2016 Postmortem

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)

21. I'll anser every point you made later - I don't hve time right now.

Reply to jfern (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 06:25 PM

Jan 2016

But trust me, you won't be disappointed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

157 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's what you need to know about the 7 Clinton emails ... [View all] CajunBlazer Jan 2016 OP

Thank you ... NurseJackie Jan 2016 #1

Jackie, I hope that is not your union that is spending all of that money on Bernie CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #3

She would have to be a real nurse for that. It's from a tv show Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #60

There are 3,131,003 registered nurses in the United States CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #81

This message was self-deleted by its author Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #84

Results : LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #138

It's a great song. The lyrics are crude, but the title is perfect Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #139

It's a perfect song if you're intentionally trying to be rude and misogynistic to someone else. blue neen Jan 2016 #141

Instead of writing down the lyrics, Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #143

You posted the whole song. blue neen Jan 2016 #146

This message was self-deleted by its author Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #147

And with that many nurses in the US Plucketeer Jan 2016 #94

K&R! stonecutter357 Jan 2016 #2

Thanks for the kick... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #6

All of that is correct but it still won't stop the propaganda corporate media Iliyah Jan 2016 #4

Oh, that's another lie they thing this propaganda will support? n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #25

Frightened shitless Old Codger Jan 2016 #89

K&R mcar Jan 2016 #5

Let's see jfern Jan 2016 #7

I'll anser every point you made later - I don't hve time right now. CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #21

You have an inside line on the State Dept, elias49 Jan 2016 #50

I am glad he has offered to respond later riversedge Jan 2016 #56

^^^ This ^^^ senz Jan 2016 #23

+1 - also vouching for your counterpoints, as an IT/security bod. erronis Jan 2016 #86

A much more accurate list in my opinion. n/t A Simple Game Jan 2016 #99

To reiterate number 6 and it's the biggie... Jesus Malverde Jan 2016 #134

I don't know very much about IT SheilaT Jan 2016 #8

Actually Hillary's server had less chance of being hacked.... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #12

But if someone out there had caught on SheilaT Jan 2016 #27

There must be a lot of misinformation going around. I read the other day that A Simple Game Jan 2016 #98

Actually, I AM a data security professional, and you have no idea what you're talking about. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #150

LOL. But repeating Republican talking points against programs the vast majority mhatrw Jan 2016 #9

Don't try to change the subject. CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #17

PLEASE madamesilverspurs Jan 2016 #10

It wouldn't do a bit of good, my friend. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #28

Ye of little faith. retrowire Jan 2016 #65

If it did, my friend, I literally couldn't be more happy then to be wrong. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #80

I don't think malice is at hand either. retrowire Jan 2016 #85

What security matters - it had now useful information - and regardless it wasn't hacked CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #154

You really don't want that. This post demonstrates the poster does not or should not work in IT. nt jeff47 Jan 2016 #128

Twenty-two (22) top secrect emails! senz Jan 2016 #11

Wrong, it is 7 emails consisting of multiple pages. CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #18

7 email chains. 22 emails. Twenty-two emails. senz Jan 2016 #119

Your Bottom Line segment covers it. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #13

The FBI, IG, and State Dept are not involved in a rightwing conspiracy to bring down Hillary. askew Jan 2016 #45

I have no problem with the actions of... NCTraveler Jan 2016 #47

Well, it's quite clear that Hillary left behind a giant mess for Kerry to clean-up at State askew Jan 2016 #51

I have a different view of how the State Dept is doing. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #54

Well.... quickesst Jan 2016 #57

There's nothing to skew. askew Jan 2016 #72

Believe me... quickesst Jan 2016 #125

The FBI does not assign 150 agents to investigate a "smear". John Poet Jan 2016 #140

This seems to infer that we know all there is to know. We don't. We know what "they" libdem4life Jan 2016 #14

Oh well, I guess that all of those Republican Congressional investigations were a ... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #19

Most of them are...you're surprised? And do I believe that the 1% protects its own? libdem4life Jan 2016 #24

That's just nuts. The RW has been after both Clintons since Arkansas days... Hekate Jan 2016 #36

I agree. But that was then...this is now. Hard to go back to Hope, AR to dispense libdem4life Jan 2016 #41

One of my favorite books! Plus, I agree with your post. Duval Jan 2016 #63

Thanks. I think that makes us fairly old? libdem4life Jan 2016 #67

Here's what YOU need to know cali Jan 2016 #15

"I did nothing wrong." AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #16

You can't respond to post you show us a picture of a little dog as if... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #20

The OP is a steaming pile of excuses. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #22

I stopped reading at numbers 3, 4 and (the second)4 morningfog Jan 2016 #29

The OP is factually correct. Hekate Jan 2016 #34

Then tell everyone why it is wrong CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #35

It was not used only to communicate with other morningfog Jan 2016 #39

Please don't distort what I wrote CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #88

That's not what you wrote. No sense in lying. morningfog Jan 2016 #104

Every one of those items is factually wrong. askew Jan 2016 #43

I'm guessing that you didn't like my post CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #37

Well I responded, and I stand firmly behind this innocent puppy. libdem4life Jan 2016 #26

The puppy is absolutely adorable and you make a good point with the photo. Vinca Jan 2016 #40

he's way too cute to be mad at him AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #135

Bottom Line Z_California Jan 2016 #30

The wingers just keep investigating. Every time they hit a dead end, they start a new one. Ken Starr Hekate Jan 2016 #32

Thanks for truth and facts, Cajun. Alas, there is no known cure for Clinton Derangement Syndrome.... Hekate Jan 2016 #31

Your point #3 is simply false Dems to Win Jan 2016 #33

Sidney Blumenthall is long time friend of Clinton CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #48

That is not what you fucking said. Why lie? morningfog Jan 2016 #120

If all of this is true, the FBI needs to make an immediate statement clearing her of any wrongdoing. Vinca Jan 2016 #38

Every one of those 7 items is wrong. askew Jan 2016 #42

OP cleaarly has no actual IT chops Sivart Jan 2016 #44

Yeah, it sounds like it was written by Brian Fallon (Hillary's PR guy). It's completely askew Jan 2016 #46

Are you calling me a lier? CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #49

You are certainly uninformed. askew Jan 2016 #52

I’m calling you a bad speller :) dorkzilla Jan 2016 #101

That you're an IT professional is suspect to anyone who has worked in the field...nt Jesus Malverde Jan 2016 #137

If you worked for me, I surely would not promote you. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #151

I am an IT Senior Project Manager who supervises PM's who manage... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #132

This statement about the OP is false on its face, you're number 2 is sophistry at best... uponit7771 Jan 2016 #55

I don't think 3&4 is about "backing up." Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2016 #59

Again, that still isn't right. askew Jan 2016 #66

All fair arguments. Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2016 #122

State Dept has said it is a big impediment for them to find emails. askew Jan 2016 #124

Further to this claim Jarqui Jan 2016 #61

Exactly. This is a mess entirely of Hillary's own doing and I don't see why Dems askew Jan 2016 #68

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan is a Reagen appointee... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #74

That's not an answer. Loudestlib Jan 2016 #77

Nice try Jarqui Jan 2016 #91

Donald Trump deserves a bump! catnhatnh Jan 2016 #126

An excellent retort. retrowire Jan 2016 #69

Thank you. You should make this an OP to counter the misinformation Autumn Jan 2016 #110

Ahh , bless your heart. But you forgot where you are. DU is a full time, all day everyday randys1 Jan 2016 #53

Thanks for the post DesertRat Jan 2016 #58

To me HRC email has always been a non-starter, Mbrow Jan 2016 #62

Agreed...this whole stink is just that passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #64

This is far, far different from Benghazi. dorkzilla Jan 2016 #106

Why is the FBI ejbr Jan 2016 #70

well that's wunnerfull and all but here's the thing azurnoir Jan 2016 #71

Two things angrychair Jan 2016 #73

Data classification is nin the eye of the beholder CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #100

In response: Maedhros Jan 2016 #75

great response questionseverything Jan 2016 #153

Provide source information, instead of "what we should know,' as little touches on IT security. TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #76

No, a novice knows more than what is in this OP. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #130

K&R'd ghostsinthemachine Jan 2016 #78

Of course the most important one is THEY WERE NOT MARKED CLASSIFIED AT THE TIME THEY WERE SENT still_one Jan 2016 #79

EXACTLY. Hillary continues to have my support, and my vote. (nt) Paladin Jan 2016 #95

So Karl Rove was fine when he outed Plame? jeff47 Jan 2016 #131

**** Loudestlib Jan 2016 #82

IT professional? I'd love to see your justification for #6 fbc Jan 2016 #83

As to question #5 Separation Jan 2016 #87

+ 1,000,000 n/t asuhornets Jan 2016 #90

completely blown up - i've heard all the republicans critisizing her have done it too. MariaThinks Jan 2016 #92

Hey I'm IT too Lage Nom Ai Jan 2016 #93

lovely, but dead wrong on all points. Your claims have zip to do with being "an IT professional" magical thyme Jan 2016 #96

Yup. SoapBox Jan 2016 #105

I like the posts where you are a martial arts and self defense professional much better than this. Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #97

Well, I am that part time - call it a hobby that turned out to be a part time job, from which... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #107

You forgot MyNameGoesHere Jan 2016 #102

You may be an IT professional but you left out important details daybranch Jan 2016 #103

If you know government regulations on document classification - CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #111

Thank you. 840high Jan 2016 #112

#4 alone is easily disproved Major Nikon Jan 2016 #108

Thanks for the half-baked "insight", Trey Gowdy Tarc Jan 2016 #109

Sure, and your obviously well sourced and knowledgeable retort certainly helps Major Nikon Jan 2016 #117

Blah blah blah facts blah blah facts facts blah blah facts ... Empowerer Jan 2016 #113

Okay Folks, I have tried to get to all of your questions, but I'm tired of typing CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #114

I agree. It's not a big deal Major Nikon Jan 2016 #123

Everybody makes mistakes - no one is immune CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #133

22 email, 7 email chains. If you can't even get the most basic facts straight... Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #115

this time and money consuming harassment of democrats hopemountain Jan 2016 #116

K&R. Thank you for making it so clear. lunamagica Jan 2016 #118

This is a great post. Thanks! Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #121

Can't even get to #3 without lying? jeff47 Jan 2016 #127

Nailed it. Jesus Malverde Jan 2016 #136

I'm a data security professional; so are others on this thread. Maybe you are too. The OP is not. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #152

Ok so nothing illegal. Judgement wasn't good though, just like Iraq War vote. n/t Avalux Jan 2016 #129

THERE ARE 7 EMAILS SO SENSITIVE THE INVESTIGATORS CAN'T SEE THEM. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #142

I've got some news for you - the Gop & the Koch Bros & Karl are not going to read your list. jillan Jan 2016 #144

I actually feel sorry for those who Recced this Arazi Jan 2016 #145

I have no idea who you are & you have no creds here...who to believe? Sheepshank Jan 2016 #148

K & R. Thanks for the reasonable perspective. Surya Gayatri Jan 2016 #149

Kick DesertRat Jan 2016 #155

Excellent! Thanks !! RBInMaine Jan 2016 #156

Clinton is a horrible candidate, but I have yet to see anything scandalous about Clinton's emails Vattel Jan 2016 #157