Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Police: Body found at US park is that of gunman [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)67. I'm missing the relevant issue?
We don't know how he got his guns. He had a restraining order, which may have made him ineligible for firearms.
Until we know how he got them, kinda pointless to speculate, isn't it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i am just so sad by this story. i know that i am suppose to be angry at this man.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#1
for fuck sake, lol..... it is a gun issue wish was not how i addressed the post
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#4
MSM called him a "survivalist" rathern than face up to how he became a murderer...
SteveW
Jan 2012
#78
yes. and again... because in my book, i almost feel it rude not to reply to a person.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#86
respectfully, i disagree. lol, i do mean respectfully. poster #3 GUESSED and MADE UP (as you are)
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#96
You'll see guys like him in any gun store in this country. And you guys want him to carry in public.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#27
And who are "you guys"? Got a link to a thread where someone said that?
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#30
*I* certainly wouldn't have wanted him to carry, as he was obviously deranged.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#44
That would be prior restraint, and it's something generally frowned upon.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#77
Ah, but since it's now a protected right, a higher standard prevails
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#88
And sometimes, the precautions simply don't work. See one Michael Atherton, for example:
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#94
I'd point out that firearms categories are not congruent in our two countries.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#100
I've no inherent objection to mandatory licensing, as it's used here in Massachusetts.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#106
I'm sorry, but including "risk factors" as a criteria is entirely too subjective.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#113
What does this "current events" post have to do with the topics of the Guns discussion group?
slackmaster
Jan 2012
#11
Yes, it *is* telling. It tells me that veterans need better aftercare.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#17
The post would be a much better contribution if it included even a minimal editorial remark in OP
slackmaster
Jan 2012
#49
People with strong views on any subject tend to be the ones most likely to engage in discussions
slackmaster
Jan 2012
#83
In political science, the term for "strong views" is "militancy," like stuffing envelopes. nt
SteveW
Jan 2012
#92
Just wondering why poster wants one of those guns so bad, and why in hell he would post it here.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#31
That's the kind of gunner I know-- talking about guns and crud over victim's grave?
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#41
And they are popular among those who pose in front of mirror before shooting a woman.
Hoyt
Jan 2012
#42
And computers are popular amongst those who trade child pornography, run botnets...
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2012
#45
Should probably replace Bill Wade with someone that has two brain cells to rub together.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2012
#62