Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Natura naturata & natura naturans [View all]
 

tama

(9,137 posts)
7. Just out of curiosity?
Wed Dec 21, 2011, 03:14 AM
Dec 2011

BTW which believes of mine are you referring to? I'm not a "theist" (nor atheist), but I've expressed the belief that it is possible to consider "God" just a word, and I can self-validate that possibility just by myself, without changing "the meaning for other people and the way it is engraved into society", except for my little part, which is also a part of larger society, no matter how insignificant part on the "grand scale of matters".

I was just inspired by what you said about logics starting with "if", and expanded on the theme. Experimentalist "if" without knowing what "then" are the most curious ifs, IMHO.

Thanks for that interesting post. Jim__ Dec 2011 #1
One side believes in God/s the other doesn't uriel1972 Dec 2011 #2
Just a word tama Dec 2011 #3
more than 'just a word' uriel1972 Dec 2011 #4
Perhaps so tama Dec 2011 #5
Eh why would I want to do that? uriel1972 Dec 2011 #6
Just out of curiosity? tama Dec 2011 #7
Look at it this way uriel1972 Dec 2011 #8
I look at it this way tama Dec 2011 #9
I never said it was about the word uriel1972 Dec 2011 #10
Horrors of the world? tama Dec 2011 #12
Who's side of the question are you inquiring into? westerebus Dec 2011 #11
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Natura naturata & nat...»Reply #7