2016 Postmortem

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)

68. Hillarians are so silly.

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 01:34 PM

Mar 2016

These weak "vetting" stories are cute. When does the insanity stop. You see what I did there. I responded to a Hillary post the same way Hillary supporters go into posts that are pro Bernie. You know what I am talking about. Some of you folks go in and try to insult instead of back up any argument.

Also, you should be ashamed for thinking it is appropriate to attack Jane Sanders. I already know what you're going to say, "you are attacking Bill..." well, he happened to be a President, one who actually pushed laws and policies that aided in the continuing destruction of the lower and middle classes.

GO BERNIE!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

110 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jane and Bernie Sanders collaboration to move Vt's nuclear waste [View all] Fla Dem Mar 2016 OP

Things like this deserve more scrutiny. People deserve to know. NurseJackie Mar 2016 #1

Did you admire the late Texas Gov. Ann Richards? Armstead Mar 2016 #3

This again? That facility was opened up 6 years earlier, billed as a Yucca Mountain-type solution. TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #35

Hillary; Nuclear Waste; Yucca Mountain kristopher Mar 2016 #85

Activist Bill Addington: "But Bernie was not alone, so why are they singling him out?" KoKo Mar 2016 #87

Just like singling out Hillary for being there when others take actions we don't like. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #107

Bernie has not been vetted. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #2

Exactly pandr32 Mar 2016 #62

LOL. What the do you think Brock has been doing with his tens of millions? mhatrw Mar 2016 #89

Glad to give it a big 5 REC riversedge Mar 2016 #4

Not so pure. It's about time Sanders' actions livetohike Mar 2016 #5

"Shoving this down people's throats is not progressive politics. It was business as usual." R B Garr Mar 2016 #6

Like the Fraking Queen has been vetted? Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #40

"Authority still went ahead and picked the site because the people living there R B Garr Mar 2016 #44

Nice job quoting Hillary backer as source. Lets talk about radioactive waste, and polution et al. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #54

Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #56

You say that as if Hillary didn't vote to literally dump Nuke Waste on poor people. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #60

Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #71

I tried, but I spit my milk when I read this on your pro-hill blog link... Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #81

More typical and well-worn tactics R B Garr Mar 2016 #84

Probably because cannabis_flower Mar 2016 #82

There are always "reasons', aren't there... R B Garr Mar 2016 #83

It isn't that he gets a pass cannabis_flower Mar 2016 #109

Whose quoted words are those? Brock's or just one of Brock's paid minions? nt mhatrw Mar 2016 #90

I suppose you're rather ruin all New England, NY, NJ and the millions of minorities who live therein Armstead Mar 2016 #70

Bernie is not the saint he is sold as. R B Garr Mar 2016 #72

Please answer my question Armstead Mar 2016 #73

Nobody is a saint. Everybody has warts. All things are relative. mhatrw Mar 2016 #91

You have to credit him for evolving his nuclear action. intheflow Mar 2016 #105

K&R! stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #7

K&R!!! lunamagica Mar 2016 #8

Orders appear to have been given with respect to Jane Sanders. Barack_America Mar 2016 #9

No, if "orders had been given with respect BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #11

Bill signed the bill that sent the waste to Texas. nt ladjf Mar 2016 #13

LOL. BUT SANDERS ONCE DID THE SAME THING CLINTON DID!!! mhatrw Mar 2016 #92

Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #25

Hillarians are so silly. TrueDemVA Mar 2016 #68

I guess you don't like Ann Richards either....She pushed the idea Armstead Mar 2016 #10

Liked Ann Richards, but she was a politician just as BS is a politician Fla Dem Mar 2016 #12

Nobody (not most anyway) are claiiming he's Simon Pure ot denying he's a poltician Armstead Mar 2016 #16

The disposal of nuclear waste is a terrible problem. ladjf Mar 2016 #21

+1 n/t LittleGirl Mar 2016 #47

LittleGirl has a BigMind . nt ladjf Mar 2016 #48

My head LittleGirl Mar 2016 #88

I am from MN and our iron range was also looked at as a jwirr Mar 2016 #61

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #94

That indicates two good things: 1. the people from Vermont ladjf Mar 2016 #99

Here's the 08 version of 'Hillay's horrid rival dumps nuclear waste on the poor': Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #23

Dirty tricks are all Hillary's campaign and supporters know BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #30

Well sure but they should work up some new ones because no one likes reruns, it's bad dynamics Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #69

LOL. Always going back to the same hypocritical poisoned wells! nt mhatrw Mar 2016 #93

Ann made mistakes. okasha Mar 2016 #104

Wasn't this topic brought up before? Snotcicles Mar 2016 #14

I believe this is the 4th time its come around Arazi Mar 2016 #18

Dose it count as environmentalism? It is recycling, right? lol. nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #22

Yes, but some might have missed it. MoonRiver Mar 2016 #24

That's fine with me, especially when it exposes the hypocrisy of Clinton supporters. nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #28

Hypocrisy? MoonRiver Mar 2016 #49

Hypocrisy in raking Sanders over the coals for a supporting a law Bill Clinton signed mhatrw Mar 2016 #95

Take a look at the timeframe. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #15

Bernie made a yuuuuuuggggeee amount of money from that -- NOT Armstead Mar 2016 #17

That's what it's about? Nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #19

That's what cronyism is about -- What did the Sanders gain personally from any of this? Armstead Mar 2016 #20

Influence which does often lead to money. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #26

First it isn't cronyism Armstead Mar 2016 #63

You are the one that said cronyism in this conversation. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #79

Or simply someone being appointed to a post because appointers think she might be good for the post Armstead Mar 2016 #80

It's also good to know what really did get dumped in Sierra Blanca and by whom.... Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #27

Clinton's unwavering stance on nuclear power and nuclear waste magical thyme Mar 2016 #29

And this is damaging to HRC how? She oppsed the Yucca site because environmentally it Fla Dem Mar 2016 #51

in 20008. Now she's taking their money and suddenly not so opposed, and in the meantime magical thyme Mar 2016 #59

I'm certainly not reading that into the links you posted. Fla Dem Mar 2016 #74

There are no safe sites Armstead Mar 2016 #64

I totally agree. nt Fla Dem Mar 2016 #78

and Hillary's better? retrowire Mar 2016 #31

Not saying what BS did was wrong, but he voted for his constituents against his progressive Fla Dem Mar 2016 #43

Vermont's backyard and water system and wind patterns includes MILLIONS of people.... Armstead Mar 2016 #65

Old, old, old story...this was tried MONTHS ago to portray Bernie SoapBox Mar 2016 #32

It's all they've got to work with. They must tear down Sanders to HRCs septic tank level nc4bo Mar 2016 #34

They're ramping up the rotation again. bvf Mar 2016 #36

It may be an old situation, but no older than some of the crap brought up on HRC. Fla Dem Mar 2016 #39

An undergrad from Harvard floated a new hit piece ladjf Mar 2016 #67

that whole site is nothing but one big pro Hillary, anti Bernie propaganda dana_b Mar 2016 #97

Another post by Hillary supporters who want us to 'come together now'. nt navarth Mar 2016 #33

So we should just give up while you continue to bash HRC. Coming together Fla Dem Mar 2016 #57

Bashing = bad. Pointing out facts = fair. IMO navarth Mar 2016 #106

Bernie wasn't the only co-sponsor, there were 23...many dems from TX angstlessk Mar 2016 #37

Yes because it benefited the Texas energy companies. The Maine senators voted Fla Dem Mar 2016 #41

And Gov. Ann Richards was a major champion of it. Armstead Mar 2016 #66

Saturday in the park. Autumn Mar 2016 #38

'President Bill Clinton signed the bill into law' Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #42

His veto would have been overturned. nt Fla Dem Mar 2016 #46

Bill Clinton could have vetoed and urged Congressional Democrats to oppose Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #50

Just like the worst environmental situation in Texas is Loki Mar 2016 #45

You have a point here. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #52

Did Ann Richards agree with Bernie when she was pushing for the site involved? Armstead Mar 2016 #75

Hey . . . Texas wanted it. Vinca Mar 2016 #53

they're very good at hiding and dismissing the effects MisterP Mar 2016 #58

K & R for exposure. nt SunSeeker Mar 2016 #55

K&R mcar Mar 2016 #76

That was wrong, a case of environmental racism. HassleCat Mar 2016 #77

As of today, there are nine Commissioners (one of them an alternate) on TLLRWDA.... George II Mar 2016 #86

Who is more pro-nuke power and who is more anti-nuke power of Clinton and Sanders? mhatrw Mar 2016 #96

Sure, just dump it in a town with a large Hispanic population and... George II Mar 2016 #98

Where is the radioactive waste now? Did those right next to where it is now get any say in this? mhatrw Mar 2016 #102

Its all in the linked article. George II Mar 2016 #103

k&r DesertRat Mar 2016 #100

Thanks. Missed this. Bernie is just another not in my backyard politician itsrobert Mar 2016 #101

Just this. Bernie has truly not been vetted yet. Clearly not like Hillary has. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #108

Jane "made-off" Sanders still sits on the board - Warning to California Residents MadamX2016 Apr 2016 #110