Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,708 posts)
18. glorified 22?
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 07:07 PM
Jan 2013

sarisataka: At the risk of being offensive, this is ridiculous. Guns are lethal weapons, they will only make you dead once. Until a more reliable less-lethal weapon system is designed, guns are what we have.

Agree, what you wrote is ridiculous (to what you replied to). Tell you what, I challenge you to a duel. You can use a 22 caliber handgun using 22 shorts, & I'll use an M16, from 150 yards. You can even shoot first (head helmets & heart plate required).
In wwII american gis complained about the m1 carbine, that it sometimes took 3 body hits to bring down a japanese enemy. (the garand m1 was better of course). Semantic games need not apply when speaking of lethality.

Va mtnman: The AR15 is just a little more than a glorified .22 in power, and it is not lethal unless you hit an organ, or a main artery.
I know this because, I was raised a hunter, and understand "what gun, would be used for what purpose" actually Guns, like the AR15 in its standard caliber of 5.56 or .223, are BANNED in many states for hunting, not due to magazine capacity, but because they are too weak to reliably make a clean, merciful kill. Guns of that type tend to wound, not kill.


pffft; not that you're wrong on all, but calling it a glorified 22 is like calling a harley davidson 1100 a glorified moped.
.. bullet energy is determined by kinetic energy, and the formula is thus:
Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x mass x velocity squared
A 22 short might have a muzzle velocity of 1100 fps, & the .223 from the AR15 a muzzle vel of 3,000 fps.

KE 22 short = 1/2 x ~40 grains x 1100 x 1100 = 24 million
KE .223 fmj = 1/2 x ~60 grains x 3,000 x 3,000 = 270 million

so the AR15 .223 fmj delivers 11 times more kinetic energy to the target, than the 22 short.
.. the .223 can cavitate inside the body, creating a kind of shock wave around the bullet path, 1 to 2 inches in diameter, disrupting tissue & organs etc. A 22 will generally just create a wound similar to being stabbed with a long dagger thrust.
.. the .223 tends to fragment into 2 parts which create two bullet paths thru the body, one or both cavitating.

You are correct it, the m16 = AR15 more or less, was designed as much to wound terribly rather than kill, as well as being much lighter to carry about with the .223s bandolier. Actually a better way to put it is that it was designed to kill but if it didn't, it would leave a terrible ghastly wound which would divert troops to tend to the victim.
But the m16 is far more lethal than most rifles, in spite of this. It can take an arm off at the shoulder (see kinetic energy above), which does'nt kill immediately but 2 minutes should do it. The body holes are such that they can't be survived much.

.. what part of sheanadoah you in, vmm? lynchbg?




I think one will need a combination of all three. Kaleva Jul 2012 #1
Education and proper enforcement of current laws. do away with the war on drugs. Enact a National Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #2
Put the arts music and phys ed back in the schools rrneck Jul 2012 #4
What sort of phys ed do you have in mind? radicalliberal Jan 2013 #9
I love the way you ask a question. rrneck Jan 2013 #12
Branching guns into the gun forum are we? sarisataka Jul 2012 #3
Gun manufactures who make semi-automatics produce a defective product. They should be sued. ehrenfeucht games Jan 2013 #15
If they make a defective product sarisataka Jan 2013 #20
So, if a car's engine had the power to go 400mph, with a leadfoot on the gas pedal, ... ehrenfeucht games Jan 2013 #31
As long as it is consistent sarisataka Jan 2013 #32
I own a Honda superbike that will do 180mph+ without breaking a sweat. Ashgrey77 Jan 2013 #33
Hence the word 'donorcycle'.... friendly_iconoclast Jan 2013 #37
Absolutely Abq_Sarah Jan 2013 #38
My thoughts virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #5
Can you share a link to the police dogs vs babies? Thanks. n/t TPaine7 Jul 2012 #6
It is unreal... virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #7
That's really scary looking - seems like the dog escaped and went a bit nuts petronius Jul 2012 #8
glorified 22? jimmy the one Jan 2013 #18
At least part of what you say has a scientific basis. What is your source for saying that AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #26
Would you by chance have a cite for... Marengo Jan 2013 #36
1)Tax break/refund for gun safes 2)Free Body Armor for everyone 3)teach guns in schools OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #10
So everybody is supposed to subsidize your hobby? I'd like a taxbreak/refund for new sails flamin lib Jan 2013 #16
Clearly you're not intersted in helping to keep guns more secure and people safer. OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #19
I thought you were kidding in post #10. Really, I did. flamin lib Jan 2013 #21
Hey, I'm just following suit... OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #22
Whew! My confidence in rationality is somewhat renewed. I did get a laugh tho . . .nt flamin lib Jan 2013 #23
All three. ehrenfeucht games Jan 2013 #11
Have you started doing that yet? oneshooter Jan 2013 #13
nice post, Lee Mercer, Jr Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2013 #14
And prove Wayne LaPierre right by seeking to do so Pullo Jan 2013 #17
You're right. Wayne LaPierre, before the AWB, was a low-level functionary in the Democratic Party. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #27
It's a-comin.' See my post below. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #35
My response iiibbb Jan 2013 #24
Graduated Licensees One_Life_To_Give Jan 2013 #25
"the education route has the least risk of controversy"? Just wait until someone points out that AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #28
m1 carbine jimmy the one Jan 2013 #29
Thanks. The Wiki links certainly seem to confirm that certain WW II stories (but not Korean War or AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #30
There is a problem with the education approach... Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Broad approaches to gun c...»Reply #18