Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Hold on Rachel [View all]

mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
12. that is not what rachel is saying
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 12:03 AM
Feb 2016

she is saying the BS people in NH may vote Trump in the GE and more dems in the GE will vote HRC...that is what she is saying for NH....I like BS but I see it this way mathematically as well

Hold on Rachel [View all] angrychair Feb 2016 OP
Not Bernies fault that... Armymedic88 Feb 2016 #1
exactly....he did his part virtualobserver Feb 2016 #2
Yup..hee. nt artislife Feb 2016 #23
The drop in turnout was solely because Hillary failed to turn out the vote for herself. Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #3
True. Rachel will NOT say that though, she's not allowed. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #4
She sold her soul. Done watching as of two days ago. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #6
Hillary interview? Yes, me too. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #7
Yes, the second one in four days. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #9
+1 berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #26
same here 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #41
Rachel turned the corner awhile back I could see it coming when glinda Feb 2016 #5
Same here MissDeeds Feb 2016 #16
Oddly, what turned me off to Rachel Joe Shlabotnik Feb 2016 #20
Rachel is so in the tank for Hillary INdemo Feb 2016 #8
She didn't win because she is a terrible candidate. TPTB nominate her at all of our risk eon mikehiggins Feb 2016 #11
And David slew Goliath with a sling and a stone... John Poet Feb 2016 #15
I'm sure it was orders from the MSNBC, chiefs or MAYBE the NBC chiefs. napi21 Feb 2016 #17
And that's the power of money. Gregorian Feb 2016 #10
that is not what rachel is saying mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #12
What??? angrychair Feb 2016 #13
you are not from NH are you? ;) mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #14
um. amborin Feb 2016 #21
Please Explain In Detail How You Came To That Conclusion.....nt global1 Feb 2016 #18
that you are not from nh? mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #19
That you are a Clinton supporter? Zorra Feb 2016 #24
Women are bad at math. Kurovski Feb 2016 #22
She likes the millions she's paid and needs to rationalize toeing the corp line. Skwmom Feb 2016 #25
She's a Comcaster. nt valerief Feb 2016 #27
+10 nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #30
And Rachel Is Almost As Good As They Get Corporate Wise scottie55 Feb 2016 #28
Rachel on AAR was fucking awesome! Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #29
I hope you send that to her. It's an important point. Armstead Feb 2016 #31
I was puzzling over that Rachael segment myself 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #32
She's not lying. world wide wally Feb 2016 #33
A Lot Of It Is The Anti Obama Vote scottie55 Feb 2016 #35
I get the math angrychair Feb 2016 #36
That's a good post, angrychair. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #39
More Republicans voted in New Hampshire than Democrats and I've posted this before but I will post Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #34
I don't disagree at all angrychair Feb 2016 #37
I agree, it wasn't a record breaking turnout but it was in the top tier as for overall numbers, Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #38
Bernie got more votes than any candidate ever! Bernblu Feb 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hold on Rachel»Reply #12