Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

yellowcanine

(36,207 posts)

1. The irony is that many "industry funded studies" are require by FDA and EPA.

Reply to HuckleB (Original post)

Fri May 9, 2014, 10:56 AM

May 2014

The regulatory approval process often requires that industry fund studies by independent researchers. The industry has no control over design of the studies or reporting of results. But yet the fact that they funded the study will be cited as a reason for doubting it. It is diabolical.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

About Those Industry Funded GMO Studies . . . [View all] HuckleB Feb 2014 OP

The irony is that many "industry funded studies" are require by FDA and EPA. yellowcanine May 2014 #1

Agree shehasmoxy May 2014 #2

Nice anti-GMO propaganda, you're offering there. HuckleB May 2014 #3

All I Want for Mother’s Day is Non-labeled GMOs HuckleB May 2014 #4

Professor: What exactly is this mythical ‘pristine’ alternative to GMOs that presents no risks? HuckleB Jul 2014 #5

Hey, let's go back to when none of the plants we ate were genetically modified! trotsky Aug 2014 #6

Anti-GMO claim examined: Does genetic engineering foster monoculture? HuckleB Aug 2014 #7

Professor: What exactly is this mythical pristine alternative to GMOs that presents no risks? HuckleB Aug 2014 #8