Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
In reply to the discussion: Physicists watch quantum particles tunnel through solid barriers. Here's what they found. [View all]Jim__
(14,063 posts)24. I was referring to a paragraph in the article.
Subatomic particles all have magnetic properties and when magnets are in an external magnetic field, they rotate like a spinning top. The amount of rotation (also called precession) depends on how long the particle is bathed in that magnetic field. Knowing that, the Toronto group used a magnetic field to form their barrier. When particles are inside the barrier, they precess. Outside it, they don't. So measuring how long the particles precess told the researchers how long those atoms took to tunnel through the barrier.
Specifically to these 2 sentences: When particles are inside the barrier, they precess. Outside it, they don't.
The way I read those sentences, the particles will not precess unless they pass inside the barrier. It was that paragraph that raised the question with me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Physicists watch quantum particles tunnel through solid barriers. Here's what they found. [View all]
Judi Lynn
Aug 2020
OP
From my link: "When particles are inside the barrier, they precess. Outside it, they don't."
Jim__
Aug 2020
#11
OK. I can't argue about quantum theory. But the article does talk about the velocity of the ...
Jim__
Aug 2020
#15
You clearly didn't read the article clearly. The barrier was NOT a mass. It was magnetic. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2020
#48
You claimed it was because it had mass. It does not have mass. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2020
#50
You wrote it was impossible to be in the barrier because of MASS. Further, photons aren't affected
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2020
#52
Quantum gravity not been proven, so, no, mass does not affect transmission of photons through mass.
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2020
#54
So now you are against people making "general statements" the way you made general statements.
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2020
#56
1) Rubidium atoms are not "subatomic", 2) Precession only occurs inside the barrier
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2020
#47
by the way, another experiment "Definitively" found it was near instantaneous
qazplm135
Aug 2020
#59
Richard Feynman- "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechan
TrogL
Aug 2020
#5
Interesting. According to one of the books I read (by Brian Greene? Roger Penrose?)...
CaptainTruth
Aug 2020
#27