Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
2. Somebody will probably show up to defend this invasion of privacy, after all it's guns!
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:01 PM
Jan 2012

Probably some of the same people that support banning firearm sales to people on the Bush/Cheney "Terrah" watch list. Or maybe the ones that think Scott Walker is right to ban guns from some state buildings or the inevitable Bloomie 1%er supporters.

It always amazes me how some supposed progressives are ready to accept pretty much any potential infringement on civil liberties ... as long as it has to do with taking guns from people.

I would say that it's warrantless search. OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2012 #1
Somebody will probably show up to defend this invasion of privacy, after all it's guns! DonP Jan 2012 #2
18 minutes. Glassunion Jan 2012 #5
If the cops need a warrant for using IR cameras on your house, ManiacJoe Jan 2012 #7
Sounds like a cool gadget for catching the "bad guys". Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #3
Combine it with facial recognition that checks permits and you've got the perfect bad guy catcher. ileus Jan 2012 #6
Facial recognition is beyond intrusive. It is ultra Orwellian. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #8
Let me get this straight.. pipoman Jan 2012 #21
Bullshit. krispos42 Jan 2012 #11
Oh joy Glassunion Jan 2012 #4
Yeah, like I'd trust NYPD with civil liberties.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #9
Violation of the Fourth Amendment in their pursuit of violating the Second Amendment. Fuck 'em. PavePusher Jan 2012 #10
Don't forget the Fifth Amendment, it has the half-life of a mayfly. nt SteveW Jan 2012 #33
That little guy? I wouldn't worry about that little guy. n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #37
Unless something has come later, it would seem that the USSC decision in Kyllo, petronius Jan 2012 #12
I don't really see a problem here. Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #13
How do you feel about randomly being asked to empty your pockets? X_Digger Jan 2012 #14
I am against that. Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #23
The police don't have the right to search you without warrant X_Digger Jan 2012 #29
I did not know about the FLIR ruling Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #31
It won't fly. Glassunion Jan 2012 #35
Secure in your person means secure. X_Digger Jan 2012 #36
What is this "permit" you speak of, Kemo Sabe? n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #15
In NYC, it's a piece of paper JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2012 #22
Concealed carry permit. n/t Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #24
Sorry, I should have put the sarcasm smiley on my post.... PavePusher Jan 2012 #26
So that makes it O.K. to violate the Fourth? PavePusher Jan 2012 #16
I believe it has already been settled... Atypical Liberal Jan 2012 #25
Observe, in the common sense, means exterior visiblity. PavePusher Jan 2012 #27
If the implement it I plan on carrying a fake gun in my pocked. Made of wood. Logical Jan 2012 #17
.. coated in aluminum foil. :) n/t X_Digger Jan 2012 #18
Good point. But hell, in NYC that night be a felony! Logical Jan 2012 #19
IIRC a shop owner was just slapped with a $30,000 fine for Glassunion Jan 2012 #20
Good idea. Remmah2 Jan 2012 #28
In NYC? Ri-i-i-i-ght.... Pull the other one, it's got bells on. n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #32
I doubt if this technology will be used in the upper class areas of NYC... spin Jan 2012 #30
The Mayors Against Illegal Guns will become the Mayors' Guns. nt SteveW Jan 2012 #34
Most folks that carry guns will oppose this -- more indication they ain't really "responsible" Hoyt Jan 2012 #38
Feel free to explain your "logic". ManiacJoe Jan 2012 #39
That is more of his returning to his police state roots. oneshooter Jan 2012 #40
Police state? Naw. Just don't support cowboy state, Oneshooter. Hoyt Jan 2012 #41
you live in Georgia, I'm in Texas oneshooter Jan 2012 #48
How about you Hoyt, do oppose or support this? N/T Marengo Jan 2012 #42
I think if members of "gun culture" really want to reduce crime, we should all support this. Hoyt Jan 2012 #44
Let me guess? "If you have nothing to hide ..."? DonP Jan 2012 #45
Bet my rear, that same spiel is on the "Free Republic" multiple times. Hoyt Jan 2012 #46
You may be right. You seem to spend more time there than all of uis combined. DonP Jan 2012 #47
It's a waste of time answering questions posed to rationalize attraction to guns. Hoyt Jan 2012 #49
Yeah, sure ... except the question had nothing to do with guns DonP Jan 2012 #50
... it can detect anything blocking it, like a gun. JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2012 #43
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»NYPD, Feds Testing Gun-Sc...»Reply #2