mar 2016 #73
hmmmm grasswire Mar 2016 #76
Yet Bernie wanted to primary Obama redstateblues Mar 2016 #109
yeah, once a campaigning theme is played out it's dropped like an old shoe MisterP Mar 2016 #162
I haven't read all the responses but none said bathroom so .. Jarqui Mar 2016 #61
do you have cite for what you say? grasswire Mar 2016 #67
I read it in a few places .. Jarqui Mar 2016 #80
correct me if I am wrong... grasswire Mar 2016 #83
In the actual quotes I made, they reveal what the CEO of the firm said Jarqui Mar 2016 #96
consider this October article from Politico grasswire Mar 2016 #130
I've seen so much reporting on at least some of the delete emails being Jarqui Mar 2016 #151
Ok. Let us assume she royally screwed up from "banned advisors" to IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #64
Because his legacy is at stake. 840high Mar 2016 #72
...and she is claiming to preserve his legacy. grasswire Mar 2016 #77
yep 840high Mar 2016 #123
thank you for good questions grasswire Mar 2016 #74
I am sceptical of Obama not knowing SOME of the issues - IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #87
"or she has something to keep her safe" grasswire Mar 2016 #92
Here is an interesting story... IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #202
Throughout Hillary's career there have been many attempts to bring her down by folks with scandals upaloopa Mar 2016 #70
I defended the Clintons for years. grasswire Mar 2016 #79
You don't know the Clintons. upaloopa Mar 2016 #81
Because I believe the American people deserve a president... grasswire Mar 2016 #88
Nobody agrees with you. You are part of some tiny group with an axe to grind. upaloopa Mar 2016 #91
sure grasswire Mar 2016 #93
Look at the votes she has gotten in the primary for your self. You don't ask questions you try to upaloopa Mar 2016 #95
I did the same FOR the Clintons when they were under attack by the GOP. grasswire Mar 2016 #98
I agree with him. Millions of other Americans agree, too. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #164
... BlindTiresias Mar 2016 #219
Wow... deathrind Mar 2016 #71
Bill Clinton had to be involved in this one. bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #82
Sounds about right. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #129
He was paying Blumenthal $120k a year. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #167
yep pay to play grasswire Mar 2016 #181
Nope nothinh to see here... Else You Are Mad Mar 2016 #84
Paid for through the foundation. Rofl. RedCappedBandit Mar 2016 #85
LOL grasswire Mar 2016 #89
Doesn't matter. HassleCat Mar 2016 #99
Blumenthal is the new Chalabi. What does it make Clinton? nt thereismore Mar 2016 #106
Damn. Damn. grasswire Mar 2016 #119
The derp is strong captain! rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #120
I remember how cool it was that Obama got to keep using his ALBliberal Mar 2016 #127
yes, I remember. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #128
If Bernie's supporters had put this much effort into supporting BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #137
way to win support for your side...........not nt grasswire Mar 2016 #138
Sounds like you just fell off the turnip truck Art_from_Ark Mar 2016 #147
What on earth is the matter with that woman? senz Mar 2016 #148
Fake republican scandal is fake. sufrommich Mar 2016 #153
Drip, drip, drip, drip.... PonyUp Mar 2016 #157
They need to either clear her or charge her and get it over with ASAP. Vinca Mar 2016 #159
The FBI most likely is not concerned about the timing. mmonk Mar 2016 #171
The fact they aren't rushing to end it is making me fear the worst. Vinca Mar 2016 #179
And your sources for these comments are...? spooky3 Mar 2016 #160
news FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #170
Why are there no links to the "news"? spooky3 Mar 2016 #174
If Clinton wins Presidency, it will be endless crap and probably rgbecker Mar 2016 #165
And a few more pro-Bernie OPs gets pushed a little deeper down the GDP stack. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #166
Framing is important. Email scandal makes people roll their eyes. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #168
Oh brother. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #169
true dat -- it's not an "email scandal" grasswire Mar 2016 #184
Sounds trustworthy and reliable to me! arcane1 Mar 2016 #176
Does Anyone have Credible fredamae Mar 2016 #178
This is beginning to look like the "House of Cards". It's all about power and money. jalan48 Mar 2016 #187
yes grasswire Mar 2016 #188
Maybe it's always been this way-it's just so blatant with the Clintons. jalan48 Mar 2016 #189
I present to you, the Indictment Fairy Tarc Mar 2016 #191
to quote astute DU-er leveymg grasswire Mar 2016 #194
I think what you are missing is that the email is the paper trail IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #201
She's super qualified! Prism Mar 2016 #209
This is how she does business Lazy Daisy Mar 2016 #210
It makes me ill to think of what will happen to millions more around the world who've suffered polly7 Mar 2016 #217
Rich and powerful people set their own rules. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #215
This should not be in "primaries" but in GD, perhaps. Or foreign affairs lostnfound Mar 2016 #218
With all the trouble with terrorists why did she have a private server Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2016 #227
That's what I'd like to know. pacalo Mar 2016 #228
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #229
you are welcome, Uncle Joe. grasswire Mar 2016 #230
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»so here's what we know fr...»Reply #50