Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)

6. They saved no lives. They killed in retribution.

Reply to Post removed (Reply #4)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 11:51 AM

Sep 2018

Only if the person they killed was the only person who performed abortions might they have saved lives. That was not their motive. They killed to punish.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would you kill one to save many? [View all] Soph0571 Sep 2018 OP

yes. Its more sinful to allow the many to be killed, if sin could be measured, its obvious beachbum bob Sep 2018 #1

I have no idea what sin is. It is less wrong Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #3

Ah Trolley Puzzles. Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #2

Post removed Post removed Sep 2018 #4

No, they didn't SCantiGOP Sep 2018 #5

They saved no lives. They killed in retribution. MineralMan Sep 2018 #6

Even that assumes that a fetus is a life that can be saved. Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #9

That's true. MineralMan Sep 2018 #10

What the ever loving fuck? Iggo Sep 2018 #14

Personally, I would not. MineralMan Sep 2018 #7

In the classic trolley puzzle there is no doubt Voltaire2 Sep 2018 #8

In reality, however, most people would freeze and do nothing. MineralMan Sep 2018 #11

The trolley problem really reveals two base type of ethics qazplm135 Oct 2018 #16

Fortunately, it never comes up. Cartoonist Sep 2018 #12

A more realistic version marylandblue Sep 2018 #13

I'd be tempted to kill the guy who keeps tying all these people to the railroad tracks... Iggo Sep 2018 #15