Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hedda_foil

(16,371 posts)
64. The only powerless VPs who are those with opposing views nominated to balance the ticket.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 06:50 PM
Jan 2016

The only VP I can recall who filled that bill was LBJ, whom JFK despised.

She would only be powerless as VP if President Sanders wanted her to be powerless. And I don't think there's any chance that he would want to shut her up or keep her away from the biggest national problems. Do you?

I'm not big on taking sitting Senators out of Congress and into the WH or cabinet, but this one.time, I'm all for it. I believe that the partnership of Bernie and Elizabeth in the White House would be in unstoppable.

K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #1
Whom could she be referring to? ypsfonos Jan 2016 #2
Hmm....Whom could it be?...who...who....who.. Segami Jan 2016 #6
lololol nt restorefreedom Jan 2016 #34
more lololol nt tomm2thumbs Jan 2016 #35
Will any pro-Hillary person dare post in this thread??? reformist2 Jan 2016 #19
I know I know I...pick me pick me...*raises hand* SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #25
Reminds me of the "little Johnny" jokes Mbrow Jan 2016 #43
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Divernan Jan 2016 #28
Ummmmmmm, no wait, Don't tell me.......... Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #44
let me guess......she's been tacitly endorsing Bernie for weeks now amborin Feb 2016 #66
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #3
Exactly! Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #4
It was, and needs to be reposted every now and again. She has to walk a fine line. libdem4life Jan 2016 #5
I think it depends just how negative Hillary gets/goes INdemo Jan 2016 #12
(shudder) You may be right. libdem4life Jan 2016 #13
I think you mean WHEN Hillary loses IA and NH Divernan Jan 2016 #29
isn't that what I posted ? INdemo Jan 2016 #37
No. Your original post read: "If Hillary loses IA and NH . . . ." Divernan Jan 2016 #46
Any rule against her teaming up with Bernie as VP before the primaries are over? Akicita Jan 2016 #38
None whatsoever, but I don't think it's in her best interest to do that, JMO. She carries a libdem4life Jan 2016 #41
Maybe not in her best personal interest but it would be in her Akicita Jan 2016 #42
I'm not disagreeing with you at all. I just think she needs to balance her own needs and her libdem4life Jan 2016 #57
No, it wouldn't be best there either. jeff47 Jan 2016 #58
The only powerless VPs who are those with opposing views nominated to balance the ticket. hedda_foil Jan 2016 #64
In the Senate, she can propose, pass and block legislation jeff47 Jan 2016 #65
K & R ! To the MAX!!! TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #7
let's see...Obama, Clinton, Krugman Doctor_J Jan 2016 #8
Very bright thinking behind these ideas. Bravo. Gregorian Jan 2016 #9
I wish she would do more than just give a speech. Skwmom Jan 2016 #10
It will happen Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #11
True leaders don't wait to jump in until it's more convenient to do so. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #14
I think you got it right Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #49
If she was serious she would have run. joshcryer Jan 2016 #52
10:15 forward. That's little swipe at Her Inevitableness. No question. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #15
Spot on Liz, now can we get your supporters out of the billionaire camp called Hillary for pResident ViseGrip Jan 2016 #16
Does Hillary support full disclosure of who donates to her SuperPACs? reformist2 Jan 2016 #17
she laughed at that too when asked INdemo Jan 2016 #20
She laughs a lot. Means 840high Jan 2016 #47
those who "slither around Washington" - LOVE IT - to the point!!!! tomm2thumbs Jan 2016 #18
thanks Liz! now get your supporters out of the billionaires bed with an endorsement. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #21
And the truth shall set you free. SmittynMo Jan 2016 #22
Kick libodem Jan 2016 #23
She was referring to members of Congress who oppose campaign finance reform. NT Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #24
your profile picture is too hilarious tomm2thumbs Jan 2016 #36
I want to see Hillary in a NASCAR suit with all her corporate sponsors INdemo Jan 2016 #40
K+R!!! draa Jan 2016 #26
Can't imagine who she might have saltpoint Jan 2016 #27
*** (except for reparations) uponit7771 Jan 2016 #30
Warren's war on "No We Can't" appears to be mobilizing!! Woot! n/t 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #31
Ha!!! wolfie001 Jan 2016 #32
. shawn703 Jan 2016 #33
Kick... Stellar Jan 2016 #39
Shills called in her favors, Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #45
good point. nt retrowire Jan 2016 #50
Now let's see if she gets in bed with the billionaire-supported candidate on the Democratic side emsimon33 Jan 2016 #48
Elizabeth Warren, You Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #51
So why isn't she endorsing Bernie? book_worm Jan 2016 #53
Sanders/Warren 2016! n/t californiabernin Jan 2016 #54
Do it Elizabeth! glinda Jan 2016 #55
Come on Liz! Get your supporters out of those billionaires beds! ENDORSE!!!!! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #56
IKR? It's coming tho farleftlib Jan 2016 #59
k and r ...our next VP. Ivan Kaputski Jan 2016 #60
It's not really that simple, but it's an essential point. Orsino Jan 2016 #61
Why isn't this in GD? Octafish Jan 2016 #62
I wonder if she meant to say "Anyone who says INCREMENTAL change is just too hard" NorthCarolina Jan 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»VIDEO: Elizabeth Warren: ...»Reply #64