Gun Control & RKBA

bongbong

(5,436 posts)

38. The gun grabbers

Reply to permatex (Reply #18)

Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:30 PM

Jul 2012

Oh my my! The ultra-sensitive but-oh-so TOUGH gun-relgionists are busy having my posts banned.

They're so TOUGH!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

75 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Want to buy a silencer, sawed-off shotgun or explosives? Sheriff will no longer help [View all] Meiko Jul 2012 OP

In the "gunshine" state no less gejohnston Jul 2012 #1

He is fulfilling his responsibility to citizens by not helping gun nuts get more lethal "toys. " Hoyt Jul 2012 #2

They're not toys bongbong Jul 2012 #3

Do you have anything constructive to add permatex Jul 2012 #18

The gun grabbers bongbong Jul 2012 #38

So do you have anything constructive to add permatex Jul 2012 #39

No bongbong Jul 2012 #51

As I've stated before permatex Jul 2012 #52

You said it, not me bongbong Jul 2012 #62

Congrats sarisataka Jul 2012 #60

How does that qualify as his responsibility? NewMoonTherian Jul 2012 #6

How does a silencer Meiko Jul 2012 #17

My god, how irresponsible of the sheriff. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #4

I think the sheriff did it because the French use silencers at their ranges gejohnston Jul 2012 #5

Ah mon dieu! Les francais sont terribles. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #11

Who's flooding the streets with anything? NewMoonTherian Jul 2012 #7

Makes one wonder what they do with them when they take them out of the safe. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #12

been watching too many movies gejohnston Jul 2012 #14

Actually... NewMoonTherian Jul 2012 #30

Your clear insinuation is that people have criminal intent. PavePusher Jul 2012 #54

"flooding the streets" 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #8

Shh! It's more important to kill each other quietly. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #13

I just wish they'd work on accuracy 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #15

More insinuation against non-criminals. PavePusher Jul 2012 #56

Your ignorance and manufactured deflections are quite stunning. PavePusher Jul 2012 #10

So you think sawed-off shotguns are legitimate weapons to own? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #21

why aren't sawed off shotguns legitimate weapons to own? gejohnston Jul 2012 #25

I'm familiar with ways to make a silencer. But that isn't my point. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #32

because gejohnston Jul 2012 #35

Please explain why an 18" barrel on a shotgun should be legal, but not a 17" barrel. PavePusher Jul 2012 #40

P.S. Why should mufflers for firearms not be legal for over-the-counter sale... PavePusher Jul 2012 #41

Assuming one is not a convicted felon or otherwise prohibited by law? S_B_Jackson Jul 2012 #43

Oh my, want some cheese with that? Meiko Jul 2012 #20

I'm not supporting the sheriff. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #23

I don't think Meiko Jul 2012 #31

Correct. A lot of fire power. For what? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #33

people collect stuff gejohnston Jul 2012 #36

I know. It's a strange world. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #67

This message was self-deleted by its author Meiko Jul 2012 #42

These weapons are designed to deliver maximum Meiko Jul 2012 #45

I understand all that. And I'm sure they are fun to shoot. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #68

Mines? Meiko Jul 2012 #69

Double your fun sarisataka Jul 2012 #70

There are probably people who collect finger nail clippings too. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #71

You have a CORVETTE. For what?????????????? Tejas Jul 2012 #46

I don't have a corvette. You couldn't pay me enough to have one. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #74

"I think there is much we need to question about this world we live in. PavePusher Jul 2012 #58

Yeah, I'm not big on the "moral-police" or any kind of police. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #75

This is part of the sheriffs job....he has responsibilities to the citizens ileus Jul 2012 #9

What could possibly be more progressive than buying a silencer and a sawed-off shotgun? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #19

Well, gejohnston Jul 2012 #22

We are not in France or Finland Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #24

The silencer, which should be called a muffler, is beneficial to your hearing when hunting. permatex Jul 2012 #26

Right, I've heard that before about the "muffler", noise suppressor, silencer Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #27

Calling it a silencer is just Hollywood crap permatex Jul 2012 #29

US federal law in addition to the inventor's own patent describes them as "silencers"... OneTenthofOnePercent Jul 2012 #48

I know that permatex Jul 2012 #49

Ear protection doesn't do anything to help reduce the disturbance to people near petronius Jul 2012 #34

what they are designed for gejohnston Jul 2012 #28

Noise pollution, right! Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #53

I don't understand your position on silencers permatex Jul 2012 #55

A few reasons, none of which are illegitimate: OneTenthofOnePercent Jul 2012 #50

Thanks for the explanation. I should probably get back on the boat now. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #57

"...which I don't buy for one minute." PavePusher Jul 2012 #59

They make shot groups more precise... they do not make "aiming" any easier. OneTenthofOnePercent Jul 2012 #65

Oh right. Shot groups. Like group shots, right? Try a tripod. There, fixed it. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #66

Conflation with criminal intent from you.... again? Whodathunkit. PavePusher Jul 2012 #72

No longer an excuse? For what? LOL Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #73

What is not progessive about class III ileus Jul 2012 #37

That whole signature requirement seems obsolete, and should be stricken petronius Jul 2012 #16

I can't wait. Callisto32 Jul 2012 #44

It's none of his business anyway. Tejas Jul 2012 #47

Not that I agree with the Sheriff's decision but.. HALO141 Jul 2012 #61

Agree Full auto = $$$ to feed, but an SBR or muffler ileus Jul 2012 #63

Indeed! HALO141 Jul 2012 #64