Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
1. Everyone should be armed all the time.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 08:47 AM
Dec 2012

Unarmed people encourage this sort of lawless behavior and senseless tragedy. If we required everyone to be armed all the time, the murder rate would quickly drop to zero. Obviously three months is too young, but surely by first grade, in addition to learning to read, our children should be learning to shoot, and along with their backpacks filled with books they should be carrying a gun for protection. Another word for unarmed people is "targets". Don't be a target. Don't let your loved ones be targets. Arm your toddler today.

Everyone should be armed all the time. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #1
Interesting. I understand your sarcasm, but it was not that long ago when colonial governments geckosfeet Dec 2012 #2
This is not the 18th century. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #3
"Tsunami of gun violence?" The data shows falling crime rates... Eleanors38 Dec 2012 #6
Dang - I always forget to switch my calendars. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #22
"a centuries long invasion/migration and genocide".... PavePusher Dec 2012 #24
Great post. Hope you made it to work on time. (n/t) spin Dec 2012 #9
Yep. Thanks. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #23
The astute observer will note that nobody on this forum has ever made such a suggestion seriously slackmaster Dec 2012 #5
So do you think carrying a gun makes you safer? Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #16
I don't carry one. I know a few people who do, and they all have good reasons. slackmaster Dec 2012 #17
It gives me the ability to resist an attacker. GreenStormCloud Dec 2012 #19
Seems like a simple question. Nobody cares to volunteer a simple answer. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #20
We give clear, concise answers all the time. PavePusher Dec 2012 #25
Ad from the past AlexSatan Dec 2012 #8
Your screen name says it all rl6214 Dec 2012 #14
If she could prove it was self-defense then she would likely be supported. GreenStormCloud Dec 2012 #4
I would. Had she been able to defend herself - or better yet, escape - it would petronius Dec 2012 #7
I guess the right was so offended at costas because his comments reveal prejudices. alp227 Dec 2012 #12
I haven't really seen Perkins blamed in any way - and a truly despicable sentiment that petronius Dec 2012 #15
unforntunatly, I think you are right for the most part gejohnston Dec 2012 #10
If Kasandra Perkins had a firearm and the skill to use it she might be alive today. ... spin Dec 2012 #11
...albeit with tarnished reputation. alp227 Dec 2012 #13
True. However it's better to be alive with a damaged reputation than dead. (n/t) spin Dec 2012 #18
Actually, the NRA would love her is she had used a gun to defend herself. GreenStormCloud Dec 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»If Jovan Belcher's girlfr...»Reply #1