Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hurl

(937 posts)
9. Good question
Sun Jan 24, 2021, 10:46 PM
Jan 2021

It was posted in the Religion group because religion is not incidental to the story. Religion (not atheism) was a central motivating factor for several of people involved, though certainly not all. Similarly, it was not posted in the Atheist group because we had zero reports of people motivated specifically by atheism who participated or wanted to claim the country in the name of atheism. Of course some of the insurrectionists very likely were atheists like the people you mentioned. Few groups of any size are asshole-free.

The article doesn't by any stretch label all churches as terrorist organizations. I would say it had a couple of points: First, we have an obviously active Christian Nationalist/Dominionist movement in this country, and articles calling this to broader attention can help us keep an eye on these groups. Second was to point out Christian privilege by contrasting how differently this story would have been portrayed had groups of Muslims prayed to Allah during an insurrection.

I am not interested in bashing religion. I AM interested in bashing those who use religion as an excuse to oppose democracy, and this article illustrates that those people are among us.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»There's Video of Christia...»Reply #9