Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)107. Ok, then don't.
BFD
Drama.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
244 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I wouldn't have a problem voting for O'Malley if he where the nominee. n/t
TIME TO PANIC
Jan 2016
#182
Your views certainly don't align with the "mainstream candidate" in that regard
Renew Deal
Jan 2016
#11
You must believe that your vote belongs to you and not to a politician, party, or forum. K&R
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2016
#16
I didnt think it was possible to oppose in anyway what I said, but you managed to
randys1
Jan 2016
#160
So you are debating my statement that if cons take over the govt people will die?
randys1
Jan 2016
#166
The millions of children in the ME and NA who've suffered, been maimed, killed, are
polly7
Jan 2016
#132
No. But it's obvious to me the mention of those children is just more 'drama' to you. nt.
polly7
Jan 2016
#153
And did you notice any whining, threats, outrage over Rendell choosing to support Bloomberg
in_cog_ni_to
Jan 2016
#105
I'm not the onethrowing a temper tantrum daring the Admins to ban me
alcibiades_mystery
Jan 2016
#46
It's clear you just want to have your little temper tantrum and have people to bounce it off of
alcibiades_mystery
Jan 2016
#54
My concern is if this meme gets louder, the Bernie or bust stuff, that if Bernie does lose
randys1
Jan 2016
#138
And yet, as we saw earlier today, Ed Rendell is allowed to be a PUMA with no condemnation.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#56
So there are moderate Dems who will on occasion (as opposed to 24/7 like all cons) be
randys1
Jan 2016
#144
When "go fuck yourself loser" is allowed to stand I know this place has jumped the shark.
CBGLuthier
Jan 2016
#79
It is truly pathetic that people can tell others to fuck off and not get a hide.
PoliticalMalcontent
Jan 2016
#84
No. Because we have people like Bernie Sanders who want us to stay involved.
rusty quoin
Jan 2016
#82
I'm not an admirer of Sanders but a supporter of Clinton. I'm not stupid, so I will vote for
demosincebirth
Jan 2016
#55
Loser talk. Enjoy President Trump. That goes for any Bernie or Hillary fan that won't back
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#61
Newbies here, like you, who agitate for others to not support the Democratic Party nominee
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#167
Said in the thread where the Bernie supporters are talking about not supporting HC.
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#171
Yes it is. And anyone who doesn't realize it foolish and unaware. Remember, they didn't just
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#159
Thanks for your straw man argument but that's not the debate point I made here right now. nt
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#161
No. It's important that we GOTV. That's how we ensure victory. Not staying home because we're bitter
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#169
You've got blinders on. Enjoy President Trump. Maybe then you'll learn, after he destroys America.nt
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#173
"Electablity" isn't the debate point I made here but your straw man argument is very GOP.
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#185
Still loser talk. Either from Bernie or Hillary supporters. facts is facts. GOTV is the only thing!
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#189
You are Karl Rove's wet dream. Democratic Party voters staying home on election day is what he
TeamPooka
Jan 2016
#196
Some actually are here doing a job for Karl Rove, not sure how many, but count on it.
randys1
Jan 2016
#141
Dark Angel, your vote is your business. You don't do anyone but the McCarthyites any favors
merrily
Jan 2016
#77
The flaw in your analysis is we don't have popular vote elections for president.
jeff47
Jan 2016
#184
Not a single Hillary supporter spoke against Rendell for floating not backing the nominee.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#135
HEY!, i had to vote for DUKAKIS! bloody LURCH!! FUCKING JOE LIEBERFUCKENPUTZ! if i have to,
pansypoo53219
Jan 2016
#92
Because she feels like it and is a member who feels like discussing. Why is anyone here? nt.
polly7
Jan 2016
#146
I find that level of what to me seems like real hatred curious also - vile, horrible insults
polly7
Jan 2016
#215
ooooh, the loyalists aren't pleased with you! I am surprised you only got one unhinged PM!nt
m-lekktor
Jan 2016
#124
Bernie will be disappointed, because he will need Hillary in the WH if it cant be him, to have ANY
randys1
Jan 2016
#131
I support Bernie, but if Hillary gets the nomination I WILL VOTE FOR HER! You should too!
B Calm
Jan 2016
#154
Herr Trump appreciates all you are doing to ensure his election to Führer of Amerika
workinclasszero
Jan 2016
#187
Some people seem to be operating under a misunderstanding of the TOS, it applies NOW.
seaglass
Jan 2016
#225
Another Sanders supporter stating that s/he won't vote for Hillary if she's the nominee. 50 recs!
Metric System
Jan 2016
#227
I cannot believe how many have forgotten what it was like to live under 8 yrs of Bush.
seaglass
Jan 2016
#233
You are actually a tiny minority. And since you won't vote for the nominee
KittyWampus
Jan 2016
#229
I don't think I can vote for someone who lies when it makes no sense to. I just can't
kelly1mm
Jan 2016
#235