Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Questions for those who support banning firearms. [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)10. The problem with that idea is obvious ...
If you have any knowledge of firearms you would realize that it is far harder to shoot one accurately than is portrayed in the movies or on TV. Practice is necessary and that requires bullets.
You might argue that if ammo was that expensive that criminals would be unable to obtain it. We have had a war on drugs for decades and yet I can walk two blocks from where I live and buy any drug that I want. I also have the equipment and the experience to make my own ammo. I reloaded ammunition for many years although I haven't recently.
I find Chris Rock's comment humorous but I realize that he is a comedian.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have seen that before, and I think it was funny, however, I know a guy who makes his own bullets,
ZombieHorde
Sep 2012
#2
The NRA is the most moderate of any of the major gun-rights organizations.
GreenStormCloud
Sep 2012
#82
When I said I knew someone who makes his bullets, I think I should have said
ZombieHorde
Sep 2012
#5
Ammunition is included in arms - banning bullets, either directly or via a prohibitive
petronius
Sep 2012
#49
WOW!!! At $5,000 per round I would have 150 million dollars sitting in my closet!
kelly1mm
Sep 2012
#78
At that point, I don't think the percentage would be "small" any longer. n/t
PavePusher
Sep 2012
#17
I doubt that guns will stop such an event as blood in the streets style civil war.
FarPoint
Sep 2012
#37
And thus create the tyranny the Second Amendment was intended to give us a fighting chance against.
PavePusher
Sep 2012
#16
I'm just pointing out the futility of any type of ban on things that people want. Like Drugs, but
rDigital
Sep 2012
#56
I don't think that would be possible. There is no will to take that kind of action in the US.
rDigital
Sep 2012
#58
To be fair, mike_c does support other personal defense weapons, such as pepper spray.
ZombieHorde
Sep 2012
#22
YOU said that the Constitution shouldn't cover future technological advancements.
MercutioATC
Sep 2012
#66
Therefore, we're going to eliminate 1st Amendment rights for radio, TV and the internet.
MercutioATC
Sep 2012
#54
Do you think the non-existence of violent crime in your town has something to do with
rDigital
Sep 2012
#59
You don't have the right to live in a government gun restricted environment.
GreenStormCloud
Sep 2012
#86