2016 Postmortem

padfun

(1,872 posts)

18. You sound like you work at one of those

Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:45 PM

Jan 2016

Republican phone banks. Or now days, a internet room where they pay to roam the forums and give misleading information.

And I'll bet we hear from more and more of these hot rooms. Looking at post counts can be revealing as well.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oh, my. The Wall Street Journal says, "It’s time to take Bernie Sanders seriously." [View all] antigop Jan 2016 OP

Rupert Murdoch's WSJ takes Bernie seriously now? fascinating! emulatorloo Jan 2016 #1

Of course they will Thenewire Jan 2016 #4

add +1 to the "Bernie is unelectable" meme counter. nt antigop Jan 2016 #5

One-Wrong. daleanime Jan 2016 #6

sorry but your wrong if you think that Robbins Jan 2016 #12

You are SOOOOO dismissive of his VP choice. Or did you forget about that? nt valerief Jan 2016 #13

Wow... chervilant Jan 2016 #15

I distinctly remember both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama being Gene Debs Jan 2016 #16

LOL -- Good line. Armstead Jan 2016 #35

+1000 -- when they start sounding that disconnected from reality - I do wonder Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #43

Hate to confuse you with facts . . . hueymahl Jan 2016 #17

You sound like you work at one of those padfun Jan 2016 #18

Right, because Pantsuit is trouncing all the Republicans in one-on-one polling matchups. Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #19

You are wrong. leftcoastmountains Jan 2016 #24

Actually, it's the GOP's only chance floriduck Jan 2016 #25

Failures? Geronimoe Jan 2016 #27

Polling shows Bernie trouncing Trump, but you know that. NorthCarolina Jan 2016 #28

Drink! artislife Jan 2016 #30

I agree completely.. asuhornets Jan 2016 #32

I am so sick of hearing people say Obama is in anyway electable. (2008) Armstead Jan 2016 #34

now don't get sick,you poor thing! ,stranger things wendylaroux Jan 2016 #36

Then why does he do better in the one v one polls than Hillary? Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #40

I'm not about to repeat this to everyone else who is making the same false assumption. Thenewire Jan 2016 #42

BS - the Reich has 20 years of opposition research on Hillary - They can t wait to use it Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #44

Sanders gets cross-over votes, Clinton does not. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #47

I am surprised they didn't call him a "communist" awake Jan 2016 #2

gotta keep your powder dry. They're waiting for the GE FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #3

Claire McCaskil went there...no problem for her. libdem4life Jan 2016 #45

Which means the attacks by the corporate media will soon begin book_worm Jan 2016 #7

Bring-'em appal_jack Jan 2016 #8

Clinton scandals... asuhornets Jan 2016 #33

No matter how much you wish it away... appal_jack Jan 2016 #38

Oh Plzz.. asuhornets Jan 2016 #39

Yea, but should we worry about it, seriously? nolabels Jan 2016 #10

WSJ/Fox media first. Then other outlets will pick it up as they are scared of being called 'biased' emulatorloo Jan 2016 #11

Bring it... DUbeornot2be Jan 2016 #20

In Iowa, Clinton leads by 4 points in the Real Clear Politics average. Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #9

she had more than a 3 point lead over Obama at RCL with just 10 days left before the '08 Iowa Caucus corkhead Jan 2016 #22

here it comes retrowire Jan 2016 #14

Attention 1%ers! We rabble have been roused corkhead Jan 2016 #21

Hehe. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #23

Pitchfork and Torch are ready Half-Century Man Jan 2016 #26

Oooh,good one! wendylaroux Jan 2016 #37

The WSJ editors are a bunch of Johnnies-come-lately Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #29

"Note to WSJ: He's a DEMOCRATIC socialist." SoapBox Jan 2016 #31

The one huge issue is that Sanders will start the debate all over again for the rladdi Jan 2016 #41

Let's hear it for the Pitchfork Voters!! libdem4life Jan 2016 #46