Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Paid Herself $250,000 From Campaign Funds [View all]Agschmid
(28,749 posts)101. Oh you mean "accounting".
We have sunk so low, what a bullshit story from a bullshit source and yet here it is.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
337 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, I figured someone would try to use this excuse. But look at your article, genius.
upperatmos
Mar 2016
#154
...but, according to Hillary, $15/hr Minimum Wage it too much for the peasants.
bvar22
Mar 2016
#279
My point is that Jane Sanders worked for free in an actual position that would have given
polly7
Mar 2016
#195
You don't believe that First Lady of the United States of America in the 21st Century
HillareeeHillaraah
Mar 2016
#226
I believe that Jane was prohibited from drawing a salary owing to nepotism rules.
MADem
Mar 2016
#334
Hahahahaha! You people who sent her money, now you know where it went. So sad! nt
thereismore
Mar 2016
#4
OP was completely debunked by Skinner himself. You should read the thread. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2016
#272
Remember, she was in poverty when she left the white house! Give her a break! Nt
Logical
Mar 2016
#8
Uncertain future? LMAO. What will the Clinton family do being out of work with millions of dollars?
PonyUp
Mar 2016
#126
I will never say the Clinton's were broke. That would be a slap to all the hard working Americans
NWCorona
Mar 2016
#60
So poor that she left the white house with a few white house items to pawn.
Ivan Kaputski
Mar 2016
#108
Aaaand look at all the "poisoning the well" tomfoolery that's followed your OP!
Lizzie Poppet
Mar 2016
#19
My Lady Friend Gets Two Or Three Solicitation E-Mails A Day From The Clinton Campaign For $'s....
global1
Mar 2016
#20
A bunch of $1 contributions will drag down their average contribution
BernieforPres2016
Mar 2016
#72
What the actual fuck. Somebody has a hurt. Sorry, alerter, that you gave her money. nt
thereismore
Mar 2016
#122
are you suggesting they made up the FEC filings? Or it doesn't matter because the MSM didn't report
magical thyme
Mar 2016
#52
My issue was this: You could have easily posted a link at a request instead of stone-walling.
Bubzer
Mar 2016
#281
The inoculant to disinformation is fact. No one benefits by refusing to share facts.
Bubzer
Mar 2016
#316
True. But engaging in some due diligence before buying into something from a rw site
onenote
Mar 2016
#319
I think the better thing would have been for the OP, after acknowledging the article was misleading,
onenote
Mar 2016
#321
Can't argue with that. It takes strength to admit being wrong... so there's cetainly no harm in it.
Bubzer
Mar 2016
#323
Thanks. I didn't even get into the guts of the report to see that, since this essentially....
George II
Mar 2016
#155
To be fair, I didn't hear about tit on Free Beacon (whatever that is). I heard of it on DU.
silvershadow
Mar 2016
#184
Do Hosts have the authority to lock a disruptive thread linking to a right-wing source?...
SidDithers
Mar 2016
#289
Skinner, also sad are the recommendations that a troll with only 24 posts....
George II
Mar 2016
#297
Why don't you, as a Sanders supporter, urge the OP to delete this pile of steaming Free Beacon crap?
MADem
Mar 2016
#274
I am not anyone's keeper, but I will try anyway. Perhaps it is a troll? I have no idea.
silvershadow
Mar 2016
#280
I'm not issuing an order, just offering a suggestion. You're your own boss, of course.
MADem
Mar 2016
#283
I've trying tom find info about this type of contribution FEC wasn't helpful but IRS was
azurnoir
Mar 2016
#220
Go to the FEC website and download her entire 7/15/215 REPORT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS
Skinner
Mar 2016
#247
thanks but I was more looking for a definition of in kind contribution IRS was helpful with that
azurnoir
Mar 2016
#293
Can you give us an idea of what she gave her campaign on April 13th that was worth $74,000?
lumberjack_jeff
Mar 2016
#284
Wingnut lies that would get downvoted to oblivion on reddit - a site that allows Republicans
Dem2
Mar 2016
#285
If I said women of a certain age look like shriveled up raisins I would want to change the subject
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#205
Thanks to Skinner for debunking a right wing meme that shouldn't have been posted here
onenote
Mar 2016
#97
Thanks. My question was borderline rhetorical. What the OP "uncovered" is not uncommon at all....
George II
Mar 2016
#129
Of course she isn't. But the counter-argument that Sanders is paying himself is a lie, TOO.
MADem
Mar 2016
#266
Last time she ended up owing a lot of money to vendors. Don't want that to happen again.
Ivan Kaputski
Mar 2016
#106
not much I've been on FEC's website searching for info that fits this situation nothing so far
azurnoir
Mar 2016
#196
Her time is valuable, dear. When she left the White House she was so broke she had to
silvershadow
Mar 2016
#171
I can't believe the responses of some people after this has been completely debunked
taught_me_patience
Mar 2016
#180
"No other candidate running for president recorded payments to themselves" - whew...
EndElectoral
Mar 2016
#183
that is exactly what this is. smells like manny propaganda threads of days past.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#260
I know that. The California Public Records Act only applies to California agencies.
SunSeeker
Mar 2016
#240
You can look up every single transaction online and see every single one is in-kind
Godhumor
Mar 2016
#227
A prime example of 100+ LOW INFO VOTERS who will believe anything so long as it
Persondem
Mar 2016
#228
It looks like this was debunked, but it reminds me of the Bernie photos. Hillary fans just
MelissaB
Mar 2016
#248
Nothing like a hit and run right wing propaganda thread to confirm who the haters are.
JTFrog
Mar 2016
#254
A more accurate headline is: Clinton donates $250k of her time to her campaign.
lumberjack_jeff
Mar 2016
#287
per Skinner memo........ 58. This is a quirk of FEC reporting. Hillary Clinton was not actually pai
riversedge
Mar 2016
#302
Sorry, I don't believe anything from that site, and you shouldn't either. nt
BreakfastClub
Mar 2016
#296