Gun Control & RKBA

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)

13. yep, that is where I stopped reading.

Reply to Atypical Liberal (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 26, 2012, 07:31 PM

Nov 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Estimating the Number of DGUs [View all] mikeb302000 Nov 2012 OP

And yet you can't provide any proof glacierbay Nov 2012 #1

For you they're all good ones, right? mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #28

And *I'll* bet you can't produce even one link showing that he believes what you claim... friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #40

Yeah, thought so. All sizzle and no steak, as usual... friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #46

Gun nut trick number 23 mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #49

Proof is posted. Clames Nov 2012 #53

That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed likewise. friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #56

at least provide some evidence gejohnston Nov 2012 #57

"This is not a scientific study..." Atypical Liberal Nov 2012 #2

yep, that is where I stopped reading. Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #13

The actual number can't be known gejohnston Nov 2012 #3

I suppose in your mind that these aren't DGU's glacierbay Nov 2012 #4

Those don't count... ileus Nov 2012 #12

They might be. There are about 500 good ones a year. nt mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #29

And we are to accept without question your diktat about the number of DGUs? friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #41

A guy with a blog quotes a guy with a blog. Stop the presses. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #5

Blogs citing only blogs often escalate into huge non-stories slackmaster Nov 2012 #17

Actually, mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #30

We dont have to with you. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #36

propaganda professor.....LOL ileus Nov 2012 #6

I think it is funny that you have to cite an old blog to flog your own blog. ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #7

What do I think? Straw Man Nov 2012 #8

I'm not saying they're DGUs ... but ... holdencaufield Nov 2012 #9

"This is not a scientific study..." Gosh, Mike, you really don't care at all... Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #10

My opinion is that it's a frivolous, low-value speculative brain fart that contributes nothing... slackmaster Nov 2012 #11

Thanks PropagandaProfessor Nov 2012 #14

You stated yourself that your methodology was not scientific slackmaster Nov 2012 #16

for example? gejohnston Nov 2012 #20

Welcome to DU! hrmjustin Nov 2012 #21

You would lose the Ponderosa. GreenStormCloud Nov 2012 #23

What you're leaving out of your calculations is the number of false DGUs. mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #32

No, I easily showed over 1,000 DGU shootings. GreenStormCloud Nov 2012 #43

Your numbers are horrendously off. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #24

"that actually produce a fatality" I didn't see that qualifier. nt mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #33

Read it again. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #37

Knee-jerk reactions. Straw Man Nov 2012 #27

Thanks to you Propaganda Professor mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #31

What truth? Clames Nov 2012 #44

The truth? Straw Man Nov 2012 #45

I'm afraid any list of so-called DGUs is chock full of criminal acts jckelly Nov 2012 #15

As opposed to the popular adage mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #50

I have four words for that gejohnston Nov 2012 #58

I think you gun restrictionist agenda is a complete failure. aikoaiko Nov 2012 #18

Failure? Really? mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #34

McDonald also lost at the circuit level- at first, then was upheld at the USSC. friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #39

Federal appeals court strikes down concealed carry ban [Illinois] hack89 Dec 2012 #63

Big news. Peoria will be really safe now. nt mikeb302000 Dec 2012 #65

I think that the reason that the gun-restrictionist crowd goes after DGU with such Simo 1939_1940 Nov 2012 #19

The United States Department of Justice pins the number at 60k-100k per year depending on year. AtheistCrusader Nov 2012 #22

Too True jckelly Nov 2012 #25

Your 98% positivity is tainted by paranoia. nt mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #35

How would you know? I rather doubt you were there at the time. friendly_iconoclast Nov 2012 #38

maybe your right jckelly Nov 2012 #42

And your 500 DGU figure is pulled out of your taint. n/t Common Sense Party Nov 2012 #48

Wait... What!? Glassunion Nov 2012 #26

Mike is an expert only in accomplishing own-goals. PavePusher Dec 2012 #60

Well, not really. mikeb302000 Dec 2012 #66

You are not helping your point. Glassunion Dec 2012 #68

Is that "upwards of" 500? Common Sense Party Nov 2012 #47

Yeah, upwards of 500. nt mikeb302000 Nov 2012 #51

Which means LESS THAN 500 in your lexicon? Common Sense Party Nov 2012 #52

Not the first time mikey had been caught incorrectly using that phrase. Clames Nov 2012 #54

I remember it well. Common Sense Party Nov 2012 #55

Checking in again PropagandaProfessor Dec 2012 #59

When you ignore entire types of DGU hack89 Dec 2012 #61

Why don't you tell us how to verify the 4th category. nt mikeb302000 Dec 2012 #67

You tell us first how you can completely ignore it hack89 Dec 2012 #69

It is somewhat difficult to have a "productive discussion" on the subject of DGUs ... spin Dec 2012 #64

FWIW, I did a quick google after your earlier thread, and petronius Dec 2012 #62