Gun Control & RKBA

TruthAnalyzed

(83 posts)

11. Do you really want some serious discussion?

Tue Aug 21, 2012, 07:29 PM

Aug 2012

Let's discuss. I'll make a thread. We can each post studies and stories, along with our commentary, and try to deduce strong arguments for and against both good and bad gun policy.

No ad hominem allowed.

Sound like a plan?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Google Dumps Policy Proposal for the Gun Control & RKBA Group [View all] TPaine7 Aug 2012 OP

If a googler dumps something interesting we can discuss it with or without the OP's petronius Aug 2012 #1

I get your point, but I think allowing google dumps by folks who then run for the hills makes it TPaine7 Aug 2012 #2

If the OP does not find the article interesting enough to comment on it, ManiacJoe Aug 2012 #3

Well stated. n/t DWC Aug 2012 #39

RTFMS SecularMotion Aug 2012 #4

Yeah....you should read it. Clames Aug 2012 #5

It comes out from its cover... holdencaufield Aug 2012 #6

I've yet to find any thought-provoking discussions in the gungeon. SecularMotion Aug 2012 #9

Do you really want some serious discussion? TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #11

No Thanks SecularMotion Aug 2012 #14

You're not interested in discussion? TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #15

Your views are far to the right of myself and most of DU SecularMotion Aug 2012 #19

My 'Views'? TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #20

Would a study by the Department of Justice TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #21

Pardon me for interjecting... discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2012 #44

Your attitudes are the reason we coined the word "Proglodyte." Callisto32 Aug 2012 #37

BTW, I said no ad hominem... TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #16

"I'm not interested in reading any of your opinions." holdencaufield Aug 2012 #18

If you're not interested in discussion... Lizzie Poppet Aug 2012 #27

"I'm not interested in reading any of your opinions." Simo 1939_1940 Aug 2012 #31

What would be a "thought-provoking discussion{}" in your book? TPaine7 Aug 2012 #17

And what do you contribute... Clames Aug 2012 #24

"Thought-provoking discussions"?? MicaelS Aug 2012 #35

Exactly. DanTex Aug 2012 #36

So quoting bloggers is ok, as long as they oppose gun rights?! Why am I not surprised? n/t TPaine7 Aug 2012 #40

If you've "yet to find any thought-provoking discussions in the gungeon" Jenoch Aug 2012 #38

It seems clear to me that a person who doesn't want to engage in discussion TPaine7 Aug 2012 #41

"...who typically posts the opinions of others and leaves is intentionally disrupting..." Jenoch Aug 2012 #43

Here is a "Thought Provoking" discussion for you. DWC Aug 2012 #42

If it helps you to think that I, or anyone else here, is afraid of news TPaine7 Aug 2012 #13

I post legislative news regularly. GreenStormCloud Aug 2012 #29

Oops, I think you accidentally replied to a thread! nt Union Scribe Aug 2012 #34

Sounds like a call for censorship to me. Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #7

Go to GD and post your undying love for romney and see how that goes. 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #10

I support censorship, in principle and in practice, as do you TPaine7 Aug 2012 #12

Lack of original content on your Google dumps... Clames Aug 2012 #25

I don't have a problem with posting some article you found 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #8

I just don't care much either way. The anti-gun obsessed do this for awhile and then slink away. aikoaiko Aug 2012 #22

Google dumps without explanation rDigital Aug 2012 #23

You should replace "an agenda" with "a position" petronius Aug 2012 #28

I think we can all agree this thread needs more cowbell : ). nt rDigital Aug 2012 #30

+1 TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #32

I typically don't comment Reasonable_Argument Aug 2012 #26

Meh... Glassunion Aug 2012 #33