Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aikoaiko

(34,162 posts)
50. No worries. Press Sec Jay Carney said no new federal gun laws. Obama is playing the anti-gun freaks
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 11:44 PM
Aug 2012

He was really clever saying that AK47 should be in the hands of soldiers since true AK47 are either in the hands of soldiers or tightly regulated by NFA.

The next day Carney was clearing up any misconceptions about new federal laws.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/white-house-plays-down-prospect-gun-laws-224057070.html


It's Not Just Obama Iggy Jul 2012 #1
and the anti gun Republicans? gejohnston Jul 2012 #4
"Anti Gun" Repuglicans Iggy Jul 2012 #5
You are too young to remember gejohnston Jul 2012 #9
Assumptions..... Iggy Jul 2012 #32
never said it was a top concern gejohnston Jul 2012 #34
I know a few anti-gun republicans. OneTenthofOnePercent Jul 2012 #11
Sounds like a garage sale philosophy. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #38
I have family members (cousins) who are anti-gun Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #18
the whole board of the brady bunch campaign alabama_for_obama Jul 2012 #24
Yeah, grow a spine! NewMoonTherian Jul 2012 #28
"Yeah, they need to listen to OUR pathetic lobbying groups, damnit!" Callisto32 Jul 2012 #31
What additional laws would you suggest? armueller2001 Jul 2012 #17
What responsible new laws would you like to see passed? oneshooter Jul 2012 #22
Little history lesson for you Trunk Monkey Jul 2012 #23
Gore lost the 2000 election because it was stolen. He also lost it because he ran a awful campaign still_one Aug 2012 #52
while I agree with you, gejohnston Aug 2012 #53
If it was today I would agree with the assessment regarding the power of the NRA, but even though still_one Aug 2012 #56
It is not the "NRA the lobby group" gejohnston Aug 2012 #57
Status quo. emilyg Aug 2012 #54
Like what? spin Aug 2012 #61
Trying to ban the most popular firearms in the country Dr_Scholl Jul 2012 #2
You don't want a President Romney? SecularMotion Jul 2012 #3
I'll take your advice under consideration, TPaine7 Jul 2012 #8
this could go very very badly in NOV. littlewolf Jul 2012 #6
Why do the pol's always engage in "assault rifle" doublespeak? OneTenthofOnePercent Jul 2012 #7
they depend too heavily on gejohnston Jul 2012 #10
I support Obama, but I don't think that excuse remotely excuses him. TPaine7 Jul 2012 #13
He stated AK because he's been told attacking the AR ileus Jul 2012 #12
which reminds me gejohnston Jul 2012 #14
Because Shilka-Gunluvr Jul 2012 #16
I don't think he does Shilka-Gunluvr Jul 2012 #15
He knows what he's doing. And he know most folks that hung up on guns aren't going to vote for him. Hoyt Jul 2012 #19
That's a good point. NewMoonTherian Jul 2012 #29
Maybe. I think the 90+% of population that would not think of toting in public have "toes" too. Hoyt Jul 2012 #30
That's cool and all, but what about the entire subset of Americans (22-25%) that own guns? friendly_iconoclast Jul 2012 #35
I think most people with guns aren't as into them as those who tote and have a cache in their house. Hoyt Jul 2012 #37
You are naive beyond belief, sir....... Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #40
Sorry, I think you are wrong. I don't think most people hold guns in such Hoyt Jul 2012 #42
I wouldn't vote for a republican Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #43
Might as well vote for them. Guns just aren't that important to most people. Hoyt Jul 2012 #44
Democrats suffer a compound penalty for their positions on gun restriction. Simo 1939_1940 Aug 2012 #45
Look, someone who is that much into guns ain't likely going to vote for a Democrat. Hoyt Aug 2012 #46
guilt by association? gejohnston Aug 2012 #47
Typical gun owner in my experience. You guys may be different, but that's your typical right winger. Hoyt Aug 2012 #48
you need to get out more gejohnston Aug 2012 #49
No, but per the usual -- you dodge the main point. Simo 1939_1940 Aug 2012 #59
Yesterday I finally mailed back a letter instead of a check in response to a request Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #20
Good on you, Simo. Callisto32 Jul 2012 #33
Thanks, Callisto. I also donated a few hundred to the Democratic Party, and hence Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #39
Funny reaction bongbong Aug 2012 #58
1,000 X? Reaaaaally? Simo 1939_1940 Aug 2012 #60
You'll notice he did not go after "assault rifles". Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #21
Agreed. President Obama is a very smart man, and chose his words deliberately. friendly_iconoclast Jul 2012 #25
FWIW, add me to the list who believe that President Obama is playing with fire. NT Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #41
Chess, not checkers mwrguy Jul 2012 #26
I'm totally against AK-47's in the hands of civilians. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #27
The obvious solution is... LAGC Jul 2012 #36
No worries. Press Sec Jay Carney said no new federal gun laws. Obama is playing the anti-gun freaks aikoaiko Aug 2012 #50
I think any type of making it difficult for law abiding citizensp darkangel218 Aug 2012 #51
It sounds like Jenoch Aug 2012 #55
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»I hope Obama knows what h...»Reply #50