Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I'm not going to subscribe to WSJ to read the whole article gejohnston Dec 2012 #1
Strange, I read the article without a subscription when I posted the link SecularMotion Dec 2012 #2
I couldn't read it either, but on the front page it's now labelled as "subscriber content" petronius Dec 2012 #4
It's probably a paywall that goes up after you read a few articles. : ( nt rDigital Dec 2012 #11
That's the part I've always wondered about - these attempted murders should be showing petronius Dec 2012 #3
Are they discussing per capita rates, or merely the total number? n/t PavePusher Dec 2012 #5
O.K., no subscription wall for me, so here's a few points from the article: PavePusher Dec 2012 #6
So all of the shootings wendylaroux Dec 2012 #7
Misleading title for OP. Clames Dec 2012 #8
Right! And the earth is flat too! Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #9
You believing that fits in perfectly with your other arguments. Clames Dec 2012 #13
Riddle me this then hack89 Dec 2012 #10
Good point. (n/t) spin Dec 2012 #12
This is because not all aggravated assaults involve guns. DanTex Dec 2012 #17
This entire situation is as clear as mud hack89 Dec 2012 #19
The one thing that is crystal clear is that the NRA bots will believe anything... DanTex Dec 2012 #23
They use a data set that perfectly staddles a historic high in gun violence hack89 Dec 2012 #25
LOL. I love it when scientifically ignorant pro-gunners take on the peer reviewed research. DanTex Dec 2012 #26
96% percent of the counties were populous urban counties. hack89 Dec 2012 #27
Not sure where you got that number. DanTex Dec 2012 #28
Sorry -it was 92.6 %. hack89 Dec 2012 #29
You really have no clue what is going on in that study. DanTex Dec 2012 #31
Appears I know more about it than you do hack89 Dec 2012 #32
Do you understand the results are based on county-by-county analysis and not national trends? DanTex Dec 2012 #33
Yes hack89 Dec 2012 #34
Umm, actually no you don't. DanTex Dec 2012 #35
But in aggregate those counties experienced a significant decrease in homicides. hack89 Dec 2012 #36
Again, you can't replicate county-by-county analysis based on aggregate data. DanTex Dec 2012 #37
You have lost track of the big picture hack89 Dec 2012 #38
Umm, once again, you can't replicate a county-by-county study based on the "big picture". DanTex Dec 2012 #39
Considering it was funded by a grant from the Joyce Foundation hack89 Dec 2012 #40
LOL. And there it is! DanTex Dec 2012 #41
I am willing to accept that it is a good study hack89 Dec 2012 #42
But you obviously missed the point of it completely. DanTex Dec 2012 #44
Yes - gun violence by criminals hack89 Dec 2012 #45
Does this mean Ludwig was right about emergency medicine? nt hack89 Dec 2012 #43
Where is the money? RamRoddoc Dec 2012 #14
Stab wounds are climbing faster... Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #15
Except gun violence is not "soaring". Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #16
Not all violent crimes are gun crimes. DanTex Dec 2012 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Glassunion Dec 2012 #21
You may be right. Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #22
Comment about those charts. DanTex Dec 2012 #24
I just let Calc do it automatically. Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #30
According to the CDC, the story checks out. DanTex Dec 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»In Medical Triumph, Homic...»Reply #7