Religion
In reply to the discussion: Atheist group sends 2nd complaint about war memorial [View all]humblebum
(5,881 posts)In the context "respect" is used, it means 'regarding or 'with regard to....' And you totally ignore "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" part.
That why the courts apply the lemon test. There is no automatic rejection of religion from any public square, nor has there ever been in the US.
And Madison was just one voice and we are not an autocracy. He also said many other things about religion and government, i.e.
"It may not be easy, in every possible case, to trace the line of separation between the rights of religion and the Civil authority with such distinctness as to avoid collisions and doubts on unessential points. The tendency to unsurpastion on one side or the other, or to a corrupting coalition or alliance between them, will be best guarded agst. by an entire abstinence of the Gov't from interfence in any way whatsoever, beyond the necessity of preserving public order, and protecting each sect agst. trespasses on its legal rights by others." James Madison, in a letter to Rev Jasper Adams spring 1832, from James Madison on Religious Liberty, edited by Robert S. Alley, pp. 237-238
He also said:
"It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage and such only as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent, both in order of time and in degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe: And if a member of Civil Society, do it with a saving of his allegiance to the Universal Sovereign.
We maintain therefore that in matters of Religion, no man's right is abridged by the institution of Civil Society and that Religion is wholly exempt from its cognizance."