2016 Postmortem

jpb33

(141 posts)

327. No Shame

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:41 AM

Mar 2016

No shame at all. Plus she knows she can get away with it because the press won't call her on it, they will not even mention it. And Hillary's followers will either make an excuse for her, or they will rationalize it, or they will deflect, or they will try attack the source of the information, or they just do not mind.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

337 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Paid Herself $250,000 From Campaign Funds [View all] DesMoinesDem Mar 2016 OP

Wow. I can't believe she'd do that. PatrickforO Mar 2016 #1

HOW DARE SHE! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #37

she has no clue how bad this looks and neither do you roguevalley Mar 2016 #64

Also, THE FREE BEACON IS RIGHT-WING CRAP. SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #143

Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #174

"Although it is legal" shenmue Mar 2016 #177

there's something about crossing into 6 figures that sorta raises alarms PatrynXX Mar 2016 #98

This is a Right Wing site !! SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #124

IF the OP is the same site, doesn't that make it fair game? Amimnoch Mar 2016 #140

Yeah, I figured someone would try to use this excuse. But look at your article, genius. upperatmos Mar 2016 #154

more wage theft scscholar Mar 2016 #170

you're both assuming it was 2 full years, magical thyme Mar 2016 #250

I think that's pretty standard actually. Bubzer Mar 2016 #67

I can't believe she'd do that. AlbertCat Mar 2016 #100

Debunked in post 58. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #329

...but, according to Hillary, $15/hr Minimum Wage it too much for the peasants. bvar22 Mar 2016 #279

No matter what else happens, "Hillary gonna get PAID!" razorman Mar 2016 #301

once again, as if more proof were needed... Merryland Mar 2016 #2

HOW DARE SHE! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #39

And that's a valid point of criticism NWCorona Mar 2016 #47

His wife also worked for years for no pay. Can you name a year on record that polly7 Mar 2016 #51

What's the salary for a First Lady? HillareeeHillaraah Mar 2016 #145

I didn't realize First Lady was a salaried position??? polly7 Mar 2016 #166

She didn't, we don't. HillareeeHillaraah Mar 2016 #172

And??? Why would she be paid, again? polly7 Mar 2016 #181

I'm lost as to your point here... HillareeeHillaraah Mar 2016 #190

My point is that Jane Sanders worked for free in an actual position that would have given polly7 Mar 2016 #195

You don't believe that First Lady of the United States of America in the 21st Century HillareeeHillaraah Mar 2016 #226

You have no idea what I 'believe' even though I just tried to spell out to you polly7 Mar 2016 #273

I believe that Jane was prohibited from drawing a salary owing to nepotism rules. MADem Mar 2016 #334

It is not illegal for a reason ... earthside Mar 2016 #115

Please, send me money so I can pay myself for running for President. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #182

K&R Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #3

Hahahahaha! You people who sent her money, now you know where it went. So sad! nt thereismore Mar 2016 #4

O U C H !! That's gonna leave a mark tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #77

Actually most of it goes to polling firms as she tries to buy a clue. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2016 #95

read either of JaneyVee's posts above SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #128

I can't do that. That poster is on ignore. nt thereismore Mar 2016 #142

OK, here it is: SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #147

Yes. He paid his campaign workers, she paid herself. Still laughing. thereismore Mar 2016 #161

You must not have read the article SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #239

? Matariki Mar 2016 #222

250,000 "I'm not kidding, Maddis" jfern Mar 2016 #318

Eh - if she needs more money she'll just contact Goldman Sachs. jillan Mar 2016 #5

Yes - yes... Plucketeer Mar 2016 #216

Guess which Clinton made $600,000 a year right out of college? marew Mar 2016 #332

Is that legal? Matariki Mar 2016 #6

my same question amborin Mar 2016 #14

didn't Rubio do that too? amborin Mar 2016 #15

From the article... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #17

She gave up her job as a paid speaker at Goldman. Downwinder Mar 2016 #21

I wonder what she was saying to them... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #23

You'd think Bill would get up off his ass and get a job BuelahWitch Mar 2016 #204

OP was completely debunked by Skinner himself. You should read the thread. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #272

Too much scrolling. Sorry, not sorry. n/t BuelahWitch Mar 2016 #286

Legal is not a word in the Clinton Dictionary. n/t PonyUp Mar 2016 #43

Remember Sarah Palin bought a whole new wardrobe with jwirr Mar 2016 #151

I believe so democrattotheend Mar 2016 #314

Maybe you can link breitbart or the Blaze while you're at it Godhumor Mar 2016 #7

Refute the information or not JackInGreen Mar 2016 #10

How about the FEC? Wilms Mar 2016 #11

That's a tough messenger to shoot!! Well played. :) nt Jarqui Mar 2016 #18

The poster was a sitting duck. Wilms Mar 2016 #22

Well played indeed! NWCorona Mar 2016 #49

Too bad they missed. Terribly Godhumor Mar 2016 #219

Sure, right to the source. Godhumor Mar 2016 #63

Yes it's true CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #45

Data in the article comes from the Federal Election Commission Herman4747 Mar 2016 #46

Remember, she was in poverty when she left the white house! Give her a break! Nt Logical Mar 2016 #8

Destitute, I tell ya. PonyUp Mar 2016 #48

Kee-Ryst! yallerdawg Mar 2016 #85

Uncertain future? LMAO. What will the Clinton family do being out of work with millions of dollars? PonyUp Mar 2016 #126

I will never say the Clinton's were broke. That would be a slap to all the hard working Americans NWCorona Mar 2016 #60

ruined by bill. no sympathy there roguevalley Mar 2016 #65

That really isn't the point I'm making. NWCorona Mar 2016 #69

So poor that she left the white house with a few white house items to pawn. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #108

I know - I felt so sorry for her. 840high Mar 2016 #269

It seems running for Prez pays better than Goldman/Sachs speeches. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #9

SNAP! Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #110

What is it with the Clinton's and pushing loopholes to the limit? NWCorona Mar 2016 #12

greed & arrogance. Merryland Mar 2016 #27

Exactly! They are in it for themselves NWCorona Mar 2016 #35

It never ends... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #13

And Palin couldn't accept a new wardrobe? TexasMommaWithAHat Mar 2016 #16

Aaaand look at all the "poisoning the well" tomfoolery that's followed your OP! Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #19

My Lady Friend Gets Two Or Three Solicitation E-Mails A Day From The Clinton Campaign For $'s.... global1 Mar 2016 #20

I think they ask for $1 to claim more individual donations Merryland Mar 2016 #30

A bunch of $1 contributions will drag down their average contribution BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #72

She's giving her contributors a big discount BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #73

Bingo. jwirr Mar 2016 #169

Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT. fleur-de-lisa Mar 2016 #24

Someone doesn't want the truth out NWCorona Mar 2016 #41

Embarrassing and enlightening at the same time tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #75

Disturbing elljay Mar 2016 #99

One of my pet peeves too... Ino Mar 2016 #117

Jury voted to leave it. fleur-de-lisa Mar 2016 #139

I know elljay Mar 2016 #153

This would never happen in Russia. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #113

What the actual fuck. Somebody has a hurt. Sorry, alerter, that you gave her money. nt thereismore Mar 2016 #122

I was juror #1. MineralMan Mar 2016 #138

She must have given herself a speech. (n/t) thesquanderer Mar 2016 #25

thanks - first laugh of the day. Merryland Mar 2016 #31

+2! NWCorona Mar 2016 #42

LOL. Good one. n/t PonyUp Mar 2016 #50

DUzy Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #114

Oh, wow! More irrelevant s _ _T looking for a wall. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #26

That's peanuts, it's only pay for one-hour's work... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #28

Disgusting. She's in this for HERSELF. closeupready Mar 2016 #29

A girl has to have some spending money. Downwinder Mar 2016 #33

HOW DARE SHE! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #40

You are repeating yourself. Downwinder Mar 2016 #74

Nothing wrong with that... Agschmid Mar 2016 #121

It is when it is a false equivalency and TM99 Mar 2016 #137

Man that last line is a bit over the top... Agschmid Mar 2016 #141

Well aware. TM99 Mar 2016 #267

You are not educated on that which you are speaking. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #194

Isn't Freebeacon a frepper site? kydo Mar 2016 #32

Joe Schoffstall, a rightwing asshole, with an article in a right wing paper. still_one Mar 2016 #34

are you suggesting they made up the FEC filings? Or it doesn't matter because the MSM didn't report magical thyme Mar 2016 #52

biased news sources are only allowed noamnety Mar 2016 #57

Oh look, Clinton bashing from the Washington Free Beacon... SidDithers Mar 2016 #36

Hillary must be doing better than we realized! :-D NurseJackie Mar 2016 #55

This message was self-deleted by its author Herman4747 Mar 2016 #59

And yet the poster chose to link to the Washington Free Beacon... SidDithers Mar 2016 #88

You can't expect the FEC to do it ... but you can do it yourself. GeorgeGist Mar 2016 #89

How can you even post that after reading Skinner's post #58?... SidDithers Mar 2016 #90

Because it doesn't matter to the poster that it's a lie. okasha Mar 2016 #270

No wonder she was bullying Maddi for that dollar! noamnety Mar 2016 #38

Found the link I'm not kidding Maddie Autumn Mar 2016 #56

Maddie now we know why she needed that dollar Autumn Mar 2016 #44

I'm not kidding Maddie!! CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #53

LOL polly7 Mar 2016 #54

This is a quirk of FEC reporting. Skinner Mar 2016 #58

Alright, Your FINE EXPLANATION is most satisfactory... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #68

And yet you allow it to persist. sufrommich Mar 2016 #70

NOT EVERYONE HAS TRAINING IN ACCOUNTING... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #76

Maybe your first clue should have been the source used.nt sufrommich Mar 2016 #78

I personally wasn't willing to accept the right-wing rag... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #80

It happens fast and the right wing has been doing it for years. Agschmid Mar 2016 #107

Yup. Agschmid Mar 2016 #105

Just remember the Rude Pundit's wise words. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #79

Look, I did go the FEC website! Herman4747 Mar 2016 #82

EVERYONE, I RECOMMEND THAT YOU SEE SKINNER'S FINE POST, #58! n/t Herman4747 Mar 2016 #84

Replied to wrong post. MineralMan Mar 2016 #133

Yes, and might raise an eyebrow at obviously phony claims. Hortensis Mar 2016 #225

You should alert on him. n/t Wilms Mar 2016 #83

+1!!! obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #255

Thanks for this. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #87

I am the treasurer for a Texas GPAC and two candidates Gothmog Mar 2016 #91

Oh you mean "accounting". Agschmid Mar 2016 #101

Thanks for the insight on this. Is this a common issues NWCorona Mar 2016 #118

Thanks, Skinner. MineralMan Mar 2016 #127

Is there anyway to determine what the "in kind" contribution was? noamnety Mar 2016 #144

What on earth is there to change your mind about? Skinner Mar 2016 #149

Thank you for this reply! hamsterjill Mar 2016 #164

I was trying to understand noamnety Mar 2016 #165

To answer your question... Kensan Mar 2016 #264

"The OP is false. Period." - Why? Because you say so? Bubzer Mar 2016 #208

I'm wondering also what a quarter of a million 'in kind' looks like tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #212

My point is that the OP is false no matter what the in-kind contribution was. Skinner Mar 2016 #258

My issue was this: You could have easily posted a link at a request instead of stone-walling. Bubzer Mar 2016 #281

But people who don't understand the intricacies of the FEC onenote Mar 2016 #315

The inoculant to disinformation is fact. No one benefits by refusing to share facts. Bubzer Mar 2016 #316

True. But engaging in some due diligence before buying into something from a rw site onenote Mar 2016 #319

I do agree. Bubzer Mar 2016 #320

I think the better thing would have been for the OP, after acknowledging the article was misleading, onenote Mar 2016 #321

Can't argue with that. It takes strength to admit being wrong... so there's cetainly no harm in it. Bubzer Mar 2016 #323

Why don't you try READING the post--it explains it all, quite simply, too. MADem Mar 2016 #268

Welcome to our world Skinner. Loki Mar 2016 #217

HAHAHA BEAT ME TO IT obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #256

your link was interesting tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #210

Thanks. I didn't even get into the guts of the report to see that, since this essentially.... George II Mar 2016 #155

Thank you, Skinner! SunSeeker Mar 2016 #168

To be fair, I didn't hear about tit on Free Beacon (whatever that is). I heard of it on DU. silvershadow Mar 2016 #184

I think the "butthurt" (your word) is justified. Skinner Mar 2016 #223

"It is a massive fail" obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #276

Do Hosts have the authority to lock a disruptive thread linking to a right-wing source?... SidDithers Mar 2016 #289

Uh, yeah. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #291

+1 MaggieD Mar 2016 #308

Indeed. It's like there's nothing that can be done KitSileya Mar 2016 #325

Sad, indeed NastyRiffraff Mar 2016 #330

Skinner, also sad are the recommendations that a troll with only 24 posts.... George II Mar 2016 #297

I find that far worse than the hourly use of RW sources here. zappaman Mar 2016 #306

Except people aren't "moving on" onenote Mar 2016 #229

Why don't you, as a Sanders supporter, urge the OP to delete this pile of steaming Free Beacon crap? MADem Mar 2016 #274

I am not anyone's keeper, but I will try anyway. Perhaps it is a troll? I have no idea. silvershadow Mar 2016 #280

I'm not issuing an order, just offering a suggestion. You're your own boss, of course. MADem Mar 2016 #283

Oh, so now this too is the fault of "Hillary supporters?" yardwork Mar 2016 #331

Thanks Skinner. I was looking through the FCC and didn't understand that. Autumn Mar 2016 #198

I've trying tom find info about this type of contribution FEC wasn't helpful but IRS was azurnoir Mar 2016 #220

Go to the FEC website and download her entire 7/15/215 REPORT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Skinner Mar 2016 #247

thanks but I was more looking for a definition of in kind contribution IRS was helpful with that azurnoir Mar 2016 #293

Can you give us an idea of what she gave her campaign on April 13th that was worth $74,000? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #284

Thanks. for information. Lets take the OP down. riversedge Mar 2016 #300

Gee, are we donating enough? NowSam Mar 2016 #61

Free bacon! Dem2 Mar 2016 #62

yes there are mercuryblues Mar 2016 #96

Wingnut lies that would get downvoted to oblivion on reddit - a site that allows Republicans Dem2 Mar 2016 #285

the problem is mercuryblues Mar 2016 #305

If I were donating to her I'd be a bit upset kracer20 Mar 2016 #66

Why aren't you upset about right wing propaganda being posted on DU? SunSeeker Mar 2016 #160

Give her a break RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #71

Since you are making fun of how other people look DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #119

He's not running for president; she is. closeupready Mar 2016 #132

Your pal DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #146

She's running for president. Deal with it. closeupready Mar 2016 #176

You and your pal have every right to call... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #187

Is that her campaign strategy, Hillary Clinton, victim-in-chief? closeupready Mar 2016 #197

If I said women of a certain age look like shriveled up raisins I would want to change the subject DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #205

Thanks for this obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #259

Let's try an experiment. treestar Mar 2016 #335

My hair and makeup don't cost that much RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #152

There are no ugly people, just misinformed observers. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #157

Oh believe me when I tell you RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #159

I am sure there are people in your life who find you attractive. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #162

Nope not a one. RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #167

Making fun of how an over-60 female politican looks obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #257

Yes, this is what DU has become. Awful. :( Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #277

yup obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #278

Sadly, there are some immature jerks here masquerading as progressives onenote Mar 2016 #304

yet we don't dare call any Bernie supporter sexist at any time dsc Mar 2016 #265

Meanwhile RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #271

Why? Does she figure there's a per hour rate for running for president? Vinca Mar 2016 #81

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Mar 2016 #322

"Also, THE FREE BEACON IS RIGHT-WING CRAP." fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #86

I'm assuming you will be self-deleting now, right? N/t Godhumor Mar 2016 #92

The founder of the Free Beacon is Michael Goldfarb. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #93

Are the Clintons broke again? Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #94

Thanks to Skinner for debunking a right wing meme that shouldn't have been posted here onenote Mar 2016 #97

Yup. Agschmid Mar 2016 #109

Pocket change. CentralMass Mar 2016 #102

Anyone know how much Sanders is paying himself and family members? George II Mar 2016 #103

He isn't paying himself anything--he gets a salary from his Senate gig. MADem Mar 2016 #112

Thanks. My question was borderline rhetorical. What the OP "uncovered" is not uncommon at all.... George II Mar 2016 #129

Except Hillary isn't paying herself from her campaign. Skinner Mar 2016 #134

Thanks. I responded up there, too. George II Mar 2016 #156

Of course she isn't. But the counter-argument that Sanders is paying himself is a lie, TOO. MADem Mar 2016 #266

Stop posting Republican lies. (Thank you Skinner for Debunking this,) Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #104

Last time she ended up owing a lot of money to vendors. Don't want that to happen again. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #106

this rw post still up getting recs after being proven false bigtree Mar 2016 #111

Don't post the "Rec's" you'll get a hide. Agschmid Mar 2016 #123

wow bigtree Mar 2016 #135

I started to rec it SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #136

As bad as the first post is Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #116

How has it been proven false? demwing Mar 2016 #253

Right here Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #261

horse shit lamp_shade Mar 2016 #120

Ohhhh...some Chump Change for the Flat Broke. SoapBox Mar 2016 #125

Completely debunked by Skinner himself. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #193

See Gwhittey Mar 2016 #130

Free Beacon ? Cryptoad Mar 2016 #131

Hey, OP! Please come back and self-delete this. MineralMan Mar 2016 #148

Lol still feelin' the Bern ? azurnoir Mar 2016 #173

Sorry...what does that have to do with my reply? MineralMan Mar 2016 #178

sorry I don't understand azurnoir Mar 2016 #188

Here, let Skinner help you: SunSeeker Mar 2016 #191

not much I've been on FEC's website searching for info that fits this situation nothing so far azurnoir Mar 2016 #196

Self-deleted. Will reply to you above. (nt) Skinner Mar 2016 #244

#byebyebernie Loki Mar 2016 #218

Right wing lies, right here on DU. Edit your OP with post #58. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #150

It is all about the money Scalded Nun Mar 2016 #158

This is all about failure to read. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #163

Why let mere FACTS get in the way of a good faux outrage? NurseJackie Mar 2016 #275

Her time is valuable, dear. When she left the White House she was so broke she had to silvershadow Mar 2016 #171

She didn't pay herself. Read Skinner explanation. hack89 Mar 2016 #175

OH. If so, my apologies. Off to read. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #179

the legal bills made them bankrupt treestar Mar 2016 #336

I can't believe the responses of some people after this has been completely debunked taught_me_patience Mar 2016 #180

"No other candidate running for president recorded payments to themselves" - whew... EndElectoral Mar 2016 #183

Super-PACs are nothing more than legalized money-laundering as well n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #185

Bookmarking. The people rec'ing this OP have truly revealed themselves. nt SunSeeker Mar 2016 #186

Did any of those recs surprise you? zappaman Mar 2016 #307

This thread has become a disgrace Godhumor Mar 2016 #189

That's for bleeding sure! KitSileya Mar 2016 #326

Did donors know $$$ was going in HRC's pocket? left-of-center2012 Mar 2016 #192

Never happened. Has been repeatedly shown to be false n/t Godhumor Mar 2016 #202

A blatant attempt to ratfuck is about to clear the one hundred rec mark. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #199

that is exactly what this is. smells like manny propaganda threads of days past. bettyellen Mar 2016 #260

This story has been proven to be horseshit ... salinsky Mar 2016 #200

Hit and run lies from a right-wing source... SidDithers Mar 2016 #201

Waffles! Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #221

Does Bernie have controversial $$$? Orange Butterfly Mar 2016 #203

Yes. He's gotten letters from the FEC over his donations. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #213

TY, I read the article... Orange Butterfly Mar 2016 #224

Free Beacon is a right wing propaganda site. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #236

bull crap MariaThinks Mar 2016 #206

This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #207

Here, let Skinner help you: SunSeeker Mar 2016 #209

This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #211

Who did you send your PRA request to? nt SunSeeker Mar 2016 #214

This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #215

Then why did you mention it? SunSeeker Mar 2016 #237

This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #238

I know that. The California Public Records Act only applies to California agencies. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #240

It was a passing comment nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #241

Wow. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #243

Don't worry about it. zappaman Mar 2016 #310

LOL SunSeeker Mar 2016 #312

You can look up every single transaction online and see every single one is in-kind Godhumor Mar 2016 #227

I know that, but I am waiting for a phone call nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #230

LOL! n/t JTFrog Mar 2016 #251

LMAO! zappaman Mar 2016 #311

Skinner's analysis is correct Gothmog Mar 2016 #262

A prime example of 100+ LOW INFO VOTERS who will believe anything so long as it Persondem Mar 2016 #228

This message was self-deleted by its author Hiraeth Mar 2016 #231

This message was self-deleted by its author sufrommich Mar 2016 #232

I RED THE THRED THAT IS WHY I DELEATED !! QUICK DRAW MCRAW Hiraeth Mar 2016 #233

Snort. OK, your reply was hilarious Godhumor Mar 2016 #234

good deal Hiraeth Mar 2016 #249

NO SHE DID NOT Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #235

There are multiple threads going about this thread Capt. Obvious Mar 2016 #242

Getting your anti-Hillary... MrWendel Mar 2016 #245

Opps, was going to reply because I thought I was at DU. but zappaman Mar 2016 #246

It looks like this was debunked, but it reminds me of the Bernie photos. Hillary fans just MelissaB Mar 2016 #248

It's a bargain AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #252

Nothing like a hit and run right wing propaganda thread to confirm who the haters are. JTFrog Mar 2016 #254

Yes it is. Agschmid Mar 2016 #282

The right hates Hillary. The fringe left hates Hillary... SidDithers Mar 2016 #288

I am the treasurer for a Texas GPAC and two candidates Gothmog Mar 2016 #263

A more accurate headline is: Clinton donates $250k of her time to her campaign. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #287

Actually, that is almost certainly false. Skinner Mar 2016 #290

wouldn't that then be declered as a loan? demwing Mar 2016 #294

Based on the reporting, it was not a loan. Skinner Mar 2016 #295

An in-kind contribution is by definition noncash. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #298

She paid for staff salaries directly out of her own pocket. Skinner Mar 2016 #299

Sounds sleazy Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #292

per Skinner memo........ 58. This is a quirk of FEC reporting. Hillary Clinton was not actually pai riversedge Mar 2016 #302

Sorry, I don't believe anything from that site, and you shouldn't either. nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #296

Meanwhile, President Rubio gives the go ahead to House bill HR277B, titled randys1 Mar 2016 #303

This is perfectly legal, I believe, but kind of stupid democrattotheend Mar 2016 #309

Not stupid. See Skinner's explanation at post 58 onenote Mar 2016 #313

Got it. Should have read that first. democrattotheend Mar 2016 #317

Kicked and recommended. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #324

No Shame jpb33 Mar 2016 #327

You mean, no shame in posting a completely debunked OP? msanthrope Mar 2016 #328

Bookmarked. Maybe this is end times? JohnnyLib2 Mar 2016 #333

Why is this abomination of a thread even still up? Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #337