Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
2. Truthfully, I don't have a problem with them opting out of military service.
Tue Feb 27, 2018, 09:31 PM
Feb 2018

They're not alone in that, and it's honorable enough taken in its own terms. What gets me is that non-military national service is an option, admittedly longer but still just under a year, and they refuse that too. And the third option which other naysayers have endured is to spend the time in prison, which Amnesty International is not a fan of. There are a lot of people who disapprove of warfare for motives at least as good as the JWs but who aren't exempted, and I'd emphatically agree with the court that they don't deserve worse treatment than the JW crowd.

I'm also frankly somewhat ignorant of a good reason why non-military national service would be unacceptable, though. We're talking about Finland, for crying out loud. What could they possibly have these young men doing?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Jehovah's Witness exempti...»Reply #2