Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
What happened to Bernie's political revolution? Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #1
GOP trolls on the DU and elsewhere are mucking up Democratic enthusiasm. applegrove Feb 2016 #3
Read again the post you replied to. Red Knight Feb 2016 #7
Yeah that will help. Red Knight Feb 2016 #5
He's being held back by Clinton's presence on the ticket causing voter suppression. (nt) w4rma Feb 2016 #8
Bernie's holding up his end. frylock Feb 2016 #17
Pie in the sky... workinclasszero Feb 2016 #22
It has become apparent that the DNC end game is nominating Hillary. Nothing beyond that. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2016 #24
Reminds me of that 1970 movie: "Suppose They Gave a War and Nobody Came?" George II Feb 2016 #38
GOP turnout noretreatnosurrender Feb 2016 #2
I'm sorry to quibble with you, Cali... Out of Time Man Feb 2016 #4
The dynamics of the 2008 campaign were completely different than those of this 2016 campaign..... George II Feb 2016 #40
Exactly, we had more viable candidates to choose from... Out of Time Man Feb 2016 #42
Most votes for a candidate in NH ever. bobbobbins01 Feb 2016 #6
Sorry, Bernie Sanders. There is zero evidence of your ‘political revolution’ yet Gothmog Feb 2016 #9
Sorry Hillary will lose the general. cali Feb 2016 #26
Bernie would do much worse than Hillary redstateblues Feb 2016 #28
If you really believe this, then open Irish brokerage account Gothmog Feb 2016 #31
bad news for the candidate basing his entire campaign on 'revolution.' wyldwolf Feb 2016 #10
This is what happens in a two-person race Blue_Adept Feb 2016 #11
When I saw Marco Rubio and Nikki Haley.. one_voice Feb 2016 #39
quite frankly there are two bad candidates in this race. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #12
Spoiled by Obama loyalsister Feb 2016 #20
I hear you. one has plans but no vision, the other has vision but no plan geek tragedy Feb 2016 #23
I would vote for Obama for a 3rd term gwheezie Feb 2016 #29
no doubt Obama would easily win 50+% against these two nt geek tragedy Feb 2016 #30
A bad sign for both Hillary and Bernie. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #13
Where are the new Berniebros? nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #14
The question is, where are the new Hillary supporters? NWCorona Feb 2016 #15
In their parent's basement, enjoying a bag of cheetos. Kang Colby Feb 2016 #18
Perhaps you forgot your sarcasm tag? Out of Time Man Feb 2016 #43
Not really. DCBob Feb 2016 #16
It also proves Sanders's talk of a political revolution is nonsense. Zynx Feb 2016 #19
Low Turnout And A Transient Population Make The Nevada Caucuses Unpredictable Donkees Feb 2016 #21
What happened to all the revolutionaries? zappaman Feb 2016 #25
Or they weren't registered, or they were too young to vote. George II Feb 2016 #33
Or they thought they were supposed to caucus online CorkySt.Clair Feb 2016 #36
Good one! George II Feb 2016 #37
I thought Bernie was supposed to drive turnout to historic levels redstateblues Feb 2016 #27
The low Nevada turnout, if it's attributable to candidates, is the fault of ALL candidates, not one. George II Feb 2016 #32
I guess the revolution got cancelled? leftofcool Feb 2016 #34
That indicates Bernie isn't generating the enthusiasm he promised BainsBane Feb 2016 #35
Turnout was higher for Democrats in 2008 Flying Squirrel Feb 2016 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A bad sign: Turnout WAY ...»Reply #5