Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders Beats Clinton 49-49: The Real Story Behind the Iowa Numbers [View all]monicaangela
(1,508 posts)31. And,
the impromptu, rushed, unexpected declaration of victory by the Clinton campaign before dashing out of the room.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders Beats Clinton 49-49: The Real Story Behind the Iowa Numbers [View all]
UglyGreed
Feb 2016
OP
Not really.. the number of delegates in Iowa is small.. it all about PERCEPTION.
basselope
Feb 2016
#20
Maybe. Just maybe, that is the difference between the Clinton canpaign and the Sanders campaign.
pangaia
Feb 2016
#22
If that happens, it happens. But I doubt it. The other thing about her stronghold,
pnwmom
Feb 2016
#94
Only 2% of the delegates come from states as white and liberal as Iowa and New Hampshire
Gothmog
Feb 2016
#98
According to the Cook Report, Sanders needed to win 70% of the Iowa delegates to be competitive
Gothmog
Feb 2016
#19
Iowa showed Sanders' viability and Hillary's vulnerabilty. That's a big win for Sanders.
senz
Feb 2016
#55
That is an excellent analysis. I kept seeing from lots of sources that he needed to win Iowa to be
Number23
Feb 2016
#73
Great article. That seemed like a levelheaded, accurate assessment of this election.
Gregorian
Feb 2016
#42
Sanders started off with a huge SD deficit. He did NOTHING to help himself in IA.
Bleacher Creature
Feb 2016
#83