Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DrFunkenstein

(8,745 posts)
63. Is That Why The E-Mails Were Released On Friday Evenings Before Primaries?
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:47 PM
Mar 2016

If the timing of the debates was suspect, the timing of the releases of the e-mails to the media was impeccable. If you want no one to notice them.

Some notables: The one where she talks about her role in the legitimating the Honduras coup, and the one with her aides describing the massive weapons sale she lined up for Saudi Arabia as a "Christmas present."

http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2015/07/emails-show-secretary-clinton-disobeyed-obama-policy-and-continued-fund

https://theintercept.com/2016/02/22/saudi-christmas-present/

Kickin' Faux pas Mar 2016 #1
OP headline differs somewhat from headline of linked article 6chars Mar 2016 #2
It's not posted as LBN so the headline doesn't have to match, but... thesquanderer Mar 2016 #66
Thanks. You said it better than me. 6chars Mar 2016 #67
Boom. revbones Mar 2016 #3
Said by a spokesman for a Republican. Metric System Mar 2016 #7
Actually, said by someone that respects the truth revbones Mar 2016 #10
Yes, Republicans respect the truth. Metric System Mar 2016 #13
Hillary supporters are funny. revbones Mar 2016 #15
You're the one quoting and agreeing with a Republican. Metric System Mar 2016 #17
Does that make the statement any less relevant or true? revbones Mar 2016 #19
Wait so now Gwhittey Mar 2016 #21
Didn't Clinton say something about getting things done through "bipartisanship" very recently? ish of the hammer Mar 2016 #37
so it's ok for Clinton to work with republicans, ish of the hammer Mar 2016 #39
Gwhittey, the irony is hilarious. Nitram Mar 2016 #48
"kill the messenger"? amborin Mar 2016 #12
Time for her to step aside and hire a criminal defense lawyer AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #4
My fear is that we're watching a Pres. candidate version of Blanche from A Streetcar Named Desire Fawke Em Mar 2016 #30
Hillary's campaign is tanking... once she drops out, Obama will no doubt pardon her. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2016 #76
"Houston we have a problem" This could blowup in our faces awake Mar 2016 #5
It could blow up in the faces of those LWolf Mar 2016 #6
If this comes down after the convention and Hillary is the nominee then we all are going down awake Mar 2016 #8
Of course, LWolf Mar 2016 #14
Not hardly. -none Mar 2016 #18
President of the United States you mean. Gwhittey Mar 2016 #23
I was thinking of the primary. -none Mar 2016 #26
They call them "trustys" in the joint. Fuddnik Mar 2016 #35
The immature glee in the Bernster posts above is revealing. Nitram Mar 2016 #50
Not to worry... Bernie is here to save the day! InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2016 #78
The New York Times creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #80
Yup... kenfrequed Mar 2016 #81
I saw somewhere - not a Rethug website - that 150 FBI agents are on the case. Why so many I wonder?! InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2016 #77
This could turn out to be bigger than Watergate Merryland Mar 2016 #9
OK, Merry, now you've jumped the shark. Nitram Mar 2016 #51
How do you know it was never hacked? NWCorona Mar 2016 #55
How do you know it was? Nitram Mar 2016 #57
I can't for certain. NWCorona Mar 2016 #58
But it is absolutely certain that the government server has been hacked more than once. Nitram Mar 2016 #60
Even if true that doesn't make it right NWCorona Mar 2016 #61
Watergate? bpj62 Mar 2016 #59
I see a solution to this problem Jenny_92808 Mar 2016 #11
You made up that headline. That is not what it says. n/t Lil Missy Mar 2016 #16
That's it? nichomachus Mar 2016 #24
Please notice that the subject line is not in quotes; it is not intended as a headline, amborin Mar 2016 #28
That's the first time I've seen an estimate of when the inquiry will conclude. winter is coming Mar 2016 #20
and THEN what happens will be the question. n/t dana_b Mar 2016 #32
The Clintonite enablers in Congress are trying to push the usual Clinton Persecution Syndrome TwilightGardener Mar 2016 #22
That's all they have- marew Mar 2016 #29
There is no "there" BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #31
Pushing a "scandal"? This is a federal law enforcement investigation. It exists, and is serious. TwilightGardener Mar 2016 #34
They have also said that BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #36
I think you have your facts wrong. They're not going to announce who their target is. TwilightGardener Mar 2016 #38
Right, Gardener, you and your hubbie know more about the subject than a former lawyer with the DoS. Nitram Mar 2016 #52
I think he's wrong. I don't automatically defer to anyone's claim of expertise, especially TwilightGardener Mar 2016 #62
Well, tough toenails to you BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #68
The article says creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #83
That's the State Dept. IG's earlier findings (Linick) --different from the FBI's investigation. TwilightGardener Mar 2016 #85
They didn't offer him immunity over any crime creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #82
I've read otherwise--that the federal government is pretty stingy with immunity. TwilightGardener Mar 2016 #84
How the fuck do you know FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #45
Thanks for the links you provided. pugetres Mar 2016 #25
Did the bar just leap from "offical state dept. business" past "classified" to "top secret"? merrily Mar 2016 #27
K&R. dchill Mar 2016 #33
What the hell is she thinking? Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #40
k&r for a great discussion and factual links saidsimplesimon Mar 2016 #41
I think a surprise is coming.. speaktruthtopower Mar 2016 #42
Whomever fucked up, it was on her watch! Divernan Mar 2016 #44
oooo... that sounds interesting.. dana_b Mar 2016 #46
A surprise and a lot of disappointment in the Bernie Camp. Nitram Mar 2016 #53
cheer up Pat Riots Mar 2016 #79
drip . . . . drip . . . drip . . drip . drip.Drip.DRIP-DRIP!-DRIP!!-DRIP!!!!!! Divernan Mar 2016 #43
It's somewhat humorous and disgusting that those that claim that Hillary is a Republican Trust Buster Mar 2016 #47
WAKE UP - Hillary's emails which were on her home server are part of a FBI investigation ! awake Mar 2016 #64
Chuck Grassley ? He was the guy quoted in the OP. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #69
" a referral to the F.B.I., which then became a criminal investigation. " awake Mar 2016 #70
Do I sense it correctly that the Clinton camp are thereismore Mar 2016 #49
No. Nitram Mar 2016 #54
Yes...you are correct noiretextatique Mar 2016 #72
the Inspector General of the CIA is nominated by and reports to the President, not Congress. magical thyme Mar 2016 #56
Is That Why The E-Mails Were Released On Friday Evenings Before Primaries? DrFunkenstein Mar 2016 #63
For God's sake, stop posting this crap! HenryWallace Mar 2016 #65
You wish this was about a right wing witch hunt over Benghazi awake Mar 2016 #71
If it is a RW witch-hunt, Obama is the ringleader noiretextatique Mar 2016 #73
good one awake Mar 2016 #74
Basically the same thing you said noiretextatique Mar 2016 #75
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC Clearly Worried About...»Reply #63