Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(8,541 posts)

12. Why don't you address the content of the article

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 04:42 PM

Mar 2016

Instead of bashing the source? Did you even read it? It's a very well laid out argument.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

scary. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #1

Very! NWCorona Mar 2016 #3

Agreed! NWCorona Mar 2016 #4

And ties to Mitt Romney NWCorona Mar 2016 #6

"...if true". in other words, conspiracy theory nt msongs Mar 2016 #7

It is conspiracy theory. I heard thru the grape vine that... JaneyVee Mar 2016 #8

Why don't you address the content of the article NWCorona Mar 2016 #12

Well Hillary hasn't won the nomination NWCorona Mar 2016 #13

The Intercept is doing some fine investigative reporting. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #9

Yes they are! NWCorona Mar 2016 #14

Hillary's "progressive" mask is cracking wide open here. 99th_Monkey Mar 2016 #10

M$M gave us Bush, Iraq War, Tea Party, Trump & Hillary. Kittycat Mar 2016 #17

Jesus. AzDar Mar 2016 #11

None of this matters to Clinton supporters. The Dem establishment are Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #15

I haven't seen one yet address this other than to attack the source. NWCorona Mar 2016 #16

K&R for TPP Octafish Mar 2016 #18

and means test & privatize Soc Sec: amborin Mar 2016 #19