Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: When the price of individualism is just too high [View all]Thats my opinion
(2,001 posts)68. Maybe the sale just has gone through nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
220 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
On you #1 (The reinstitution of the prohibition on the ownership of assault weapons) the AWB
kelly1mm
Dec 2012
#2
So that law needs to be clarified. Threwill be a bill before trhenext Congress to do just that. nt
Thats my opinion
Dec 2012
#16
Relying on me to call the ATF is proof that it is not "strictly regulated." nt.
OrwellwasRight
Dec 2012
#47
Does the Amendment grant the Congress regulatory power over internal policing?
Glaug-Eldare
Dec 2012
#77
Yes, because the federal government has not chosen to go farther, which is exactly the point
OrwellwasRight
Dec 2012
#83
No, I claim to know about a friend who said he bought a gun with no background check or registration
OrwellwasRight
Feb 2013
#106
No, the problem is people can buy gins in bedrooms, on the internet, at gun shows, and from the
OrwellwasRight
Feb 2013
#138
His last post was JAN 21. You posted TODAY, FEB 9. Thats nearly 3 WEEKS later!
cleanhippie
Feb 2013
#126
So why the need to try and call him out for "having to have the last word"?
cleanhippie
Feb 2013
#129
If you found insult in my posts, you need to reevaluate your sensitivty level.
cleanhippie
Feb 2013
#134
oh right, that's why the veiled reference about the ATF stopping international intrigue?
OrwellwasRight
Feb 2013
#215
I use my defense weapon when someone is using their assault weapon. Looks like this
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2012
#13
Thanks for the clarification. I am trying to find my way around this issue. nt
Thats my opinion
Dec 2012
#18
a person with a gun in his hand who shoots and kills someone has disolved the space
Thats my opinion
Dec 2012
#31
Baloney. You're just as much in favor of individualization as the next guy.
slackmaster
Dec 2012
#14
Are you saying thqt ll laws whbich inhibit my action are collectivisic.
Thats my opinion
Dec 2012
#28
No, he is not seeking a solution in faith, he is placing blame on those without it.
cleanhippie
Dec 2012
#57
Wait, I thought you said it was "human unfaithfulness" that caused this shooting.
cleanhippie
Dec 2012
#55
"We don’t allow civilians to purchase or own machine guns" - actually 'we' do...
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#101
to be an individual is be the subset of a set. without the individual there is no set. how the
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2013
#123
Personally, I do not think that anything you propose will curtail gun violence.
geckosfeet
Feb 2013
#127