Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
227. You can look up every single transaction online and see every single one is in-kind
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:53 PM
Mar 2016

Download the csv file from the FEC for her committee expenditures and filter for Hillary and Payroll. Copy the provided URL for a line item and paste in your browser. Voila, every transaction has a "*in-kind received" designation.

Wow. I can't believe she'd do that. PatrickforO Mar 2016 #1
HOW DARE SHE! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #37
she has no clue how bad this looks and neither do you roguevalley Mar 2016 #64
Also, THE FREE BEACON IS RIGHT-WING CRAP. SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #143
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #174
"Although it is legal" shenmue Mar 2016 #177
there's something about crossing into 6 figures that sorta raises alarms PatrynXX Mar 2016 #98
This is a Right Wing site !! SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #124
IF the OP is the same site, doesn't that make it fair game? Amimnoch Mar 2016 #140
Yeah, I figured someone would try to use this excuse. But look at your article, genius. upperatmos Mar 2016 #154
more wage theft scscholar Mar 2016 #170
you're both assuming it was 2 full years, magical thyme Mar 2016 #250
I think that's pretty standard actually. Bubzer Mar 2016 #67
I can't believe she'd do that. AlbertCat Mar 2016 #100
Debunked in post 58. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #329
...but, according to Hillary, $15/hr Minimum Wage it too much for the peasants. bvar22 Mar 2016 #279
No matter what else happens, "Hillary gonna get PAID!" razorman Mar 2016 #301
once again, as if more proof were needed... Merryland Mar 2016 #2
HOW DARE SHE! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #39
And that's a valid point of criticism NWCorona Mar 2016 #47
His wife also worked for years for no pay. Can you name a year on record that polly7 Mar 2016 #51
What's the salary for a First Lady? HillareeeHillaraah Mar 2016 #145
I didn't realize First Lady was a salaried position??? polly7 Mar 2016 #166
She didn't, we don't. HillareeeHillaraah Mar 2016 #172
And??? Why would she be paid, again? polly7 Mar 2016 #181
I'm lost as to your point here... HillareeeHillaraah Mar 2016 #190
My point is that Jane Sanders worked for free in an actual position that would have given polly7 Mar 2016 #195
You don't believe that First Lady of the United States of America in the 21st Century HillareeeHillaraah Mar 2016 #226
You have no idea what I 'believe' even though I just tried to spell out to you polly7 Mar 2016 #273
I believe that Jane was prohibited from drawing a salary owing to nepotism rules. MADem Mar 2016 #334
It is not illegal for a reason ... earthside Mar 2016 #115
Please, send me money so I can pay myself for running for President. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #182
K&R Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #3
Hahahahaha! You people who sent her money, now you know where it went. So sad! nt thereismore Mar 2016 #4
O U C H !! That's gonna leave a mark tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #77
Actually most of it goes to polling firms as she tries to buy a clue. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2016 #95
read either of JaneyVee's posts above SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #128
I can't do that. That poster is on ignore. nt thereismore Mar 2016 #142
OK, here it is: SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #147
Yes. He paid his campaign workers, she paid herself. Still laughing. thereismore Mar 2016 #161
You must not have read the article SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #239
? Matariki Mar 2016 #222
250,000 "I'm not kidding, Maddis" jfern Mar 2016 #318
Eh - if she needs more money she'll just contact Goldman Sachs. jillan Mar 2016 #5
Yes - yes... Plucketeer Mar 2016 #216
Guess which Clinton made $600,000 a year right out of college? marew Mar 2016 #332
Is that legal? Matariki Mar 2016 #6
my same question amborin Mar 2016 #14
didn't Rubio do that too? amborin Mar 2016 #15
From the article... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #17
She gave up her job as a paid speaker at Goldman. Downwinder Mar 2016 #21
I wonder what she was saying to them... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #23
You'd think Bill would get up off his ass and get a job BuelahWitch Mar 2016 #204
OP was completely debunked by Skinner himself. You should read the thread. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #272
Too much scrolling. Sorry, not sorry. n/t BuelahWitch Mar 2016 #286
Legal is not a word in the Clinton Dictionary. n/t PonyUp Mar 2016 #43
Remember Sarah Palin bought a whole new wardrobe with jwirr Mar 2016 #151
I believe so democrattotheend Mar 2016 #314
Maybe you can link breitbart or the Blaze while you're at it Godhumor Mar 2016 #7
Refute the information or not JackInGreen Mar 2016 #10
How about the FEC? Wilms Mar 2016 #11
That's a tough messenger to shoot!! Well played. :) nt Jarqui Mar 2016 #18
The poster was a sitting duck. Wilms Mar 2016 #22
Well played indeed! NWCorona Mar 2016 #49
Too bad they missed. Terribly Godhumor Mar 2016 #219
Sure, right to the source. Godhumor Mar 2016 #63
Yes it's true CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #45
Data in the article comes from the Federal Election Commission Herman4747 Mar 2016 #46
Remember, she was in poverty when she left the white house! Give her a break! Nt Logical Mar 2016 #8
Destitute, I tell ya. PonyUp Mar 2016 #48
Kee-Ryst! yallerdawg Mar 2016 #85
Uncertain future? LMAO. What will the Clinton family do being out of work with millions of dollars? PonyUp Mar 2016 #126
I will never say the Clinton's were broke. That would be a slap to all the hard working Americans NWCorona Mar 2016 #60
ruined by bill. no sympathy there roguevalley Mar 2016 #65
That really isn't the point I'm making. NWCorona Mar 2016 #69
So poor that she left the white house with a few white house items to pawn. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #108
I know - I felt so sorry for her. 840high Mar 2016 #269
It seems running for Prez pays better than Goldman/Sachs speeches. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #9
SNAP! Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #110
What is it with the Clinton's and pushing loopholes to the limit? NWCorona Mar 2016 #12
greed & arrogance. Merryland Mar 2016 #27
Exactly! They are in it for themselves NWCorona Mar 2016 #35
It never ends... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #13
And Palin couldn't accept a new wardrobe? TexasMommaWithAHat Mar 2016 #16
Aaaand look at all the "poisoning the well" tomfoolery that's followed your OP! Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #19
My Lady Friend Gets Two Or Three Solicitation E-Mails A Day From The Clinton Campaign For $'s.... global1 Mar 2016 #20
I think they ask for $1 to claim more individual donations Merryland Mar 2016 #30
A bunch of $1 contributions will drag down their average contribution BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #72
She's giving her contributors a big discount BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #73
Bingo. jwirr Mar 2016 #169
Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT. fleur-de-lisa Mar 2016 #24
Someone doesn't want the truth out NWCorona Mar 2016 #41
Embarrassing and enlightening at the same time tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #75
Disturbing elljay Mar 2016 #99
One of my pet peeves too... Ino Mar 2016 #117
Jury voted to leave it. fleur-de-lisa Mar 2016 #139
I know elljay Mar 2016 #153
This would never happen in Russia. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #113
What the actual fuck. Somebody has a hurt. Sorry, alerter, that you gave her money. nt thereismore Mar 2016 #122
I was juror #1. MineralMan Mar 2016 #138
She must have given herself a speech. (n/t) thesquanderer Mar 2016 #25
thanks - first laugh of the day. Merryland Mar 2016 #31
+2! NWCorona Mar 2016 #42
LOL. Good one. n/t PonyUp Mar 2016 #50
DUzy Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #114
Oh, wow! More irrelevant s _ _T looking for a wall. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #26
That's peanuts, it's only pay for one-hour's work... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #28
Disgusting. She's in this for HERSELF. closeupready Mar 2016 #29
A girl has to have some spending money. Downwinder Mar 2016 #33
HOW DARE SHE! JaneyVee Mar 2016 #40
You are repeating yourself. Downwinder Mar 2016 #74
Nothing wrong with that... Agschmid Mar 2016 #121
It is when it is a false equivalency and TM99 Mar 2016 #137
Man that last line is a bit over the top... Agschmid Mar 2016 #141
Well aware. TM99 Mar 2016 #267
You are not educated on that which you are speaking. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #194
Isn't Freebeacon a frepper site? kydo Mar 2016 #32
Joe Schoffstall, a rightwing asshole, with an article in a right wing paper. still_one Mar 2016 #34
are you suggesting they made up the FEC filings? Or it doesn't matter because the MSM didn't report magical thyme Mar 2016 #52
biased news sources are only allowed noamnety Mar 2016 #57
Oh look, Clinton bashing from the Washington Free Beacon... SidDithers Mar 2016 #36
Hillary must be doing better than we realized! :-D NurseJackie Mar 2016 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author Herman4747 Mar 2016 #59
And yet the poster chose to link to the Washington Free Beacon... SidDithers Mar 2016 #88
You can't expect the FEC to do it ... but you can do it yourself. GeorgeGist Mar 2016 #89
How can you even post that after reading Skinner's post #58?... SidDithers Mar 2016 #90
Because it doesn't matter to the poster that it's a lie. okasha Mar 2016 #270
No wonder she was bullying Maddi for that dollar! noamnety Mar 2016 #38
Found the link I'm not kidding Maddie Autumn Mar 2016 #56
Maddie now we know why she needed that dollar Autumn Mar 2016 #44
I'm not kidding Maddie!! CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #53
LOL polly7 Mar 2016 #54
This is a quirk of FEC reporting. Skinner Mar 2016 #58
Alright, Your FINE EXPLANATION is most satisfactory... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #68
And yet you allow it to persist. sufrommich Mar 2016 #70
NOT EVERYONE HAS TRAINING IN ACCOUNTING... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #76
Maybe your first clue should have been the source used.nt sufrommich Mar 2016 #78
I personally wasn't willing to accept the right-wing rag... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #80
It happens fast and the right wing has been doing it for years. Agschmid Mar 2016 #107
Yup. Agschmid Mar 2016 #105
Just remember the Rude Pundit's wise words. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #79
Look, I did go the FEC website! Herman4747 Mar 2016 #82
EVERYONE, I RECOMMEND THAT YOU SEE SKINNER'S FINE POST, #58! n/t Herman4747 Mar 2016 #84
Replied to wrong post. MineralMan Mar 2016 #133
Yes, and might raise an eyebrow at obviously phony claims. Hortensis Mar 2016 #225
You should alert on him. n/t Wilms Mar 2016 #83
+1!!! obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #255
Thanks for this. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #87
I am the treasurer for a Texas GPAC and two candidates Gothmog Mar 2016 #91
Oh you mean "accounting". Agschmid Mar 2016 #101
Thanks for the insight on this. Is this a common issues NWCorona Mar 2016 #118
Thanks, Skinner. MineralMan Mar 2016 #127
Is there anyway to determine what the "in kind" contribution was? noamnety Mar 2016 #144
What on earth is there to change your mind about? Skinner Mar 2016 #149
Thank you for this reply! hamsterjill Mar 2016 #164
I was trying to understand noamnety Mar 2016 #165
To answer your question... Kensan Mar 2016 #264
"The OP is false. Period." - Why? Because you say so? Bubzer Mar 2016 #208
I'm wondering also what a quarter of a million 'in kind' looks like tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #212
My point is that the OP is false no matter what the in-kind contribution was. Skinner Mar 2016 #258
My issue was this: You could have easily posted a link at a request instead of stone-walling. Bubzer Mar 2016 #281
But people who don't understand the intricacies of the FEC onenote Mar 2016 #315
The inoculant to disinformation is fact. No one benefits by refusing to share facts. Bubzer Mar 2016 #316
True. But engaging in some due diligence before buying into something from a rw site onenote Mar 2016 #319
I do agree. Bubzer Mar 2016 #320
I think the better thing would have been for the OP, after acknowledging the article was misleading, onenote Mar 2016 #321
Can't argue with that. It takes strength to admit being wrong... so there's cetainly no harm in it. Bubzer Mar 2016 #323
Why don't you try READING the post--it explains it all, quite simply, too. MADem Mar 2016 #268
Welcome to our world Skinner. Loki Mar 2016 #217
HAHAHA BEAT ME TO IT obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #256
your link was interesting tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #210
Thanks. I didn't even get into the guts of the report to see that, since this essentially.... George II Mar 2016 #155
Thank you, Skinner! SunSeeker Mar 2016 #168
To be fair, I didn't hear about tit on Free Beacon (whatever that is). I heard of it on DU. silvershadow Mar 2016 #184
I think the "butthurt" (your word) is justified. Skinner Mar 2016 #223
"It is a massive fail" obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #276
Do Hosts have the authority to lock a disruptive thread linking to a right-wing source?... SidDithers Mar 2016 #289
Uh, yeah. NanceGreggs Mar 2016 #291
+1 MaggieD Mar 2016 #308
Indeed. It's like there's nothing that can be done KitSileya Mar 2016 #325
Sad, indeed NastyRiffraff Mar 2016 #330
Skinner, also sad are the recommendations that a troll with only 24 posts.... George II Mar 2016 #297
I find that far worse than the hourly use of RW sources here. zappaman Mar 2016 #306
Except people aren't "moving on" onenote Mar 2016 #229
Why don't you, as a Sanders supporter, urge the OP to delete this pile of steaming Free Beacon crap? MADem Mar 2016 #274
I am not anyone's keeper, but I will try anyway. Perhaps it is a troll? I have no idea. silvershadow Mar 2016 #280
I'm not issuing an order, just offering a suggestion. You're your own boss, of course. MADem Mar 2016 #283
Oh, so now this too is the fault of "Hillary supporters?" yardwork Mar 2016 #331
Thanks Skinner. I was looking through the FCC and didn't understand that. Autumn Mar 2016 #198
I've trying tom find info about this type of contribution FEC wasn't helpful but IRS was azurnoir Mar 2016 #220
Go to the FEC website and download her entire 7/15/215 REPORT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Skinner Mar 2016 #247
thanks but I was more looking for a definition of in kind contribution IRS was helpful with that azurnoir Mar 2016 #293
Can you give us an idea of what she gave her campaign on April 13th that was worth $74,000? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #284
Thanks. for information. Lets take the OP down. riversedge Mar 2016 #300
Gee, are we donating enough? NowSam Mar 2016 #61
Free bacon! Dem2 Mar 2016 #62
yes there are mercuryblues Mar 2016 #96
Wingnut lies that would get downvoted to oblivion on reddit - a site that allows Republicans Dem2 Mar 2016 #285
the problem is mercuryblues Mar 2016 #305
If I were donating to her I'd be a bit upset kracer20 Mar 2016 #66
Why aren't you upset about right wing propaganda being posted on DU? SunSeeker Mar 2016 #160
Give her a break RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #71
Since you are making fun of how other people look DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #119
He's not running for president; she is. closeupready Mar 2016 #132
Your pal DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #146
She's running for president. Deal with it. closeupready Mar 2016 #176
You and your pal have every right to call... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #187
Is that her campaign strategy, Hillary Clinton, victim-in-chief? closeupready Mar 2016 #197
If I said women of a certain age look like shriveled up raisins I would want to change the subject DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #205
Thanks for this obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #259
Let's try an experiment. treestar Mar 2016 #335
My hair and makeup don't cost that much RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #152
There are no ugly people, just misinformed observers. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #157
Oh believe me when I tell you RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #159
I am sure there are people in your life who find you attractive. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #162
Nope not a one. RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #167
Making fun of how an over-60 female politican looks obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #257
Yes, this is what DU has become. Awful. :( Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #277
yup obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #278
Sadly, there are some immature jerks here masquerading as progressives onenote Mar 2016 #304
yet we don't dare call any Bernie supporter sexist at any time dsc Mar 2016 #265
Meanwhile RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #271
Why? Does she figure there's a per hour rate for running for president? Vinca Mar 2016 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Mar 2016 #322
"Also, THE FREE BEACON IS RIGHT-WING CRAP." fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #86
I'm assuming you will be self-deleting now, right? N/t Godhumor Mar 2016 #92
The founder of the Free Beacon is Michael Goldfarb. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #93
Are the Clintons broke again? Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #94
Thanks to Skinner for debunking a right wing meme that shouldn't have been posted here onenote Mar 2016 #97
Yup. Agschmid Mar 2016 #109
Pocket change. CentralMass Mar 2016 #102
Anyone know how much Sanders is paying himself and family members? George II Mar 2016 #103
He isn't paying himself anything--he gets a salary from his Senate gig. MADem Mar 2016 #112
Thanks. My question was borderline rhetorical. What the OP "uncovered" is not uncommon at all.... George II Mar 2016 #129
Except Hillary isn't paying herself from her campaign. Skinner Mar 2016 #134
Thanks. I responded up there, too. George II Mar 2016 #156
Of course she isn't. But the counter-argument that Sanders is paying himself is a lie, TOO. MADem Mar 2016 #266
Stop posting Republican lies. (Thank you Skinner for Debunking this,) Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #104
Last time she ended up owing a lot of money to vendors. Don't want that to happen again. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #106
this rw post still up getting recs after being proven false bigtree Mar 2016 #111
Don't post the "Rec's" you'll get a hide. Agschmid Mar 2016 #123
wow bigtree Mar 2016 #135
I started to rec it SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #136
As bad as the first post is Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #116
How has it been proven false? demwing Mar 2016 #253
Right here Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #261
horse shit lamp_shade Mar 2016 #120
Ohhhh...some Chump Change for the Flat Broke. SoapBox Mar 2016 #125
Completely debunked by Skinner himself. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #193
See Gwhittey Mar 2016 #130
Free Beacon ? Cryptoad Mar 2016 #131
Hey, OP! Please come back and self-delete this. MineralMan Mar 2016 #148
Lol still feelin' the Bern ? azurnoir Mar 2016 #173
Sorry...what does that have to do with my reply? MineralMan Mar 2016 #178
sorry I don't understand azurnoir Mar 2016 #188
Here, let Skinner help you: SunSeeker Mar 2016 #191
not much I've been on FEC's website searching for info that fits this situation nothing so far azurnoir Mar 2016 #196
Self-deleted. Will reply to you above. (nt) Skinner Mar 2016 #244
#byebyebernie Loki Mar 2016 #218
Right wing lies, right here on DU. Edit your OP with post #58. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #150
It is all about the money Scalded Nun Mar 2016 #158
This is all about failure to read. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #163
Why let mere FACTS get in the way of a good faux outrage? NurseJackie Mar 2016 #275
Her time is valuable, dear. When she left the White House she was so broke she had to silvershadow Mar 2016 #171
She didn't pay herself. Read Skinner explanation. hack89 Mar 2016 #175
OH. If so, my apologies. Off to read. nt silvershadow Mar 2016 #179
the legal bills made them bankrupt treestar Mar 2016 #336
I can't believe the responses of some people after this has been completely debunked taught_me_patience Mar 2016 #180
"No other candidate running for president recorded payments to themselves" - whew... EndElectoral Mar 2016 #183
Super-PACs are nothing more than legalized money-laundering as well n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #185
Bookmarking. The people rec'ing this OP have truly revealed themselves. nt SunSeeker Mar 2016 #186
Did any of those recs surprise you? zappaman Mar 2016 #307
This thread has become a disgrace Godhumor Mar 2016 #189
That's for bleeding sure! KitSileya Mar 2016 #326
Did donors know $$$ was going in HRC's pocket? left-of-center2012 Mar 2016 #192
Never happened. Has been repeatedly shown to be false n/t Godhumor Mar 2016 #202
A blatant attempt to ratfuck is about to clear the one hundred rec mark. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #199
that is exactly what this is. smells like manny propaganda threads of days past. bettyellen Mar 2016 #260
This story has been proven to be horseshit ... salinsky Mar 2016 #200
Hit and run lies from a right-wing source... SidDithers Mar 2016 #201
Waffles! Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #221
Does Bernie have controversial $$$? Orange Butterfly Mar 2016 #203
Yes. He's gotten letters from the FEC over his donations. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #213
TY, I read the article... Orange Butterfly Mar 2016 #224
Free Beacon is a right wing propaganda site. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #236
bull crap MariaThinks Mar 2016 #206
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #207
Here, let Skinner help you: SunSeeker Mar 2016 #209
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #211
Who did you send your PRA request to? nt SunSeeker Mar 2016 #214
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #215
Then why did you mention it? SunSeeker Mar 2016 #237
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #238
I know that. The California Public Records Act only applies to California agencies. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #240
It was a passing comment nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #241
Wow. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #243
Don't worry about it. zappaman Mar 2016 #310
LOL SunSeeker Mar 2016 #312
You can look up every single transaction online and see every single one is in-kind Godhumor Mar 2016 #227
I know that, but I am waiting for a phone call nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #230
LOL! n/t JTFrog Mar 2016 #251
LMAO! zappaman Mar 2016 #311
Skinner's analysis is correct Gothmog Mar 2016 #262
A prime example of 100+ LOW INFO VOTERS who will believe anything so long as it Persondem Mar 2016 #228
This message was self-deleted by its author Hiraeth Mar 2016 #231
This message was self-deleted by its author sufrommich Mar 2016 #232
I RED THE THRED THAT IS WHY I DELEATED !! QUICK DRAW MCRAW Hiraeth Mar 2016 #233
Snort. OK, your reply was hilarious Godhumor Mar 2016 #234
good deal Hiraeth Mar 2016 #249
NO SHE DID NOT Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #235
There are multiple threads going about this thread Capt. Obvious Mar 2016 #242
Getting your anti-Hillary... MrWendel Mar 2016 #245
Opps, was going to reply because I thought I was at DU. but zappaman Mar 2016 #246
It looks like this was debunked, but it reminds me of the Bernie photos. Hillary fans just MelissaB Mar 2016 #248
It's a bargain AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #252
Nothing like a hit and run right wing propaganda thread to confirm who the haters are. JTFrog Mar 2016 #254
Yes it is. Agschmid Mar 2016 #282
The right hates Hillary. The fringe left hates Hillary... SidDithers Mar 2016 #288
I am the treasurer for a Texas GPAC and two candidates Gothmog Mar 2016 #263
A more accurate headline is: Clinton donates $250k of her time to her campaign. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #287
Actually, that is almost certainly false. Skinner Mar 2016 #290
wouldn't that then be declered as a loan? demwing Mar 2016 #294
Based on the reporting, it was not a loan. Skinner Mar 2016 #295
An in-kind contribution is by definition noncash. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #298
She paid for staff salaries directly out of her own pocket. Skinner Mar 2016 #299
Sounds sleazy Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #292
per Skinner memo........ 58. This is a quirk of FEC reporting. Hillary Clinton was not actually pai riversedge Mar 2016 #302
Sorry, I don't believe anything from that site, and you shouldn't either. nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #296
Meanwhile, President Rubio gives the go ahead to House bill HR277B, titled randys1 Mar 2016 #303
This is perfectly legal, I believe, but kind of stupid democrattotheend Mar 2016 #309
Not stupid. See Skinner's explanation at post 58 onenote Mar 2016 #313
Got it. Should have read that first. democrattotheend Mar 2016 #317
Kicked and recommended. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #324
No Shame jpb33 Mar 2016 #327
You mean, no shame in posting a completely debunked OP? msanthrope Mar 2016 #328
Bookmarked. Maybe this is end times? JohnnyLib2 Mar 2016 #333
Why is this abomination of a thread even still up? Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #337
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Paid Herself $250...»Reply #227