Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Does Sen. Sanders believe there should be private property? [View all]Trajan
(19,089 posts)76. So tired of your ugly antics ...
Somewhere in the past, I used to like you ...
That was before I saw your penchant for cynical and fallacious pleadings ...
Now I see who you really are ... Shocking ...
Gone
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
189 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ha! Nice. Seriously, I'd be embarrassed to ask a question like that.
beam me up scottie
Jan 2016
#40
You didn't watch the instructional video someone was nice enough to post, did you?
beam me up scottie
Jan 2016
#117
Ah, I think the confusion is over the meaning of the word "socialist", then.
cheapdate
Jan 2016
#133
Then there are no excuses for your statements and they become sheer demagoguery
kristopher
Jan 2016
#188
Or maybe they got all that sorted out a while back and your OP seems tedious.
ancianita
Jan 2016
#159
You were done the minute you hit send and posted this thread, arely.
beam me up scottie
Jan 2016
#116
You sound as if you haven't been on here much. Or you'd already know what you're asking for.
ancianita
Jan 2016
#162
You reached out with an OP. Make the first attempt. BTW, that's not enough to use for Bernie.
ancianita
Jan 2016
#166
Then you've not read your own thread. You've gotten parameters, definitions and links. Use them.
ancianita
Jan 2016
#168
It's 16 years old. One definition isn't definitive; one definition never settles arguments in the
ancianita
Jan 2016
#176
Yep. But the 'face' states put on internationally assigns a certain value to their
ancianita
Jan 2016
#179
Swing voters are lazy or without long term interest in the country.The US is awash in information
ancianita
Jan 2016
#163
Wow! This is just bull. Perhaps you should read up on the topic before going all commie. nt
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2016
#4
Again, read up on the topic, instead of being spoon-fed bits and pieces. nt
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2016
#123
And there's always one person who graduates at the bottom of the class... (eom)
mak3cats
Jan 2016
#157
I'm in univ. for more Poli-Sci. Perhaps you need a refresher because nuanced thought escapes you. nt
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2016
#172
No--A blend of Regulated Capitalism, Pol. Democracy, and elements of a Welfare State (Which US is).
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2016
#174
Keep obfuscating. I didn't say it was Socialist, I said it's a Capitalist/Socialist hybrid. nt
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2016
#189
You're making the common assumption that the OP is asking an honest question and seeks an answer :)
arcane1
Jan 2016
#91
I know - I've just never seen them desperate enough to single out "private property"!
CharlotteVale
Jan 2016
#25
Archie Bunker is right! One just got an op hidden for actually calling Bernie a "commie".
beam me up scottie
Jan 2016
#29
Your incendiary ? is like asking: Does Hillary think non-millionaires have the right to vote nt
amborin
Jan 2016
#16
Another chickenshit alert fails miserably. And I think I'm in love with Juror #4
arcane1
Jan 2016
#92
Clearly you are doing something right, and it's hitting a sensitive, unprotected nerve.
arcane1
Jan 2016
#105
Now, now. Don't be so hard on them. They're breaking in a new bunch of swarmers.
hedda_foil
Jan 2016
#128
Communism is the only system I'm aware of where private property is prohibited.
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2016
#34
I first became suspicious of Bernie Sanders during the physical act of love, Mandrake
DefenseLawyer
Jan 2016
#45
We Clinton supporters are better than that...Of course Senator Sanders believes in private property.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jan 2016
#46
You appear to confuse "Private Property" with the "ownership of the means of production."
Agnosticsherbet
Jan 2016
#48
No. You are simply going to forfeit everything you own. (Just you, no one else.)
Katashi_itto
Jan 2016
#62
Didn't I just say y'all Clintonites had the Red Scare blinders up just last night?
VulgarPoet
Jan 2016
#77
Do you even know the difference between what Marxists call "private property" and
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2016
#84
This post tells me that Hillary HQ is in complete panic, telling their people to say ANYTHING.
reformist2
Jan 2016
#114
Oh, come on. Sanders might not be my first choice, but I sure don't care about that.
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#131
Does Hillary believe in killing Iraqi babies? she must, since she voted for a war that
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2016
#158