Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
In reply to the discussion: Quantum Entanglement, Dark Counts, Coincidence Detection [View all]drm604
(16,230 posts)87. I haven't programmed at the hardware level in decades.
I'm currently doing web development which is about as far from that as you can get. I'd love to do some low level C or even assembly programming, although I imagine even microcontroller programming may be done at a higher level these days.
Talking about programming, imagine if you could send bits back in time by even a tiny amount. If that could be shrunk down and replicated at the level we currently build circuitry, it would be an amazing advance in processing speeds. We could have essentially instantaneous computing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
knowing they exist and know what everyone else calls them are two different things.
nebenaube
Jul 2013
#6
I don't see why what I need would be any bigger then say a .22 slug (for lack of a better reference)
nebenaube
Jul 2013
#37
Sorry for he late reply, bu yeah, I've been working with an optical breadboard
mindwalker_i
May 2014
#79
My intuition tells me the past and the future are rather symmetrical about any local present.
hunter
May 2014
#75