Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 05:38 PM Nov 2012

Will atheists decide the next election? [View all]

http://www.examiner.com/article/will-atheists-decide-the-next-election

The presidential election is over and the Pew Research Center has released new data on November 7th, which suggests that there may be a new voter bloc on the rise. The religiously unaffiliated might have decided this election and will almost certainly decide the next election.

The religiously unaffiliated made up an estimated 12% of voters in the 2012 election based on exit polling. This number was unchanged from the 2008 election despite the fact that religiously unaffiliated Americas increased significantly since then. This indicated that many religiously unaffiliated Americans felt disenfranchised this election cycle and decided not to vote in this election cycle.

Out of those religiously unaffiliated Americans who did vote, 70% of them voted for Barack Obama compared to only 26% for Mitt Romney. Even despite the fact that many atheists have lost their enthusiasm for the president.

...

If the Democratic Party could get more religiously unaffiliated Americans to the polls, that would certainly help them in the next election. But if the Republican Party could appeal to more atheistic voters, they would be cutting into one of their opponent’s most loyal voting blocs. Plus, if trends continue, it is likely that in 2016 there will be even more religiously unaffiliated Americans. Whether or not those unaffiliated Americans become religiously unaffiliated voters could very well swing the next presidential election.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The GOP really appeals to me when they use "God" in every second sentence. rzemanfl Nov 2012 #1
As long as it isn't the mormons. nt lyingsackofmitt Nov 2012 #2
How does nonbelief affect politics? rug Nov 2012 #3
Knee-jerk reaction against the more religious party, perhaps? LAGC Nov 2012 #21
I like the term "religiously unaffiliated". You called it "atheist" BlueStreak Nov 2012 #4
Well said! nt. Starboard Tack Nov 2012 #5
Actually, "atheism" is quite explicit; lack of belief. cleanhippie Nov 2012 #6
Atheist implies you don't believe something. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #8
Then you cannot define a demographic group around it BlueStreak Nov 2012 #9
Sure you can: people who don't believe in gods. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #10
Which means precisely what, politically? rug Nov 2012 #11
It doesn't have to mean anything other than its identity. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #12
I tend to agree but that belies the premise of the OP. rug Nov 2012 #13
Not really. It could happen that the bald men with ear hair demographic Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #14
If that were the case, the reason would not be baldness. rug Nov 2012 #15
Back to the premise of this thread BlueStreak Nov 2012 #16
I'm not an atheist. rug Nov 2012 #17
No, I didn't. trotsky Nov 2012 #19
There's a good chance the next presidential election will be a woman against a man. dimbear Nov 2012 #7
How about we just let the people decide the next election Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #18
re: Promethean Nov 2012 #20
No. Not for decades; generations perhaps. Not even close. nt dmallind Nov 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Will atheists decide the ...»Reply #0