Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spin

(17,493 posts)
64. It is somewhat difficult to have a "productive discussion" on the subject of DGUs ...
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 09:57 PM
Dec 2012

as there is little statistical data for reference.

I live in Florida where gun ownership is common and I know of several incidents where a friend or co-worker described using a firearm for self defense. Admittedly such stories are merely anecdotal.

In most of the cases I have heard of the incident would qualify under your standards for a DGU.


...A defensive gun use means that someone uses a gun to prevent a crime – or, okay, an animal attack. It does not mean a pissing contest that one person settles with a firearm. If a guy breaks into your house and you greet him with a shotgun, that definitely qualifies as a DGU. If you get into an altercation with a guy over a parking space and he becomes disproportionately aggressive to the point of threatening violence and you pull out a gun, chances are that qualifies as well. If you’re arguing with a guy, or even having a fistfight, with more or less equal ferocity and you whip out your Luger just to get the upper hand, that probably does not qualify.


Two of the incidents that I have heard of would not fit your definition. One involved a peeping Tom and the other a prowler. Another involved a police officer who shot an attacking dog and I don't believe you are counting actions by the police.

Two incidents involved members of my family but one occurred in the 1920s and the other in the 90s.

Two involved a mugging by an individual armed with a knife and one with a road raged person with a tire iron. All of these ended when the attacker realized his victim was armed with a handgun. No shots were fired.

Considering that I know a lot of people who own firearms and many who legally carry, these anecdotal tales do not prove that firearms are used frequently for self defense especially when you consider the time frame in which they occurred.

However we both admit that legitimate DGUs do occur. I feel that the figure of 2.5 million times a year is exaggerated but your estimate of 1000 is far too low. Since we are playing a guessing game I estimate the number in the range of 30 to 65 thousand times a year. Most probably involve the use of a firearm for hone defense against a criminal foolish enough to enter an occupied home.

I feel it would be extremely difficult to obtain accurate statistics on DGUs. Any survey would probably be biased by the viewpoint of those who conducted it. Of course the results would be questioned by the other side of the debate and be ignored or discredited. Little would be accomplished.

It might be more valuable to conduct a survey to determine if civilian firearm ownership deters crime. This would involve interviews with individuals with a criminal record. I believe that a few such surveys have been made have shown some deterrent effect. For example a criminal may be less likely to enter an occupied home in Florida than he would in a city such as Chicago where firearm ownership is tightly regulated.










Estimating the Number of DGUs [View all] mikeb302000 Nov 2012 OP
And yet you can't provide any proof glacierbay Nov 2012 #1
For you they're all good ones, right? mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #28
And *I'll* bet you can't produce even one link showing that he believes what you claim... friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #40
Yeah, thought so. All sizzle and no steak, as usual... friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #46
Gun nut trick number 23 mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #49
Proof is posted. Clames Nov 2012 #53
That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed likewise. friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #56
at least provide some evidence gejohnston Nov 2012 #57
"This is not a scientific study..." Atypical Liberal Nov 2012 #2
yep, that is where I stopped reading. Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #13
The actual number can't be known gejohnston Nov 2012 #3
I suppose in your mind that these aren't DGU's glacierbay Nov 2012 #4
Those don't count... ileus Nov 2012 #12
They might be. There are about 500 good ones a year. nt mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #29
And we are to accept without question your diktat about the number of DGUs? friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #41
A guy with a blog quotes a guy with a blog. Stop the presses. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #5
Blogs citing only blogs often escalate into huge non-stories slackmaster Nov 2012 #17
Actually, mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #30
We dont have to with you. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #36
propaganda professor.....LOL ileus Nov 2012 #6
I think it is funny that you have to cite an old blog to flog your own blog. ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #7
What do I think? Straw Man Nov 2012 #8
I'm not saying they're DGUs ... but ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #9
"This is not a scientific study..." Gosh, Mike, you really don't care at all... Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #10
My opinion is that it's a frivolous, low-value speculative brain fart that contributes nothing... slackmaster Nov 2012 #11
Thanks PropagandaProfessor Nov 2012 #14
You stated yourself that your methodology was not scientific slackmaster Nov 2012 #16
for example? gejohnston Nov 2012 #20
Welcome to DU! hrmjustin Nov 2012 #21
You would lose the Ponderosa. GreenStormCloud Nov 2012 #23
What you're leaving out of your calculations is the number of false DGUs. mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #32
No, I easily showed over 1,000 DGU shootings. GreenStormCloud Nov 2012 #43
Your numbers are horrendously off. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #24
"that actually produce a fatality" I didn't see that qualifier. nt mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #33
Read it again. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #37
Knee-jerk reactions. Straw Man Nov 2012 #27
Thanks to you Propaganda Professor mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #31
What truth? Clames Nov 2012 #44
The truth? Straw Man Nov 2012 #45
I'm afraid any list of so-called DGUs is chock full of criminal acts jckelly Nov 2012 #15
As opposed to the popular adage mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #50
I have four words for that gejohnston Nov 2012 #58
I think you gun restrictionist agenda is a complete failure. aikoaiko Nov 2012 #18
Failure? Really? mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #34
McDonald also lost at the circuit level- at first, then was upheld at the USSC. friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #39
Federal appeals court strikes down concealed carry ban [Illinois] hack89 Dec 2012 #63
Big news. Peoria will be really safe now. nt mikeb302000 Dec 2012 #65
I think that the reason that the gun-restrictionist crowd goes after DGU with such Simo 1939_1940 Nov 2012 #19
The United States Department of Justice pins the number at 60k-100k per year depending on year. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #22
Too True jckelly Nov 2012 #25
Your 98% positivity is tainted by paranoia. nt mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #35
How would you know? I rather doubt you were there at the time. friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #38
maybe your right jckelly Nov 2012 #42
And your 500 DGU figure is pulled out of your taint. n/t Common Sense Party Nov 2012 #48
Wait... What!? Glassunion Nov 2012 #26
Mike is an expert only in accomplishing own-goals. PavePusher Dec 2012 #60
Well, not really. mikeb302000 Dec 2012 #66
You are not helping your point. Glassunion Dec 2012 #68
Is that "upwards of" 500? Common Sense Party Nov 2012 #47
Yeah, upwards of 500. nt mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #51
Which means LESS THAN 500 in your lexicon? Common Sense Party Nov 2012 #52
Not the first time mikey had been caught incorrectly using that phrase. Clames Nov 2012 #54
I remember it well. Common Sense Party Nov 2012 #55
Checking in again PropagandaProfessor Dec 2012 #59
When you ignore entire types of DGU hack89 Dec 2012 #61
Why don't you tell us how to verify the 4th category. nt mikeb302000 Dec 2012 #67
You tell us first how you can completely ignore it hack89 Dec 2012 #69
It is somewhat difficult to have a "productive discussion" on the subject of DGUs ... spin Dec 2012 #64
FWIW, I did a quick google after your earlier thread, and petronius Dec 2012 #62
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Estimating the Number of ...»Reply #64