HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » If the head to head polls... » Reply #5

Response to PatrickforO (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:02 AM

5. I hadn't thought of that one in a while.

The Clinton Foundation arms deals. I just said to a Hillary supporter that what I needed on the Goldman Sachs transcripts was transparency and honesty, that I might accept a truly honest explanation if the transcripts are bad, as they probably are (say, "You can't run for president and win without big money, in the current system. I needed the money. And you can't successfully regulate them if you don't know them and they don't know you. I know it looks bad. My goals are good." --something along those lines.) I'm not against a canny president. And FDR was rich! I said she has two problems that could rob us of having a Dem president next year, that and the emails. Both need transparency and honesty for me to consider voting for her in November, if Bernie doesn't get the nomination.

Anyway, I was going on and on about this, and forgot about the Clinton Foundation, and just put the OTHER donors aside for the moment.

Gawd. The Clinton Foundation.

I'm also furious with her about Honduras (2009-ish). But that probably wouldn't lose her votes here, cuz almost no one knows about it.

Thanks for reminding me that she has, at the least, THREE big show-stopping problems!

It's such an amazing thing, in the USA, to have a truly clean candidate of known and proven integrity!


He's canny in a different way. Not slick. But smart. Very smart.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Please login to view edit histories.