Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
But that's different! Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #1
Only his IDEAS matter bravenak Feb 2016 #2
No. The difference is the Clinton camp is lying. RiverLover Feb 2016 #16
Nothing in this op is untrue bravenak Feb 2016 #21
NY Times begs to differ. AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #3
The roll call votes are included in the op bravenak Feb 2016 #4
They are different votes two years apart. panader0 Feb 2016 #10
What are you talking about? bravenak Feb 2016 #11
Indeed Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #12
I see now. She posted about 07 when the op is about 09 bravenak Feb 2016 #14
Senate Roll Call Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #5
Just further proof that his whole platform is just to rile up angry people. R B Garr Feb 2016 #6
Yep. I find this DISHONEST bravenak Feb 2016 #7
He had good reasons for his vote and he explained them: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #8
Still hypocritical bravenak Feb 2016 #9
Only according to you, his reasons make sense. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #13
You posted about 2007 bravenak Feb 2016 #20
Well, I guess there's always a reason to dismiss a Bernie explanation as valid. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #27
And Hillary's as well bravenak Feb 2016 #28
Well if on the balance of all things she has done she had a net positive voting record JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #29
I know bravenak Feb 2016 #30
You know, I sat back because I knew this was just another bullshit OP. nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #15
I knew someone would try to say he was a hypocrite so I was ready. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #17
He is bravenak Feb 2016 #22
For wanting to wait, no he was prudent. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #23
He voted no bravenak Feb 2016 #24
With good reason, or don't you do nuance? Which part do you disagree with?: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #25
Him criticising her without nuance is why i disagree with you bravenak Feb 2016 #26
Hs campaign has signalled he will get tougher pandr32 Feb 2016 #18
Yep bravenak Feb 2016 #19
Kick Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders hits Clinton on g...»Reply #26