Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders Beats Clinton 49-49: The Real Story Behind the Iowa Numbers [View all]UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)95. Only time will tell
I think we can both agree Bernie has been shocking a lot of people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders Beats Clinton 49-49: The Real Story Behind the Iowa Numbers [View all]
UglyGreed
Feb 2016
OP
Not really.. the number of delegates in Iowa is small.. it all about PERCEPTION.
basselope
Feb 2016
#20
Maybe. Just maybe, that is the difference between the Clinton canpaign and the Sanders campaign.
pangaia
Feb 2016
#22
If that happens, it happens. But I doubt it. The other thing about her stronghold,
pnwmom
Feb 2016
#94
Only 2% of the delegates come from states as white and liberal as Iowa and New Hampshire
Gothmog
Feb 2016
#98
According to the Cook Report, Sanders needed to win 70% of the Iowa delegates to be competitive
Gothmog
Feb 2016
#19
Iowa showed Sanders' viability and Hillary's vulnerabilty. That's a big win for Sanders.
senz
Feb 2016
#55
That is an excellent analysis. I kept seeing from lots of sources that he needed to win Iowa to be
Number23
Feb 2016
#73
Great article. That seemed like a levelheaded, accurate assessment of this election.
Gregorian
Feb 2016
#42
Sanders started off with a huge SD deficit. He did NOTHING to help himself in IA.
Bleacher Creature
Feb 2016
#83