Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: "Because a well-regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state..." [View all]GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)9. Your video lies about the CC-Reciprocity Bill.
It would NOT grant the power to carry regardless of local laws. The carrier will still have to obey local gun laws.
Hartman glosses over Adams qualifier, "...except in cases of individual self-defense...". He reads Adams' statement but then acts like the qualifier isn't there.
It is posts like this that place you firmly in the anti-gun camp, despite your claims.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Because a well-regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state..." [View all]
Adsos Letter
Jul 2012
OP
He lost credibility in the first few seconds when he lied about the CC-Reciprocity bill.
GreenStormCloud
Jul 2012
#24
He lost credibility in the first few seconds when he lied about the CC-Reciprocity bill.
GreenStormCloud
Jul 2012
#27
When you have nothing else, post an irrelevant Nugent clip as if it meant something
DonP
Jul 2012
#35
Thanks. just wondered if anyone had something they felt was especially well-written.
Adsos Letter
Jul 2012
#11