Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I think this movement needs a little diversity. cbayer Apr 2012 #1
If there were a few more women involved, I doubt they'd be swapping for porn rug Apr 2012 #2
Are you talking about the RCC? Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #24
Where, in the African, Asian, or Latin American dioceses? rug Apr 2012 #31
I'm talking about the place of women in the church. Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #34
Thye post you replied to mentioned "more women and people of color." rug Apr 2012 #35
No, I'm not Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #37
Other than Hoyos, what is your dissatisfaction with the ethnic and racial diversity of the RCC? rug Apr 2012 #42
That all came out after the selection Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #43
They just get more popular every day. nt humblebum Apr 2012 #54
They do indeed. ;) nt eqfan592 Apr 2012 #55
Indeed they do, and at the expense of religion, too! cleanhippie Apr 2012 #56
Yes, everyone knows religion exploits women and porn doesn't. humblebum Apr 2012 #57
Well, at the very least, religion exploits children... cleanhippie Apr 2012 #100
Hmmm...I think you're missing something. eqfan592 Apr 2012 #102
everyone knows religion exploits women and porn doesn't. AlbertCat Apr 2012 #109
I find this as annoying qazplm Apr 2012 #3
Well, the important thing... Ian David Apr 2012 #6
Come on now, Kelvin Mace Apr 2012 #9
Saying there are too many dicks is like saying there are too many flowers. Ian David Apr 2012 #12
I find this as annoying as proselytizing by religious folk. AlbertCat Apr 2012 #110
There's no misogyny if it's gay male porn. n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #4
That's true, but probably unlikely. They bought 30 pounds of porn from a single seller cbayer Apr 2012 #16
"They bought 30 pounds of porn from a single seller" Rob H. Apr 2012 #58
Actually it was 140 pounds for $30! cbayer Apr 2012 #61
Man! Rob H. Apr 2012 #62
Maybe it's an estate sale? cbayer Apr 2012 #64
Ha! I can just see it Rob H. Apr 2012 #88
Sounds like a win-win FBaggins Apr 2012 #5
Do not taunt rabid dogs Kelvin Mace Apr 2012 #7
How to win friends and supporters by being offensive and rude. Speck Tater Apr 2012 #8
I keep telling people Kelvin Mace Apr 2012 #10
It depends on who their targeted audience is, and what their desired result is. Ian David Apr 2012 #13
Looks like it might be a combination of 1 and 3 cbayer Apr 2012 #46
They're not going to SPREAD Atheism that way. Ian David Apr 2012 #66
What's your church doing to fight against misogyny, rug? trotsky Apr 2012 #11
They stopped burning "witches." n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #14
Gotta love progress! trotsky Apr 2012 #21
What are you doing to fight against misogyny, trotsky? rug Apr 2012 #18
You're right, I do lots more than you and your church. n/t trotsky Apr 2012 #19
I'll take you word for it. rug Apr 2012 #22
Good for them Buzz cook Apr 2012 #15
I believe the swapping of bibles for porn to be a dumb, unfunny and destructive , sophomoric ladjf Apr 2012 #17
I'll believe that you actually care about misogyny beyond your rhetorical convenience darkstar3 Apr 2012 #20
Do you believe I care about your belief? rug Apr 2012 #23
Way to not yet address the hypocrisy of your post. Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #25
Ah, so you approve this stunt because the RCC is misogynist. rug Apr 2012 #26
Build your strawmen somewhere else. Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #27
This OP is about swapping Bibles for porn. rug Apr 2012 #28
OK, guess we have to go through this one step at a time Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #29
Wrong step. rug Apr 2012 #30
Not the wrong step Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #32
You are asserting two different things. rug Apr 2012 #36
Funny. You still don't answer the question. Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #39
From the article you posted: eqfan592 Apr 2012 #33
That's an interesting and plausible view. rug Apr 2012 #38
How the fuck do you know? Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #40
To quote a teacher of communication, "How the fuck do you know" their intent? rug Apr 2012 #44
Did you read that article? Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #48
Calling upon your mystical mind-reading powers again, I see. trotsky Apr 2012 #41
I know what you're up to. You're your usual transparent self. rug Apr 2012 #47
So contrary to what the group says their intent is Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #50
Sure. rug Apr 2012 #60
Not only do I not doubt that was their intent... eqfan592 Apr 2012 #45
These are the alternatives: rug Apr 2012 #49
I would say that those were all objectives... eqfan592 Apr 2012 #51
This is their president's statement of intent cbayer Apr 2012 #52
Probably set up more booths? eqfan592 Apr 2012 #53
Fair enough. rug Apr 2012 #59
You've been proven wrong, and been quite belligerent in defending your wrongness... trotsky Apr 2012 #65
Now, trotsky, that is the difference between you and a nondisruptive poster. rug Apr 2012 #68
Stayin' classy indeed. trotsky Apr 2012 #82
Fortunately, I dont form my perception of atheists based on you or your posts. rug Apr 2012 #86
No, that's pretty clear. trotsky Apr 2012 #91
Because that would mean the atheists have a point. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #67
Oh? Are you distributing porn? rug Apr 2012 #69
What the hell does that have to do with anything? 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #70
Just the OP. rug Apr 2012 #72
Pro tip: in order for a snappy reply to actually be snappy... 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #73
Follow it. rug Apr 2012 #74
Dude. That's old. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #75
Dude. rug Apr 2012 #76
Er, you may not like rug. You may disagree with rug. But his snappiness is pretty cbayer Apr 2012 #77
I can only assume that you were either darkstar3 Apr 2012 #78
It's the team. Rah rah go team. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #104
Sox do rule and Yankees do suck. cbayer Apr 2012 #107
Can't argue against THAT. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #112
Good for him. trotsky Apr 2012 #83
Well that explains a lot. Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #85
It's astonishing, the lengths you will go to avoid mr blur Apr 2012 #63
Considering the OP is not about the Catholic Church, rug Apr 2012 #71
The OP is about you taking issue with something and revealing a certain hypocrisy. darkstar3 Apr 2012 #79
Why don't you comment on the article instead of attempting another diversion? rug Apr 2012 #80
Why don't you actually reply to a point put to you for once? darkstar3 Apr 2012 #81
Do you support this group distributing pornography. rug Apr 2012 #84
Had they come to me Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #87
Not so fast. rug Apr 2012 #94
I'm on my phone Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #103
Truly fascinating and oh-so-telling. trotsky Apr 2012 #106
You are off on many points. Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #111
I could answer easily, but it's not germane to the OP or the subthread. darkstar3 Apr 2012 #89
I see. You could answer easily. But you don't. rug Apr 2012 #90
More inartful dodging. If you have nothing to say about your hypocrisy, then why say anything here? darkstar3 Apr 2012 #92
How many posts will it take you to avoid an answer? rug Apr 2012 #95
And what did it get him? Nothing. darkstar3 Apr 2012 #97
There's another.. rug Apr 2012 #98
Yes, but not in the way you "believe". ;) darkstar3 Apr 2012 #99
I'll answer you too, so there's one less thing you can hide behind. trotsky Apr 2012 #93
And lets be honest, anything atheists do that might actually... eqfan592 Apr 2012 #96
Precisely. trotsky Apr 2012 #105
Not true at all. There was significant support for the reason rally cbayer Apr 2012 #108
rug, on this very forum, attempted to paint the Reason Rally in a bad light... eqfan592 Apr 2012 #113
There is criticism in this group about actions of both atheists and theists. cbayer Apr 2012 #114
I've got a bible or two laying hete somewhere... nt rrneck Apr 2012 #101
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Texas atheist students sw...»Reply #54