Religion

kwassa

(23,340 posts)

24. I ignore nothing.

Wed Feb 1, 2012, 04:27 PM

Feb 2012

You attempt to divert, you fail, so what else is new?

You made a direct response attacking the questioner and avoided his question.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Feminists can be Christians, too [View all] rug Jan 2012 OP

Feminists can be dummies, too. provis99 Jan 2012 #1

And provis99, you've convinced me. DU'ers can be bigots too. Swamp Lover Jan 2012 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author cleanhippie Jan 2012 #9

Intelligent people have been religious for all of human history, all over the world. kwassa Feb 2012 #14

Some intelligent people aren't religious Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #68

To do so, she must pretend that much of Paul's teachings are not in the faith Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #3

Some need to decide whether they are Paulists or Christians. Kurmudgeon Jan 2012 #5

No True Scotsman. provis99 Jan 2012 #6

Knee jerk response. Kurmudgeon Feb 2012 #31

brilliant display of logic. provis99 Feb 2012 #38

Of course they can! Kurmudgeon Jan 2012 #4

the mistake is confusing "christian" with "religious" pnwest Jan 2012 #7

The vast majority of religion, and the vast majority of Christian churches, darkstar3 Jan 2012 #8

I've never assumed that. Swamp Lover Feb 2012 #10

I don't find your contributions here interesting. QED. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #12

Why did you avoid his question? kwassa Feb 2012 #13

Did you happen to miss darkstar3 Feb 2012 #15

Attack the messenger rather than deal with his message. kwassa Feb 2012 #17

Wrong. Again you ignore that it was a direct response to the question at hand. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #18

I ignore nothing. kwassa Feb 2012 #24

Just what was the question? cleanhippie Feb 2012 #27

Contradiction in itself does not constitute an argument. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author kwassa Feb 2012 #44

Amazing how some presume to think they know how everyone of an organization or group thinks. Kurmudgeon Feb 2012 #32

Be thankful for the increasing number that do nt Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #69

Let's be thankful for increasing number that do nt Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #70

Jesus Christ said men are the head of women, so a feminist Christians have ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #11

What exactly are you trying to quote? struggle4progress Feb 2012 #20

I am trying to quote the Christian Holy Bible. ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #21

This is Paul, not Jesus, who says this. And, maybe not Paul, either. kwassa Feb 2012 #25

So parts of the bible aren't what many people think they are? cleanhippie Feb 2012 #28

No. kwassa Feb 2012 #39

Yes. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #42

so, you have the power to change my answer to whatever you think it should be? kwassa Feb 2012 #46

I have the power to recognize when someone is being obtuse cleanhippie Feb 2012 #48

Like I said, pick and choose. No part of the Christian Holy Bible was written by Jesus Christ. nt ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #30

Of course not. No one said that Jesus wrote it. kwassa Feb 2012 #40

No, that was Paul. Another reason why I make distinction between Paulists and Christians. Kurmudgeon Feb 2012 #33

No book in the Christian Holy Bible is attributed to Jesus. ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #34

This argument you are making doesn't make much sense. kwassa Feb 2012 #41

"Pick and choose" wasn't an argument; it was an observation. ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #45

It's called a rational approch to literary criticism nt Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #71

Wouldn't a rational approach consider all the miracles and supernatural parts metaphors? ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #73

Which means you engage in fallacy. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #36

Most of the female Christian clergy I know are quite feminist. kwassa Feb 2012 #16

I'm trying to remember a saying...how does it go... darkstar3 Feb 2012 #19

and many thousands of exceptions to this one ... kwassa Feb 2012 #22

Agree cbayer Feb 2012 #23

"thousands of exceptions"...all of them Episcopal, I'm sure. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #37

"Today, over half of all American Protestant denominations ordain women, kwassa Feb 2012 #43

See, now you're just amusing me. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #47

I'm glad you are amused by being wrong. It is big of you. kwassa Feb 2012 #49

There are so many things wrong with your post that it's hard to know where to begin. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #50

It is too bad you can't point out what is wrong. kwassa Feb 2012 #61

In response: darkstar3 Feb 2012 #63

What? Many of those denominations ordain women ButterflyBlood Feb 2012 #51

Good for them. That doesn't mean those denominations treat women equally. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #52

In what way do they not? ButterflyBlood Feb 2012 #54

Go read the wiki post, darkstar3 Feb 2012 #56

Well let's look at your checklist in my church ButterflyBlood Feb 2012 #59

You really think it was a "checklist"? darkstar3 Feb 2012 #60

You are wrong once again. kwassa Feb 2012 #62

When I was younger, women's church groups tended to focus on one of two things, sometimes both Nikia Feb 2012 #67

Facts trump moving goal posts. rug Feb 2012 #53

Yes they do. Ordination is not equality. Switching to ordination was moving the goal posts. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #57

I suspect your complaint is not really about equality. rug Feb 2012 #58

Ordination is the most powerful position in a church. It is equality. kwassa Feb 2012 #64

That's not what you said a few minutes ago. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #65

Are you certain? Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2012 #66

I son't know where you got your list from, Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #72

An "insider" is "always a better source than an outsider." darkstar3 Feb 2012 #74

Who the hell CAN'T be a Christian? AlbertCat Feb 2012 #26

Winner. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #29

Yes, the above comment is a winner, for sure. n/t MarkCharles Feb 2012 #55